Gladenbach, Germany

Adjusted High-dose Chemotherapy with Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Vs. Conventional Immunochemotherapy in Elderly PCNSL Patients

Primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the central nervous system (PCNSL) is a rare lymphoma affecting only the central nervous system compartment. PCNSL patients are typically 60 years or older and have poor prognoses. However, there are alternative treatment approaches to consider with the potential to improve medical outcomes for this patient population. The current standard of care in Germany and many international centres for patients 65 and older is treatment with R-MP, comprising rituximab, high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) and procarbazine followed by maintenance therapy with procarbazine. An alternative approach comprised of a shorter induction treatment with rituximab, HD-MTX and cytarabine (MARTA) followed by age-adjusted high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HCT-ASCT) was recently shown to be feasible and effective in elderly PCNSL patients considered eligible for high-dose chemotherapy requiring autologous stem cell transplantation. Nevertheless, data evaluating this short duration treatment approach remains scarce, and randomized trials have not yet been published. The objective of the PRIMA-CNS trial is to demonstrate that intensified chemotherapy followed by consolidating HCT-ASCT is superior to conventional chemotherapy with R-MP followed by maintenance with procarbazine in elderly patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL; not only regarding survival and remission after treatment but also regarding standards like quality of life (QOL) and treatment related morbidities. Results of this randomized trial will either change the standard of care to an intense and shorter treatment approach or re-define R-MP as a proven treatment standard. In addition, a geriatric assessement is implemented in this trial with the goal to better define transplant eligibility. If this trial shows the superiority of HCT-ASCT, the investigators will establish an improved treatment standard with increased chances for long-term remission and cure and reduced frequency and length of chemotherapy treatment. Considering the poor prognosis of this patient population, this randomized phase III trial is of great clinical importance to provide patients, the patients' families and care takers with optimal treatment.

A Global Phase III Study of Rilvegostomig or Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for First-Line Treatment of PD-L1-high Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

This is a Phase III, two-arm, randomized, double-blind, global, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab as a 1L treatment for patients with mNSCLC whose tumors express PD-L1.

Iberdomide Vs. Iberdomide Plus Isatuximab Maintenance Therapy Post ASCT in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Prospective, multicentre, randomised, parallel group, open, phase III clinical trial for a maintenance therapy, for patients who underwent an induction therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in the GMMG-HD8/DSMM XIX trial. Investigational Medicinal Product: Iberdomid (oral), isatuximab (subcutaneous administration via a wearable injector system). Randomisation will be performed centrally by GMMG/DSMM offices after verification of the eligibility of the patient. At the time of study inclusion, randomization will be performed into arm A (iberdomide) or arm B (iberdomide + isatuximab). Randomization will be stratified by centrally assessed MRD negativity status (yes vs. no vs. unknown); assessed by NGF from BMA; sensitivity of 10^-5; independent of standard IMWG response) and number of HDM/ASCT (single vs. tandem). Patients randomized in arm A will receive 39 cycles of the drug iberdomide, a Cereblon E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Modulating Drug (CELMoD®) that shares structural similarities to the immunomodulatory compounds (IMiDs) such as thalidomide and lenalidomide. Each cycle will last for 29 days. Patients in arm B will receive the same the 39 cycles of iberdomide plus monoclonal anti-CD38 antibody isatuximab subcutaneously. In both arms, patients will receive 20 mg dexamethasone in cycle 1, on the same days as the isatuximab administration in Arm B. End of study will be after 36 months of the maintenance therapy. There is one primary objective: - Demonstration of superiority of iberdomide plus isatuximab compared to iberdomide with respect to bone marrow minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rates (sensitivity 2x10^-6 via next-generation flow cytometry [NGF]) after two years of maintenance therapy. There is one key secondary objective: - PFS, defined as time from randomization to disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Further secondary objectives are: - Rates of sustained MRD negativity (at sensitivity levels of 10-5 and 2x10^-6 via NGF from BMA) after 1, 2 and 3 years of maintenance therapy. - Conversion from MRD positive to negative (at sensitivity levels of 10^-5 and 2x10^-6 via NGF from BMA). - Rates of best overall response to treatment (BOR). - Rates of partial response (PR), very good partial response (VGPR), complete response (CR) and stringent complete response (sCR). - Time-to-next-treatment (TTNT). - PFS on subsequent line of therapy. - Overall survival (OS). - Improvement of IMWG response categories (PR, VGPR, CR, sCR). - Proportions of patients in both treatment arms maintaining BOR and CR from baseline. - Assessment of quality-of-life (QoL) via the EORTC-QLQC30, EORTC-QLQMY20, and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires.

Randomized Trial in Adult de Novo Ph Positive ALL With Chemotherapy, Imatinib or Ponatinib, Blinatumomab and SCT

Register Schweres Asthma - German Asthma Net e.V.

