Bellegarde Sur Valserine, France

Impact of an Early and Extended Rehabilitation Program Combining Individually Tailored Nutrition and Physical Activities on Patient Outcomes After Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Vasopressor Therapy in the ICU

Asciminib Prospective Non Interventional Study as 3rd Line Therapy or More to Treat Adult Patients With CML- CP in Real World Setting in France

The ASSURE-3 study is a national, multicentric, non-interventional, prospective study in real-life conditions with primary data collection in adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (Ph+ CML-CP) previously treated with two or more Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs). It will be conducted in France with hematologists, onco-hematologists, physicians with documented involvement in managing Ph+ CML-CP patients in routine practice, practicing in public or private health care institutions. Each patient will be followed during 15 months at M0, M1 and then every 3 months (rhythm of visits according to the routine clinical care), or until premature discontinuation of asciminib treatment. Historical data will be abstracted retrospectively by the participating physicians from patient files, to collect information using an electronic case report form (eCRF). Primary data will be collected during inclusion and follow-up visits

A Trial to Learn if Odronextamab Combined With Chemotherapy is Safe and Well-Tolerated and How Well it Works Compared to Rituximab Combined With Chemotherapy for Adult Participants With Follicular Lymphoma

Assessment of the Quality of Life of Multiple Sclerosis Patients Treated With Ofatumumab in Real-life in France

This is a non-interventional, prospective (primary data), multicenter study conducted in metropolitan France. The primary objective of this study is to describe the quality of life of MS patients after initiation of treatment with ofatumumab. In order to form a representative sample of MS patients taking into account the terms of care in France, free or practicing neurologists in healthcare institutions (public or private) in different regions of France will be selected to participate in this study. The study will enroll adult patients with MS who initiated ofatumumab according to the physician's advice and independently of the study. Patients will be followed from initiation of ofatumumab either until (i) 12 months (± 1month) after initiation of ofatumumab (End of Study), or until (ii) discontinuation of treatment with ofatumumab prior to the completion of the 12-month follow-up (early termination); whichever occurs first (end of study or early termination).

French Observational Study of Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma in Real-World Settings

