Cedex 15, France

A Phase III Renal Outcomes and Cardiovascular Mortality Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Baxdrostat in Combination With Dapagliflozin in Participants With Chronic Kidney Disease and High Blood Pressure

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of baxdrostat in combination with dapagliflozin, compared with placebo and dapagliflozin, in reducing the risk of the composite of > 50% decline in eGFR, kidney failure, or CV death, in individuals with CKD and HTN. This study consists of a 4-week dapagliflozin Run-in Period for participants untreated with SGLT2i at screening, and a double-blinded period where participants will receive either baxdrostat/dapagliflozin or placebo/dapagliflozin. Site visits will take place at 2-, 4-, 8-, 16-, 34, and 52-weeks following randomisation. Thereafter visits will occur approximately every 4 months. The study closure procedures will be initiated when the predetermined number of primary endpoint events is predicted to have occurred ie, the PACD. All randomised participants including any participants who have prematurely discontinued study intervention will be scheduled for a SCV within a few weeks of the PACD. This period can be extended by the Sponsor. In case of premature discontinuation of blinded study intervention, participants will continue in the study and receive dapagliflozin 10 mg, unless the participant meets dapagliflozin specific discontinuation criteria. If study intervention is temporarily or permanently discontinued, the participant should remain in the study, and it is important that the scheduled study visits (including the PTDV for participants with permanent discontinuation of study intervention) and data collection continue according to the study protocol until the SCV.

A Study of JNJ-90301900 in Combination With Chemoradiation Followed by Consolidation Immunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Testing Longer Duration Radiation Therapy Versus the Usual Radiation Therapy in Patients With Cancer That Has Spread to the Brain

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To determine if the time to local failure is improved with FSRS compared to SRS in patients with intact (i.e., unresected) brain metastases. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare time to intracranial progression-free survival between FSRS and SRS. II. To compare overall survival between FSRS and SRS. III. To determine if the time to local failure is improved with FSRS compared to SRS, as evaluated by central review of imaging. IV. To evaluate if there is any difference in central nervous system (CNS) failure patterns (local versus [vs.] distant brain failure vs. both) in patients who receive FSRS compared to patients who receive SRS. V. To compare the rates of radiation necrosis in patients who receive FSRS vs. SRS. VI. To compare the time to salvage whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) between patients who receive FSRS and those who receive SRS. VII. To compare the rates of post-treatment adverse events associated with FSRS and SRS. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients undergo SRS over 30-90 minutes for 1 fraction on study. Additionally, patients undergo computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on study. ARM II: Patients undergo FSRS over 30-90 minutes for 3 fractions on study. Additionally, patients undergo CT and MRI on study. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 1 year, every 4 months for 1 year then every 6 months for 3 years.

PRESERVE & CONNECT: Impact Study of the BPC

The proposed study will determine the efficacy of the BPC at improving the lives of families with a significant history of trauma and establish the evidence base to allow the BPC to be listed on the Title IV-E Clearing House. The specific research questions that will be answered as are as follows: Question 1: Does the BPC improve Child Safety? Hypothesis 1a: Parents who complete the BPC will have fewer substantiated of child maltreatment as per administrative records. Hypothesis 1b: Parents who complete the BPC will report less psychologically aggressive and abusive parenting behaviors (Parenting Scale). Question 2: Does the BPC improve Child Permanency? Hypothesis 2a: Parents who complete the BPC will have fewer out of family placements and placement disruptions as per administrative records. Hypothesis 2b: Parents who complete the BPC will have stability or permanency with their family of origin as per administrative records. Question 3: Does the BPC improve Child Well-Being? Hypothesis 3: Parents who complete the BPC will report improved behavioral and emotional functioning of their children (Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire). Question 4: Does the BPC improve Adult Well-Being? Hypothesis 4a: Parents who complete the BPC will report improved use of parenting practices to improve the functional relationship with their children (Parenting Self-Efficacy Scale; Parent Stress Index, Parent-Child Relationship Scales). Hypothesis 4b: Parents who complete the BPC will report improved understanding of the influence of trauma on their parenting behaviors and wellness (Trauma-Informed Knowledge and Parenting Skills Survey). Question 5: Are the improvements of the BPC associated with demographic factors? Exploratory Analysis 5a: Examine the association between measures of child safety, child well-being, child permanency, and adult well-being and measures of acculturation. Exploratory Analysis 5a: Examine the association between measures of child safety, child well-being, child permanency, and adult well-being and measures of acculturation