Sociodemographic parameters (e.g., gender, date of birth) and medical parameters (diagnosis, therapy) are entered in the register. In addition, data on lung function, laboratory values (IgE and eosinophil granulocytes), asthma control (symptoms, nocturnal awakenings, on-demand medication, exacerbations), smoking status, and concomitant therapy (inhalable corticosteroids, bronchodilators, and systemic steroids) are collected. This information will be collected at the baseline visit, and then once a year at a follow up visit, for fifteen years. Participants will be assigned a unique study ID to protect the confidentiality of their personal health care information. Personal data and register data are on separate servers and thus meet the requirements of data protection. The primary purpose is to establish a clinical registry for patients with severe asthma. The number of patients with severe asthma at a single center or practice is usually small, so several centers (clinics and practices) in Germany have joined together to form the German Asthma Net e.V. to optimize the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of patients with severe asthma.

International Cooperative Treatment Protocol for Children and Adolescents With Lymphoblastic Lymphoma

The trial LBL 2018 is a collaborative prospective, multi-national, multi-center, randomized clinical trial for the treatment of children and adolescents with newly diagnosed lymphoblastic lymphoma. The LBL 2018 trial will be open for the qualified centers of following participating study Groups (core study cohort): AIEOP (Italy), BFM (Austria, Czech Republic, Germany, Switzerland), BSPHO (Belgium), CoALL (Germany), DCOG (The Netherlands), NOPHO (Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden), PPLLSG (Poland), SEHOP (Spain) and SFCE (France). HKPHOSG (Hong Kong), HPOG (Hungary), ISPHO (Israel), NSPHO (Moscow), SHOP (Portugal) and SPS (Slovak Republic) start patient recruitment into the extended study cohort (without randomization). Over the trial period study groups may switch from the extended study cohort to the core study cohort. Primary objectives: - Randomization R1, all patients eligible: To examine, whether the cumulative incidence of relapses with involvement of the CNS (CNS relapse, pCICR) can be decreased by a modified induction therapy including dexamethasone (experimental arm) instead of prednisone (standard arm) - Randomization R2, only patients with high risk LBL eligible: to examine, whether the probability of event-free survival (pEFS) in these patients can be improved by receiving an intensified treatment arm versus a standard treatment arm (as used in the EURO-LB 02) Patients are stratified into 3 different risk groups according to CNS status, immunophenotype, genetic markers and stage of disease at diagnosis: high risk group (HR), standard risk group I/II (SR I/II) and standard risk group (SR). Patients in the risk groups SR I/II and SR are randomized (R1) in two arms after a cytoreductive prephase with prednisone. Patients in standard arm receive the standard induction phase with prednisone. Patients in the experimental arm receive an induction phase with dexamethasone instead of prednisone. In SR group, induction phase is followed by the consolidation phase, the non-HR extra-compartment phase with HD-MTX (high-dose methotrexate), the reintensification phase and the maintenance therapy for the total therapy duration of 24 months. In SR I/II group, patients receive no reintensification phase. The Induction phase is followed by the consolidation phase, the non-HR extra-compartment phase and the maintenance therapy for the total therapy duration of 24 months. Patients in the HR group are eligible for randomization (R1) as outlined above. In addition high risk patients are eligible for second randomization (R2) at the end of induction phase. In the standard arm, HR-patients receive the consolidation phase and the non-HR extra-compartment phase. In the experimental arm, HR-patients receive a consolidation phase including two additional doses of PEG asparaginase and the HR-intensified extra-compartment phase consisting of two high risk courses alternating with two HD-MTX courses. Either phase is followed by the reintensification phase and the maintenance therapy for the total therapy duration of 24 months. Patients with involvement of the CNS (CNS positive) are stratified to the high risk group (HR) and are eligible for both randomizations (R1 and R2). Additionally, patients with CNS involvement (CNS positive) receive intensified intrathecal therapy. Intrathecal therapy consists of TIT (triple intrathecal therapy) after diagnosis of CNS involvement. TIT is administered twice weekly until clearance of blasts in the cerebrospinal fluid is achieved. Further intrathecal therapy is provided at the same points of time as for patients without CNS involvement, but TIT instead of MTX IT. In addition, patients receive four additional doses of TIT during maintenance. Cranial irradiation is omitted for patients with CNS involvement.

Comparison of Therapies Before Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Higher Risk MDS and Oligoblastic AML

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) is considered the only potentially curative treatment option for MDS patients and is therefore often considered the standard treatment for mainly higher-risk MDS patients up to the age of 75 years. One common approach to "bridge" higher-risk MDS from the time of diagnosis to transplantation is a treatment with hypomethylating agents such as azacitidine due to its anticipated low toxicity profile. Alternative strategies are intensive 7+3 chemotherapy with anthracycline and cytarabine or direct and immediate transplantation. By this strategy the time interval for donor search can be significantly prolonged leading to a higher proportion of success.Nevertheless, not every patient initially eligible for transplantation undergoes this procedure subsequently. A direct prospective comparison of different therapeutic approaches as outlined above versus CPX-351 prior to alloHCT has not been performed so far and is subject of the PALOMA trial. We hypothesize that CPX-351 will lead to higher and more durable response rates including a more favourable safety profile and long-term outcome compared to currently used conventional care regimens approaches prior to alloHCT.