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most frequent form of leukemia in the Western World. The disease is characterized by the accumulation and proliferation of mature, monoclonal, CD5+ B-cells with specific immunophenotype in the peripheral blood (above 5x109/L), bone marrow and secondary lymphoid organs. Small lymphocytic leukemia (SLL) is characterized by similar tumor cells but without increased lymphocyte count. In Europe, CLL has been identified as the second most frequent hematological malignancies after multiple myeloma (Eurocare 5 study) and its standardized incidence in the world has been estimated to be 4/100000 person-years for men and 2.1/100000 person-years for women. In France, 4674 new cases have been observed in 2018 (FRANCIM). A proportion of patients can initially be monitored only while others with symptomatic disease at diagnosis or during follow-up require therapies. The management of these patients have considerably changed over the last decade. Indeed, beyond chemo-immunotherapy, multiple targeted therapies have been approved on the basis of phase 2 and randomized phase 3 clinical trials and have subsequently been used in daily practice. The management of patients with SLL is similar to that of those with CLL. In addition to therapeutic advances, the advent of new sequencing technologies has also identified CLL genetic features that are now being incorporated in patient routine evaluation. Conventional chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) has been the long-standing option for CLL patient without TP53 disruption and different regimens have emerged depending on patient comorbidities (fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab, FCR; bendamustin-rituximab, BR; GA101-chloraminophene, G-CLB). These regimens fail to be effective in patients with TP53 disruption and alternative strategies are proposed for them. The CLL therapeutic panel is now enriched by oral kinase inhibitors targeting the B-cell receptor signaling. The Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) have been shown to provide prolonged response, even in cases where CIT usually failed, such as patients harboring TP53 disruption. In relapsed/refractory patients, median PFS with the BTKi ibrutinib is 44 months. In the frontline setting, ibrutinib has recently been shown to result in superior PFS and less infectious complications than standard CIT regimens. The advent of the BCL2 (B-cell lymphoma 2) inhibitor venetoclax has recently added another option for the treatment of CLL patients. BCL2 is an antiapoptotic molecule governing mitochondrial apoptosis and is strongly expressed in CLL cells. Inhibiting BCL2 with venetoclax as monotherapy led to 79% response rate in the relapse/refractory setting. Combining venetoclax to rituximab demonstrated better PFS than bendamustine-rituximab in relapsed/refractory patients. However, these treatment approaches also come with new challenges that are difficult to-address in phase 3 clinical trials and that deserve larger scale studies and longer follow-up. The emergence of drug resistance, the changes of safety profiles to deal with in routine practice and the observance of these orally administered drugs are emerging as new concerns. How these compounds change the incidence of typical CLL complication such as Richter transformation, immune cytopenias and infections remains to be determined. A growing body of concerns is also raising regarding the unlimited administration of some of this the compounds (costs, resistance, tolerance). Finally, the optimal order of use of these drugs is unknown. The advent of the BCL2 (B-cell lymphoma 2) inhibitor venetoclax has recently added another option for the treatment of CLL patients 11,12. BCL2 is an antiapoptotic molecule governing mitochondrial apoptosis and is strongly expressed in CLL cells. Inhibiting BCL2 with venetoclax as monotherapy led to 79% response rate in the relapse/refractory setting. Combining venetoclax to rituximab demonstrated better PFS than bendamustine-rituximab in relapsed/refractory patients12. However, these treatment approaches also come with new challenges that are difficult to-address in phase 3 clinical trials and that deserve larger scale studies and longer follow-up. The emergence of drug resistance, the changes of safety profiles to deal with in routine practice and the observance of these orally administered drugs are emerging as new concerns. How these compounds change the incidence of typical CLL complication such as Richter transformation, immune cytopenias and infections remains to be determined. A growing body of concerns is also raising regarding the unlimited administration of some of this the compounds (costs, resistance, tolerance). Finally, the optimal order of use of these drugs is unknown. Primary objective : Setting a prospective cohort of real-world CLL/SLL patients with symptomatic disease in order to evaluate medical practices and their change and representativity over time. Secondary objectives : Overall survival and long-term toxicity, Response and PFS at each line of therapy, Impact of therapeutic trajectories on patient outcome, Representativity of the studied population

Biological Diagnosis and Monitoring of Chronic Nitrous Oxide Abuse

Prognostic Analyses on a Validation Series of Patients with Waldenström's Disease

Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) is defined by the association of bone marrow lymphoplasmocytic infiltration and monoclonal immunoglobulin M (IgM). A mutation in the MYD88 gene is found in up to 90% of patients, and a mutation in the CXCR4 gene in approximately one third of patients. Treatment should be initiated in cases of cytopenia, bulky disease or when the physicochemical or immunological properties of IgM explain the occurrence of amyloidosis, cryoglobulin, neurological manifestations, or hyperviscosity syndrome (due to the presence of a large amount of IgM). However, approximately 30% of patients are diagnosed without any symptom and therefore they do not meet the criteria for initiating treatment. The prognosis of asymptomatic patients can be estimated with a prognostic index based on serum albumin, β2-microglobulin, the monoclonal component concentration and the bone marrow infiltration. Prognostic assessment of these patients could be improved by taking into account prior the free light chain concentrations and the molecular characteristics of the disease. At the time of initiation of the first treatment, the prognosis is usually estimated with the International Prognostic Index (IPSSWM) which is based on five variables: age, platelet count, haemoglobin concentrations, β2-microglobulin and monoclonal component concentration. Serum albumin and LDH levels also retain a prognostic role and these two characteristics have been incorporated in a proposal for a revision of this index. Thus improving prognostic assessment in patients with WM may rest on the following strategies: - Modifying the variables to be considered before treatment initiation, particularly by considering albumin and lactate dehydrogenase concentrations or molecular characteristics of the disease in symptomatic patients, free-light chain concentration in asymptomatic patients and molecular abnormalities in both categories of patients. - Evaluating the prognostic impact of events occurring during the course of treatment, such as response or progression in symptomatic patients. Improving prognostic assessment at the time of the first treatment initiation and taking into account the prognostic impact of events occurring in the course of evolution, should improve the strength of treatment decision at the time of initial treatment and during the follow-up. It should also help to design clinical trial for fast and effective evaluation of new treatments. Our work should also help to adjust clinical monitoring of asymptomatic patients. Two large subgroups of patients properly included with validated information and updated follow-up will be considered, namely: symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. This project is based on the assumption that it should be possible for each of these two cohorts to: 1. validate a new prognostic system and compare its performance with previous systems 2. to participate in a large international study of the validity of a surrogate endpoint of survival after initiation of the 1st treatment