Fatty Acid Modulation of Brain Function in Older Adults

This study will examine how manipulating dietary fatty acids affects brain functioning in older adults. Prior studies have shown that there are behavioral changes that can be made to improve cognition in adults on an acute time scale including improving sleep and physical activity. Based on preclinical data and prior studies in humans the investigators propose that brain functioning also can be acutely improved with a reduction in dietary saturated fat. This approach will first be used in cognitively normal older adults without dementia, but in the future it may be that improving baseline cognition is beneficial in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease even if the overall course of the patient's neurological condition is increasingly impaired cognitive function. The investigators will manipulate the dietary ratios of palmitic acid (PA) and oleic acid (OA), which are the most prevalent saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids, respectively in the diet and body lipids. Using a crossover study of men and women, aged 65-75 years, the investigators will administer two experimental diets in a random order for one week and each experimental diet will be preceded by a one-week, low fat control diet for a four-week total study period. One experimental diet will have a high PA/OA ratio typical of the usual North American Diet and the other experimental diet will have a low PA/OA ratio typical of the Mediterranean Diet. The following primary outcomes will be assessed: working memory performance, activation of working memory networks using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and functional connectivity. The impact of this study is that these data may suggest one mechanism for acutely improving cognition in healthy older adults and potentially in those with cognitive impairment such as mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. While changing dietary behavior long term requires additional investigation, there are potential immediate benefits to acute improvements in cognition on quality of life for older adults.

Accelerated Pulmonary Rehabilitation in the Preoperative Period

The benefits of pulmonary rehab (PR) prior to lung resection have not been well-studied in the population that could benefit from it the most, patients with COPD who smoke. This study would be innovative in two major ways. First, the impact of prehab in those who smoke could be established. Secondly, the optimal model of prehab, which meets the clinical needs of the patient in the pre-surgical window, and aligns with the current model of PR, could be determined. Screening and Recruitment Investigators estimate that 20 participants over a two-year period will be sufficient to measure the safety and feasibility of this study. Investigators aim to enroll, on average, 2 participants per month in order to complete this study in a timely fashion. Participants will be enrolled in prehab on a rolling basis, as to not delay surgical timeline. Some procedures will be performed as a component of standard of care and some will be for research purposes only. This distinction is outlined in the sections below. Intake and Baseline Assessment After informed consent, participants will complete the initial assessment with study coordinator. This will include anthropometrics, demographics like age, sex, race and ethnicity, and other sociodemographic and economic characteristics such as education, marital status, income, etc. This assessment will also include thorough medical, and surgical review, healthcare resource utilization, medication usage, substance use and smoking history, specifically recall of average cigarettes per day, carbon monoxide measurements, Fagerström nicotine dependence scale, and readiness to change. Investigators will also administer the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) questionnaire to assess for anxiety. Following intake, participants will be enrolled in the prehab program, which will include standard of care intake measurements including 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), mMRC, SGRQ, short physical performance battery (SPPB), and PHQ-9. For ease of the patient, Investigators will offer that this be performed on the same day, in a private medical setting at the PR facility. If the patient chooses, Investigators can offer intake at the Vermont Lung Center on a separate day. Prehab Prehab will include 2, one-hour sequential sessions of PR per day as is standard, however this intervention will increase the frequency from 2 days to 4 days per week, for 2 weeks, thus completing 16 sessions of PR prior to or in the early stages of treatment. An exercise prescription will be written by the medical director based on initial 6MWD, age, height, weight, and co-morbidities, as is standard of care. Prior to each session, patients are evaluated for symptoms and vital signs are measured. Exercise will include 30 minutes of warm-up and upper and lower extremity resistance training, either against gravity or with resistance bands as appropriate. Exercise will then move to the open gym, where patients utilize endurance equipment of their choosing, such as a treadmill or recumbent bicycle. As with traditional PR, participants will be given online education videos regarding lung health to complete at home, with a supplementary video on breathing techniques to reduce atelectasis from pain. Virtual synchronous home-based PR will be offered to patients who have barriers to in-center PR. Smoking Cessation Intervention Regarding smoking cessation, patients will be offered and prescribed the gold standard therapies in an attempt at smoking cessation, including a one-hour individual counseling session with a mental health therapist trained in smoking cessation therapy, varenicline treatment, dual acting NRT, and referral to the state smoking cessation program. Education modules on the benefits of smoking cessation will also be created for participants to review in the education portion of prehab. None of these interventions will be required, but offered as is standard of care. Assessments Post-Prehab and 30 Days Post-Treatment Following completion of prehab prior to lung resection surgery Pulmonary Rehabilitation standard of care assessments and research-based assessments will be repeated. This will include interim health history, healthcare resource utilization, and medication usage, assessment for adverse events and COPD exacerbations, substance use and smoking status including recall of average cigarettes per day, carbon monoxide measurements, Fagerström nicotine dependence scale, readiness to change, GAD-7 and the study evaluation. 30 days following lung cancer treatment, the study team will review the participants medical record for any adverse events.