Lifetech LAmbre™ Left Atrial Appendage Closure System Post-Market Registry

Detailed Description: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia causing ischemic stroke. The CHA2DS2-VASc score was developed to estimate the stroke rate in patients with non-valvular AF, and high scores predict a raised annual stroke risk. The yearly stroke risks without treatment in patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score 2 and 9 are 2.2% and 15.2% respectively. For patients with increased stroke risk (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≧2), warfarin or other novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) recommended for stroke prevention. Despite the effectiveness of current pharmacological therapies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, around 20% of patients discontinue therapy - whether new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) or warfarin because of side effects and/or bleeding. In addition, warfarin needs to be dosed individually to target an international normalized ratio (INR) of 2-3 for striking an optimal balance between bleeding and ischemic stroke events. This, combined with drug-drug interaction that occurs with both NOACs and warfarin, results in inadequate stroke protection in a substantial portion of AF patients. The LAA is the source of 90% of cardiac emboli attributed to stroke events. This is a windsock-like structure on the lateral border of the left atrium with internal trabeculations, and being a confined space, is prone to blood stasis and thrombus formation. Currently, there are surgical, epicardial and percutaneous techniques for occluding this structure in order to reduce stroke in AF patients cannot take long term oral anticoagulants, and the percutaneous route is intuitively the most attractive given its relative non-invasiveness. The two devices in most widespread use for percutaneous LAA closure worldwide are the Watchman (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) and the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP) (Abbott, IL, CA USA). However, both devices have limitations including the need for relatively large delivery sheaths (9-14 French) and limited recapture and repositioning capabilities. LAmbreTM LAA Closure System (Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China) is a novel self-expanding LAA occluder constructed from a nitinol mesh and polyester membranes and consists of an umbrella and a cover connected by a short central waist. The device is delivered by an 8-10 French sheath and has full recapture and repositioning capabilities. LAmbreTM LAA Closure System received the CE mark in June 2016. This PMCF study will be carried out following the CE mark of LAmbreTM LAA Closure System and is intended to confirm the effectiveness and safety of LAmbreTM LAA Closure System.

Prospective SPINE Registry

Efficacy of Venetoclax in Combination With Rituximab in Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia

In Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) chemotherapy induces only low CR/VGPR rates and response duration is limited. In addition, WM patients are often elderly, partly not tolerating chemotherapy related toxicities. Thus, innovative approaches are needed which combine excellent activity and tolerability in WM. Chemotherapy-free approaches are highly attractive for this patient group. Based on its high activity and favorable toxicity profile in indolent B-NHL such as CLL, Venetoclax was approved for the treatment of this diseases by the FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). First data in relapsed/refractory WM have documented high activity and low toxicity of Venetoclax also in WM, including patients with prior Ibrutinib treatment or patients carrying CXCR4 mutations. Ibrutinib itself has high activity and a relatively low toxicity profile in WM, but has also major disadvantages: the main disadvantage is the need to apply this drug continuously. Furthermore, Ibrutinib efficacy depends largely on the genotype with a substantial drop in major responses and PFS in the presence of CXCR4 mutations and non-mutated MYD88. In particular the need of continuous treatment for Ibrutinib has prevented that Ibrutinib has become the standard of care outcompeting conventional Rituximab/chemotherapy. This is reflected in current guidelines such as the NCCN and the ESMO guidelines, which still see immunochemotherapy as a backbone of treatment, largely because of the advantage of a timely fixed application. Data in CLL in the relapsed as well as in the first line setting have convincingly shown that in contrast to Ibrutinib Venetoclax is highly efficient also when used in a timely defined application scheme over 12 months in combination with the anti-CD20 antibody Rituximab. Data documented deep responses including molecular responses and a highly significant advantage over immunochemotherapy in large international Phase III trials, changing the standard of care in this disease. Based on this the hypothesis is that timely fixed application of the combination of Venetoclax and Rituximab induces significantly superior treatment outcomes compared to chemotherapy and Rituximab (DRC) in patients with treatment naïve WM, regardless of the genotype. A first indication for this assumption in the proposed trial will allow the performance of confirmatory phase 3 trials that might change the standard of care in WM. This study is an International phase II explorative, multicenter, open label, and randomized trial. The study will consist of an open labeled, stratified 1:1 randomization between Arm A and Arm B for de novo WM patients in need of treatment (phase II). Stratification factors are MYD88 and CXCR4 status (positive vs. negative). A stratified central block randomization will be used. The central randomization service will be used to avoid predictability of the treatment arm. The primary goal of this study is to explore the efficacy of Venetoclax plus Rituximab versus Dexamethasone/Cyclophosphamide/Rituximab in the treatment of de novo WM patients (Arm A vs. Arm B). 80 patients are planned to be recruited for this study at approcimately 30 sites in Germany, Greece and France.