Meyrin Geneve, Germany

Low-Energy Ultrasound, Electrical and Magnetic Field Stimulation in Therapy-Resistant Myofascial Pain Syndrome

Contribution Of Cognitivo-Behavorial Therapy In Shoulder Apprehension

Traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder is one of the most frequent lesions of the shoulder, the majority of cases of which occur in adolescents, with a risk of recurrence close to 90% if it occurs before the age of 20 years. It can be treated conservatively or surgically. Stabilizing surgery of the glenohumeral joint offers satisfactory results for people suffering from shoulder instability. Like subjects treated conservatively, patients undergoing stabilizing surgery remain apprehensive after the operation in 2 to 51% of cases. Currently, no rehabilitation program has demonstrated superior effectiveness, during instability treated conservatively or during postoperative rehabilitation. Recent studies have shown that cortical reorganization takes place, especially in areas of fear and anxiety. Faced with the need to develop physiotherapeutic management in post-traumatic unstable shoulder, this study aims to evaluate the contribution of cognitive-behavioral therapy, by including a neuropsychological axis in the rehabilitation of patients. This study is randomized and controlled, multicenter, including 144 patients suffering from apprehension of the shoulder, divided into two treatment groups. Both groups will receive a conventional physiotherapy protocol including individual sessions and home exercises. The physiotherapists in the intervention group will also have received training in the use of techniques from Cognitive-Behavioral Therapies. Data will be collected before the introduction of physiotherapy, after 6, 12, 24 and 52 weeks of treatment. In the event of surgery, the data will also be collected preoperatively. The primary outcome is apprehension measured by the Rowe score. The secondary outcomes are apprehension measured by the apprehension and relocation tests, and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, as well as shoulder function, measured by the Simple Shoulder Test and the Subjective Shoulder Value.

Using a Computer-assisted Prescription to Decrease Inappropriate Use of Plain Abdominal Radiography in Emergency Department

The Medacta International GMK Sphere Cementless Post-Marketing Surveillance Study

Anatomic TSA Vs RTSA for Glenohumeral Arthritis

Total anatomic shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is an effective treatment of severe glenohumeral osteoarthritis, with significant improvement in shoulder pain and function. Concerns about glenoid loosening, associated with difficult revision procedures and disappointing outcomes, have however been raised. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) was designed with a medialized center of rotation to treat cuff tear arthropathy. Favorable early reports led to the expansion of primary indications of RTSA to proximal humeral fractures as well as osteoarthritis with poor glenoid bone stock. Recent reports revealed excellent clinical results of RTSA for primary glenohumeral arthropathy with intact rotator cuff and a low rate of complications. Retrospective studies comparing functional results - of anatomic TSA for treating glenohumeral osteoarthritis with RTSA for rotator cuff arthropathy - found equivalent or greater improvements in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES) at >2-year follow-up. In a study comparing anatomic TSA to RTSA for the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with intact rotator cuffs, Steen et al. reported equivalent functional results at >2-year follow-up. The retrospective matched cohort study could, however, not eliminate biases, such that RTSA patients had higher preoperative glenoid retroversion than anatomic TSA patients. The authors therefore hypothesize that, in patients treated for glenohumeral osteoarthritis without excessive glenoid retroversion, RTSA will render better functional outcomes than anatomic TSA, at 2 postoperative years. Many other studies confirmed in 2019 Steen's hypothesis. Moreover, several studies revealed good long-term survivorship after RTSA. There are no published prospective studies that compared 2-year functional outcomes of RTSA and anatomic TSA for the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with intact rotator cuffs and no excessive glenoid retroversion. The primary goal of our prospective randomized study is to determine whether RTSA have at least as good results as anatomic TSA (non-inferiority), in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis, without rotator cuff tears nor significant glenoid retroversion.The secondary goals are 1) to evaluate whether RTSA eventually grants superior postoperative clinical and radiographic outcomes than anatomic TSA (superiority), 2) to determine whether RTSA is associated with fewer postoperative complications than anatomic TSA.

Patient Retrospective Outcomes (PRO)

This study is a retrospective, multi-center, de-identified patient data review. The study will include multiple independent cohorts to evaluate clinical outcomes in different subgroups.