Efficacy and Safety of a New Formulation of Oral Cladribine Compared With Placebo in Participants With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis (MyClad)

A Study Comparing Niraparib With Temozolomide in Adult Participants With Newly-diagnosed, MGMT Unmethylated Glioblastoma

A Study to Investigate Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Tolebrutinib in Participants With Multiple Sclerosis.

Participants with relapsing MS from the Phase 2b LTS16004 parent study will continue open-label (OL) tolebrutinib. All participants from the Phase 3 parent studies (EFC16033, EFC16034, EFC16645, and EFC16035) will learn which treatment they received in the parent study: - If from one of the Phase 3 relapsing MS studies and on teriflunomide, an accelerated elimination procedure or a 3-month washout period is required prior to starting OL tolebrutinib. If on teriflunomide, and benefiting and recommended by the Investigator, the participant may opt to continue teriflunomide outside of the LTS17043 study, if clinically appropriate. If on tolebrutinib, the participant will continue tolebrutinib. - All participants from one of the Phase 3 progressive MS studies will start OL tolebrutinib. - If a participant already started OL tolebrutinib in the Phase 3 parent study this will be continued. - RMS participants who are not eligible for OL tolebrutinib per Health Authority and/or ethics committee decisions on the study conduct (ie, partial hold on initiation of tolebrutinib) will continue their parent study treatment assignment as per their randomization from the parent study. The treatment duration per participant will be approximately 3 years of OL tolebrutinib.

DFP-10917 in Combination With Venetoclax in Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

This study is a Phase I/II, open-label trial exploring dosage and expansion cohorts to assess the safety and preliminary efficacy of DFP-10917 in combination with venetoclax for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). DFP-10917 will be administered as a 14-day continuous intravenous infusion starting on Day 1, followed by a 14-day rest period, during each 28-day cycle. This will occur concurrently with venetoclax, administered orally at a dose of 400 mg daily for 14 days following a dose ramp-up phase (100 mg and 200 mg on Day 1 and 2, respectively). In Phase I, the starting dose for DFP-10917 is 4 mg/m²/day, administered concurrently with 400 mg of venetoclax once daily for 14 days (Dose Level 1). The Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) will assess dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) after three patients are enrolled at this dose level and the last patient has completed the 4-week safety assessment period (i.e., one cycle of the combination regimen). At Dose Level 1 (4 mg/m²/day of DFP-10917 with venetoclax 400 mg daily for 14 days), if none of the three patients experience a DLT, the study will enroll an additional three patients at this dose level to confirm the combination's safety and tolerability. If one out of three patients experiences a DLT, up to three additional patients may be enrolled. If one or fewer out of six treated patients experience a DLT at Dose Level 1, this dose will be declared the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) and used in the Phase II expansion cohort. If two or more patients out of the total three to six patients at Dose Level 1 experience a DLT, the study will continue enrollment at Dose Level 1 (4 mg/m²/day of DFP-10917 for 14 days concurrently with venetoclax 400 mg daily for 10 days of each 28-day cycle) to determine the safety and tolerability of Dose Level -1. A patient who discontinues therapy during Cycle 1 without experiencing DLTs is considered evaluable for safety purposes only if all scheduled doses of DFP-10917 and at least 80% of the venetoclax doses were administered in the first cycle. Once the RP2D of DFP-10917 in combination with venetoclax is determined, the expansion cohort will begin enrollment to evaluate the anti-leukemia efficacy of this combination. A Simon's two-stage min-max design will be employed, with up to 17 patients expected to participate.