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) and Coronavirus Disease (COVID) 19

The main objective of this study is to evaluate the hospital survival of COVID-19 patients supported by venovenous or venoarterial ECMO in a multicenter registry. The secondary objectives are to describe the characteristics of COVID-19 patients who have received ECMO support, to identify the risk factors associated with hospital mortality, to analyze the outcomes after ECMO weaning including survival at day 28 and day 90, and to analyze the utility of a circulatory support mobile unit in a severe pandemic Inclusions are both prospective and retrospective in order to collect data over the whole pandemic

Origin and Function of Eosinophilic Polynuclear During DRESS Syndrome

Prospective Non-interventional Study of Adult Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

During the last fifteen years, the landscape of AML diagnosis and therapeutical options has markedly evolved. Refined genetic and prognostic characterizations, together with new drug approvals and new allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) procedures, have increased patient journey diversity. I - At initial AML diagnosis, not all newly diagnosed patients are entering clinical trials. A substantial proportion of them are treated with standard therapies outside of any trial. To date, the standard approved frontline treatment options include: 1. Standard intensive 3+7 (anthracycline + cytarabine) chemotherapy ± an approved FLT3 inhibitor (midostaurine, Rydapt®), according to different dose schedules in older versus younger patients 2. Combination of sequential gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO, Mylotarg®) with 3+7 3. Liposomal formulation of daunorubicin + cytarabine (CPX-351, Vyxeos®) 4. Less intensive chemotherapy with azacytidine or low dose cytarabine (LDAC) in patients considered as not eligible for the more intensive options above The investigator's choice is guided by AML and patient's characteristics, and by the approved indications for each of these treatment options. This study will thus start including these specific options. Further study amendments might be necessary in case of new standard treatment definition. II - Secondly, no specific salvage regimen has emerged as a standard in patients with primary refractory or relapsed AML (R/R AML). R/R AML is thus an important field for investigational new drugs (INDs) and precision medicine development. To date, the only IND approved to treat R/R AML is gilteritinib for FLT3-mutated AML patients. The French agency ANSM also allow to use GO for treating R/R AML patients in the frame of a RTU (Recommendation Temporaire d'Utilisation). In the "real life", because of the multiplicity of treatments used in these patients, some of them being now quite efficient, it has become difficult to accurately describe the general outcome of R/R AML patients. III - Thirdly, allogeneic HSCT is no more considered at the ultimate and final goal of AML therapy in all patients, as it was in the past. Transplant indications have been better described and HSCT in now evaluated in the context of the whole treatment course, including pre- and post-transplant therapy, as well as pre- and post-transplant minimal residual disease (MRD) levels. For all these reasons, it is of utmost importance to document the various characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients treated in the real-life, outside of clinical trials, for 1) real-world treatment evaluation; 2) post-approval use of recently approved drugs; 3) standardization and improvement of routine patient management; and 4) better disease understanding.