Marquion, France

Ziconotide for Non-cancer Pain by Intrathecal Administration

Phase II Efficacy Study of Repotrectinib in Frail and/or Elderly Patients With ROS1-rearranged Advanced NSCLC

This is a national, multicenter, phase II, prospective, open label, non-randomized, interventional study. Frail (PS≥2) and/or elderly patients (≥70 years) with histologically/cytologically proven stage IV or stage III non-eligible to local treatment NSCLC harboring an ROS1 gene rearrangement treated by Repotrectinib (160 mg twice a day (BID), until progression or unacceptable toxicity) in first or any line.

Impact of an Early and Extended Rehabilitation Program Combining Individually Tailored Nutrition and Physical Activities on Patient Outcomes After Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Vasopressor Therapy in the ICU

Design and Evaluation of an Individualized Biodrug Tapering Strategy Based on Biodrug Dosage: the MONITORA Study

Antimicrobial Therapy for Difficult-to-treat Pseudomonas Aeruginosa

Infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with acquired resistances to all first-line antipseudomonal beta-lactams and fluoroquinolones (difficult-to-treat isolates - DTR), pose serious therapeutical challenges, especially in critically ill and/or immunocompromised patients. Certain new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BL/BLI (beta lactamine/ beta lactamase inhibitor) - i.e., ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, others) and cefiderocol have shown promising results for the treatment of infections due to DTR P. aeruginosa. However, multicenter data on their real-life utilization in this indication are still scarce. The ADDICT study is a prospective, multicenter cohort study including unselected patients with DTR P. aeruginosa infection requiring definite intravenous antimicrobial therapy. The primary objective of the study is to investigate the clinical efficacy of available options (new BL/BLI, cefiderocol or older agents such as aminoglycosides and colistin) in this population. Secondary objectives are to compare the clinical and microbiological efficacy of available options in infections due to DTR P. aeruginosa with in vitro susceptibility to more than one last-resort drug, to compare the incidence of non-ecological adverse events observed with these drugs, to assess the incidence of resistance emergence under therapy and to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of resistance emergence, to assess the benefits and risks of combination therapy in this indication, to compare the acquisition rates of multidrug-resistant bacteria other than DTR P. aeruginosa, and Clostridioides difficile infection, to compare Day-28 and in-hospital all-cause mortality rates. Patients will be recruited in 60 hospital centers contributing to four French networks of research in infectious diseases and critical care (CRICS-TRIGGERSEP, ReaRezo, OutcomeRéa, RENARCI - PROMISE metanetwork). Clinical variables will be collected through an electronic case-report form. DTR P. aeruginosa isolates will be sent to the National Reference Center of Antimicrobial Resistance in P. aeruginosa for centralized analyses (extended antimicrobial susceptibility testing, MLST, whole-genome sequencing of successive isolates if resistance emergence under therapy).

Best Hypnotic Drug Choice for Rapid Sequence Induction in the Operating Room

Interest of Simulation Training on the Announcement of Early Pregnancy Loss on the Psychological Impact of the Patients

Validation of KELIM as a Predictive/Prognostic Factor for Maintenance Treatment With iPARP in First-Line Ovarian Cancer

PICO Venous Leg Ulcers (VLU) Reimbursement Study

This is a national, multicentre, pragmatic, randomized, controlled superiority study in which PICO treatment with compression therapy will be compared against Standard of Care (i.e. traditional wound dressings with compression therapy). There will be two parallel treatment arms with a 1:1 allocation ratio and a stratification on wound duration and size. There will be an additional blind assessment for the primary outcome measure. Approximately 37 investigational sites located in France will be enrolled. At each site, a community-based practitioner (general practitioner or specialist) will be enrolled as Principal Investigator (PI). District nurses will be responsible for providing wound care in homecare setting. Duly informed and eligible patients will complete an inclusion visit after which they will enter in a 2-week run-in period in which subjects will be treated with standard of care. After these 2 weeks of run-in, eligibility to randomization will be assessed using pre-specified criteria listed in the protocol, that aim to confirm that the wound does not respond to an adequately conducted standard of care in a satisfactory manner, including subject compliance with compression therapy. Upon randomization, baseline data will be collected, and each subject will be followed-up by the PI for 12 weeks. The PI will conduct 3 visits, i.e., at Week 4 (D28±3 days), Week 8 (D56±3 days), and Week 12 (D84±3 days). Relevant study data will be collected at these visits. In the event wound healing is observed during the 12-week follow-up period of the study either by the PI or by the home care nurse, a Wound Healing Confirmation Visit needs to be conducted with the PI 2 weeks later (±3 days) to confirm that the wound is still healed. Only wounds still healed at the wound healing confirmation visit will be counted as "healed" in the primary endpoint analysis. This means that for wounds that are not healed by Week 12, the visit with the PI at Week 12 will be the final study visit for the subject. Following, because a Wound Healing Confirmation Visit needs to be conducted 2 weeks (±3 days) following the initial observation of wound healing, which can occur at any time throughout the 12 week follow-up period, the Wound Healing Confirmation Visit can occur at any time as well, but at the latest 2 weeks (±3 days) following the visit at Week 12, i.e. at week 14±3 days. In between study visits with the PI, patients are cared for at home by their home care nurse who will also be trained on the study. The study nurse will be collecting study related data as well using a secure mobile application.

Minimal Residual Disease-based Strategy with T-Cell Redirector After Treatment with Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (D-VRd) in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma