Clohars-carnoët, France

Genetic Determinants of Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage (POLYGENDOMUS)

Elite-level sports expose athletes to training loads designed to induce muscle damage, aiming to achieve optimal physiological adaptations. However, the repetitive nature of such damage increases the risk of injury. The ability to assess an athlete's susceptibility to fragility is therefore crucial for optimizing their training and performance. Genetic factors appear to play a significant role in the occurrence of these injuries, particularly through subtle variations in DNA sequences. Depending on the location of these variations within a gene, they may or may not alter the expression or function of the associated protein. The investigators aimed to investigate the relationship between genetic polymorphisms and biological parameters in the context of exercise-induced muscle damage.

Efficacy of a Phone-based Relapse Prevention for Anorexia Nervosa After a First Hospitalization

Venetoclax in Children With Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Relapse of AML is driven by chemotherapy resistant stem cells. One mechanism of chemotherapeutic resistance in AML is the overexpression of the protein B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2), an anti-apoptotic protein which sequesters intracellular activators of apoptosis. Venetoclax is a selective, potent, orally bioavailable, small molecule inhibitor of BCL-2 that restores programmed cell death in cancer cells. This is a trial for children, adolescents and young adults with 2nd relapsed AML or 1st relapsed AML unable to receive additional anthracycline. This is randomized trial of venetoclax in combination with intensive chemotherapy (fludarabine/cytarabine/gemtuzumab ozogamicin) for the first two cycles (42-day-cycles) that would inform and evaluate if this agent is an effective option for this population to improve its poor prognosis. Participants can receive up to two cycles of induction chemotherapy before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). If participants who have perceived clinical benefit cannot be transplanted after the 2 cycles, maintenance treatment may be given at the discretion of the investigator. In Arm B (experimental arm), participants can continue venetoclax if they have perceived clinical benefit, and maintenance therapy will combine venetoclax with azacitidine for a maximum of 24 cycles. In Arm A (control arm), participants will receive azacitidine in monotherapy. Maintenance is continued until clinical progression or unacceptable toxicity with a maximum of 24 cycles.

Respiratory Rehabilitation for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

The purpose of this study is to perform a comparative analysis of the clinical and medico-economic effectiveness of center-based RR versus home-based RR in the departments of Nord and Pas de Calais in France. All COPD patients eligible for RR and willing to participate in the study will be followed. Patient preferences will be evaluated at inclusion. After presentation of both RR modalities, patients expressing a strong preference for one or other of the terms will be taken care of according to their wishes. Indifferent patients between the two RR modalities will be randomized. This design is justified in the light of three cases: - It is impossible to evaluate blind intervention, - The effectiveness of RR depends on patient preferences, - Patients' adherence to the protocol is facilitated.

A Study to Test the Safety and Tolerability of Brivaracetam in Children and Adolescents With Seizures

EP0156 is designed to assess the long-term safety and tolerability of BRV in pediatric study participants with epilepsy who participated in the neonatal study N01349 [NCG03325439] and/or have participated in the open-label, long-term, follow-up pediatric study N01266 [NCT01364597]. EP0156 will also assess the long-term safety and tolerability of BRV in Japanese pediatric study participants with partial-onset seizures who will be directly enrolled into the study in Japan. Pharmacokinetic data will also be evaluated in Japanese study participants.

PICO Venous Leg Ulcers (VLU) Reimbursement Study

This is a national, multicentre, pragmatic, randomized, controlled superiority study in which PICO treatment with compression therapy will be compared against Standard of Care (i.e. traditional wound dressings with compression therapy). There will be two parallel treatment arms with a 1:1 allocation ratio and a stratification on wound duration and size. There will be an additional blind assessment for the primary outcome measure. Approximately 37 investigational sites located in France will be enrolled. At each site, a community-based practitioner (general practitioner or specialist) will be enrolled as Principal Investigator (PI). District nurses will be responsible for providing wound care in homecare setting. Duly informed and eligible patients will complete an inclusion visit after which they will enter in a 2-week run-in period in which subjects will be treated with standard of care. After these 2 weeks of run-in, eligibility to randomization will be assessed using pre-specified criteria listed in the protocol, that aim to confirm that the wound does not respond to an adequately conducted standard of care in a satisfactory manner, including subject compliance with compression therapy. Upon randomization, baseline data will be collected, and each subject will be followed-up by the PI for 12 weeks. The PI will conduct 3 visits, i.e., at Week 4 (D28±3 days), Week 8 (D56±3 days), and Week 12 (D84±3 days). Relevant study data will be collected at these visits. In the event wound healing is observed during the 12-week follow-up period of the study either by the PI or by the home care nurse, a Wound Healing Confirmation Visit needs to be conducted with the PI 2 weeks later (±3 days) to confirm that the wound is still healed. Only wounds still healed at the wound healing confirmation visit will be counted as "healed" in the primary endpoint analysis. This means that for wounds that are not healed by Week 12, the visit with the PI at Week 12 will be the final study visit for the subject. Following, because a Wound Healing Confirmation Visit needs to be conducted 2 weeks (±3 days) following the initial observation of wound healing, which can occur at any time throughout the 12 week follow-up period, the Wound Healing Confirmation Visit can occur at any time as well, but at the latest 2 weeks (±3 days) following the visit at Week 12, i.e. at week 14±3 days. In between study visits with the PI, patients are cared for at home by their home care nurse who will also be trained on the study. The study nurse will be collecting study related data as well using a secure mobile application.