Burgstadt , Sachs, Germany

A 52-Week Study of the Efficacy and Safety of BLU-5937 in Adults With Refractory Chronic Cough

The primary efficacy objective is to assess the effect of BLU-5937 on 24-hour cough frequency in adults with refractory chronic cough (including unexplained chronic cough) at 12 weeks.

Melanoma Margins Trial-II: 1cm v 2cm Wide Surgical Excision Margins for AJCC Stage II Primary Cutaneous Melanoma

This study will determine whether there is a difference in disease-free survival rates for patients with primary cutaneous melanoma with Breslow thickness > 2mm or 1-2mm with ulceration (pT2b-pT4b, AJCC 8th edition), treated with either a 1cm excision margin or 2cm margin. The study is designed to be able to prove or disprove that there is no difference in risk of the tumour recurring around the scar or anywhere else in the body between the two groups of patients. If the study shows no risk of tumour recurrence then we will also be able to determine how much of an impact the narrower excision has on patients in terms of improved quality of life and reduced side effects from the surgery and melanoma disease. This trial will also evaluate and determine the economic impact of narrower excision margins on the health services and society in general.

Management of Low-risk (Grade I and II) DCIS

Background of the study: The introduction of population-based breast cancer screening and implementation of digital mammography have led to an increased incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) without a decrease in the incidence of advanced breast cancer. This suggests DCIS overdiagnosis exists. We hypothesize that asymptomatic, low-risk DCIS (grade I and II DCIS) can safely be managed by active surveillance. If progression to invasive breast cancer would still occur, this will be lowgrade and hormone receptor positive with excellent survival rates. Also, breast-conserving treatment will still be an option, if no prior radiotherapy has been applied. It also may save many low-risk DCIS patients from intensive treatment. Objective of the study: The primary end-point is ipsilateral invasive breast tumor-free rate at 10 years. Secondary end-points are among others: overall survival, breast cancer-specific survival, mastectomy rate and patient reported outcomes. To determine whether low- risk DCIS can safely (measured by ipsilateral invasive breast cancer rate at 10 years) be managed by an active surveillance strategy or if the conventional treatment, being either wide local excision (WLE) only, WLE plus radiotherapy or mastectomy, possibly followed by hormonal therapy, will remain the standard of care. Study design: Phase III, open-label, non-inferiority, multi-center, non-randomized clinical trial. By patient's preference, women will be included into one of the following arms: active surveillance or standard treatment according to local policy, being either WLE alone, WLE plus radiotherapy or mastectomy, possibly followed by hormonal therapy. The same follow-up scheme will be applied in both study arms, i.e. annual mammography for a period of five years and an additional two mammograms at year seven and ten.

A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Dato-DXd With or Without Osimertinib Compared With Platinum Based Doublet Chemotherapy in Participants With EGFR-Mutated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

This is a Phase III, open-label, 3-arm, multicenter study assessing the effects of Dato-DXd in combination with osimertinib or Dato-DXd monotherapy versus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in participants with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation (EGFRm) locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose disease has progressed on prior osimertinib treatment. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of the following intervention groups: 1. Dato-DXd + osimertinib combination therapy 2. Dato-DXd monotherapy 3. Platinum-based doublet chemotherapy Participants will receive study intervention until Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) -defined radiological progression by the investigator, unacceptable toxicity, or other discontinuation criterion is met. After study intervention discontinuation, all participants will undergo an end of treatment (EoT) visit within 35 days of discontinuation and will be followed up for safety assessments 28 (+ 7) days after their last dose of study intervention.

Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Tozorakimab in Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With a History of Exacerbations (PROSPERO).

Participants who have completed the study treatment period and have not been prematurely discontinued from IP in one of the predecessor studies, OBERON or TITANIA, will be offered the opportunity to consent for this Multicentre, Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Phase 3 extension study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Tozorakimab versus placebo in adult (40 years and older) participants with symptomatic COPD and with a history of exacerbations

A Study of Milvexian in Participants After a Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome

A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Tezepelumab in Adult Participants With Moderate to Very Severe COPD (D5241C00007)

This is a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tezepelumab in adults with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receiving inhaled maintenance therapy and having had at least 2 moderate, or 1 severe, COPD exacerbations in the 12 months prior to Visit 1. Subjects will receive monthly subcutaneous injection of one of two different doses of tezepelumab, or placebo, with a maximum treatment duration of 76 weeks and a minimum of 52 weeks. The study also includes a off-treatment safety follow-up period of 12 weeks.

A Study to Evaluate Astegolimab in Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Enlicitide Decanoate (MK-0616 Oral PCSK9 Inhibitor) Cardiovascular Outcomes Study (MK-0616-015) CORALreef Outcomes

A Study of Zanubrutinib Plus Anti-CD20 Versus Lenalidomide Plus Rituximab in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Follicular or Marginal Zone Lymphoma