Montpellier - Cedex 5, France

A Study of Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (DVRd) Followed by Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel Versus Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (DVRd) Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) in Participants With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant plasma cell disorder characterized by the production of monoclonal immunoglobulin (Ig) proteins or protein fragments (M proteins) that have lost their function. JNJ-68284528 (ciltacabtagene autoleucel [cilta-cel]) is an autologous chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy that targets B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) that is being evaluated to treat participants with multiple myeloma. The primary hypothesis is that in transplant-eligible participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), cilta-cel will significantly improve progression-free survival (PFS) and Sustained MRD-negative CR rate compared with Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT). Approximately 750 participants (375 per arm) will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio into 2 arms.

A Study of JNJ-79635322 in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma or Previously Treated Amyloid Light-chain (AL) Amyloidosis

A Long-term Study for Participants Previously Treated With Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel

Cilta-cel (JNJ-68284528/LCAR-B38M chimeric antigen receptor T-cells [CAR-T]) is an autologous CAR-T therapy that targets B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), a molecule expressed on the surface of mature B lymphocytes and malignant plasma cells. There will be no treatment administered during the study and the data obtained from this study will help to assess whether there will be long-term cilta-cel-related toxicities. The study will consist of 2 phases: within the first 5 years after receiving the last dose of cilta-cel and Year 6 to 15 years after last dose of cilta-cel. Safety evaluations will include a review of adverse events, laboratory test results, and physical examination findings (including neurological examination). The duration of the study is up to 15 years after last dose of cilta-cel and participants will be followed at least once per year.

A Phase III Renal Outcomes and Cardiovascular Mortality Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Baxdrostat in Combination With Dapagliflozin in Participants With Chronic Kidney Disease and High Blood Pressure

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of baxdrostat in combination with dapagliflozin, compared with placebo and dapagliflozin, in reducing the risk of the composite of > 50% decline in eGFR, kidney failure, or CV death, in individuals with CKD and HTN. This study consists of a 4-week dapagliflozin Run-in Period for participants untreated with SGLT2i at screening, and a double-blinded period where participants will receive either baxdrostat/dapagliflozin or placebo/dapagliflozin. Site visits will take place at 2-, 4-, 8-, 16-, 34, and 52-weeks following randomisation. Thereafter visits will occur approximately every 4 months. The study closure procedures will be initiated when the predetermined number of primary endpoint events is predicted to have occurred ie, the PACD. All randomised participants including any participants who have prematurely discontinued study intervention will be scheduled for a SCV within a few weeks of the PACD. This period can be extended by the Sponsor. In case of premature discontinuation of blinded study intervention, participants will continue in the study and receive dapagliflozin 10 mg, unless the participant meets dapagliflozin specific discontinuation criteria. If study intervention is temporarily or permanently discontinued, the participant should remain in the study, and it is important that the scheduled study visits (including the PTDV for participants with permanent discontinuation of study intervention) and data collection continue according to the study protocol until the SCV.

A Study to Assess the Effect of Dexpramipexole in Adolescents and Adults With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma.

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dexpramipexole in adults and adolescents with severe, inadequately controlled asthma with eosinophilic phenotype on medium to high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS )and at least one additional asthma controller medication with or without oral corticosteroids (OCS). Approximately 1400 participants will be randomized globally. Participants will receive dexpramipexole, or placebo, administered orally, over a 52-week treatment period. The study also includes a post-treatment follow-up period of 4 weeks.

Open-label Study Comparing Iberdomide, Daratumumab and Dexamethasone (IberDd) Versus Daratumumab, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (DVd) in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

This is a multicenter, two-stage, randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of iberdomide in combination with dexamethasone and daratumumab (IberDd) versus daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd) in participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Approximately 200 patients randomized in stage 1 to one of three iberdomide dose levels of 1, 1.3, or 1.6 mg in combination with daratumumab and dexamethasone (Treatment Arms A1, A2, or A3), or to the DVd comparator arm (Treatment Arm B). In Stage 2 of the study, approximately 664 additional subjects will be randomized 1:1 between 2 treatment arms: - Approximately 332 subjects will be randomized to receive Treatment Arm A (IberDd) - Approximately 332 subjects will be randomized to receive Treatment Arm B (DVd) Participants in both treatment arms will continue to receive treatment until confirmed progressive disease (PD), unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. To ensure accuracy and completeness of the primary endpoint assessment of progression-free survival (PFS), participants who permanently discontinue study treatment for any reason, other than confirmed PD or withdrawal of consent, will continue to be followed for disease assessment. The study will be conducted in compliance with International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) and Good Clinical Practices (GCPs).

A Study to Compare Iberdomide Maintenance Versus Lenalidomide Maintenance Therapy Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Participants With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Safety and Efficacy Study of OPC-415 in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

A Study Comparing Talquetamab Plus Pomalidomide, Talquetamab Plus Teclistamab, and Elotuzumab, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone or Pomalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Myeloma Who Have Received an Anti-CD38 Antibody and Lenalidomide

A Study of Teclistamab in Combination With Daratumumab and Lenalidomide (Tec-DR) and Talquetamab in Combination With Daratumumab and Lenalidomide (Tal-DR) in Participants With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma