All The Regions of The Country, France
A Global Phase III Study of Rilvegostomig or Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for First-Line Treatment of PD-L1-high Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
This is a Phase III, two-arm, randomized, double-blind, global, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab as a 1L treatment for patients with mNSCLC whose tumors express PD-L1.
Phase
3Span
295 weeksSponsor
AstraZenecaDijon
Recruiting
Choice of Anticoagulant for Primary Hemostasis Studies with PFA200® (Platelet Function Analyser)
Phase
N/ASpan
32 weeksSponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonDijon
Recruiting
Antimicrobial Therapy for Difficult-to-treat Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
Infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with acquired resistances to all first-line antipseudomonal beta-lactams and fluoroquinolones (difficult-to-treat isolates - DTR), pose serious therapeutical challenges, especially in critically ill and/or immunocompromised patients. Certain new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BL/BLI (beta lactamine/ beta lactamase inhibitor) - i.e., ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, others) and cefiderocol have shown promising results for the treatment of infections due to DTR P. aeruginosa. However, multicenter data on their real-life utilization in this indication are still scarce. The ADDICT study is a prospective, multicenter cohort study including unselected patients with DTR P. aeruginosa infection requiring definite intravenous antimicrobial therapy. The primary objective of the study is to investigate the clinical efficacy of available options (new BL/BLI, cefiderocol or older agents such as aminoglycosides and colistin) in this population. Secondary objectives are to compare the clinical and microbiological efficacy of available options in infections due to DTR P. aeruginosa with in vitro susceptibility to more than one last-resort drug, to compare the incidence of non-ecological adverse events observed with these drugs, to assess the incidence of resistance emergence under therapy and to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of resistance emergence, to assess the benefits and risks of combination therapy in this indication, to compare the acquisition rates of multidrug-resistant bacteria other than DTR P. aeruginosa, and Clostridioides difficile infection, to compare Day-28 and in-hospital all-cause mortality rates. Patients will be recruited in 60 hospital centers contributing to four French networks of research in infectious diseases and critical care (CRICS-TRIGGERSEP, ReaRezo, OutcomeRéa, RENARCI - PROMISE metanetwork). Clinical variables will be collected through an electronic case-report form. DTR P. aeruginosa isolates will be sent to the National Reference Center of Antimicrobial Resistance in P. aeruginosa for centralized analyses (extended antimicrobial susceptibility testing, MLST, whole-genome sequencing of successive isolates if resistance emergence under therapy).
Phase
N/ASpan
99 weeksSponsor
Centre Hospitalier Régional d'OrléansDijon
Recruiting
Comparison of Speech Understanding Between Tonotopy-based Fitting and Setting Based on Evolutionary Algorithms
Introduction: Cochlear implantation allows the rehabilitation of profound bilateral deafness, restoring speech perception and verbal communication when the traditional hearing aid no longer provides satisfactory hearing gain. A cochlear implant includes an electrode array and its functioning is based on the principle of cochlear tonotopy: each electrode encodes a frequency spectrum according to its position in the cochlea (high frequencies are assigned to the basal electrodes and low frequencies to the apical electrodes). The cochlear implant thus breaks down the frequency spectrum into a number of frequency bands via bandpass filters corresponding to the number of electrodes in the implant. During the fitting these bands can be modified by the audiologist. The fitting software developed by the manufacturers proposed a default fitting with a lower limit between 100 and 250 Hz according to the brands and an upper limit of about 8500 Hz. The frequency bands assigned to each electrode follow a logarithmic scale with the high frequencies for the basal electrodes and the low frequencies for the apical electrodes. This distribution takes into account the number of active electrodes but does not take into account the anatomy and the natural cochlear tonotopy specific to each patient. Several studies have analyzed the anatomical variations of the cochlear dimensions: size of the cochlea and the ratio between the contact surfaces of the electrodes with the cochlea are variable from one patient to another. The insertion depth during surgery is also variable due to parameters related to the patients as well as to the operator, which seems to impact the understanding of speech in noise. Mathematical algorithms have recently been developed to estimate the cochlear tonotopy of each patient from a CT scan assessment. CT imaging of the implanted ear combined with 3D reconstruction software, provides cochlear length measurements Using this approach it is possible to measure the position of each electrode relative to the cochlear apex. Recently, MED-EL (Austria) has developed a new approach based on CT-scan and tuning of the frequencies associated with each electrode using anatomical information of position of the electrodes in the cochlea: this fitting is called anatomy-based fitting. A tonotopy-based fitting allows for better results in pitch perception or speech perception in noise or musical perception. However, there is a large variability in the results observed between patients. This variability could be due to the individual characteristics of the listeners (neuronal survival, current propagation and spread, duration of deafness, lack of cortical plasticity). A modification of frequency allocations in the setting could take into account this individual variability and improve speech discrimination and music perception. Saadoun et al. (2022) studied on 27 subjects the effect of an adjustment of frequency allocation by an evolutionary algorithm (EA) approach and showed an improvement in speech perception in noise compared to a default setting (not based on tonotopy) for patients implanted for more than 6 months in a bimodal situation (with a contralateral prosthesis). We therefore propose to use evolutionary algorithms to modify the tonotopy-based fitting and improve the perception in noise of implanted patients. Main objective: Compare speech recognition in noise with tonotopic setting (FS4T) and tonotopic fitting modified by evolutionary algorithm (EAFS4T) in adult patients implanted for 6 months or more with a MED-EL cochlear implant with FS4T. Secondary objectives: Comparison of FS4T and EAFS4T settings - for speech recognition in quiet - for subjective auditory spatial perception - for subjective auditory and musical perception Plan of the study: It is a prospective open monocentric transversal study.
Phase
N/ASpan
157 weeksSponsor
MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GesmbHDijon
Recruiting
POlycythemia, Proteins and ErYthropoiesis
Phase
N/ASpan
213 weeksSponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonDijon
Recruiting
A Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility and Acceptability of Newborn Screening Using in Silico Panel-based Solo Genome Sequencing in France
Phase
N/ASpan
326 weeksSponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonDijon
Recruiting
Study Comparing Safety and Immunogenicity of Intranasal COVID-19 Vaccine and mRNA Booster in Healthy Adults
This is a randomized, comparative, multicenter, open-label, phase I/II trial in France evaluating the safety and immunogenicity of a booster dose of an intranasal COVID-19 vaccine (LVt-001) versus a booster dose of a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) in healthy adult volunteers. Phase I dose escalating - Primary Objective: To evaluate the safety of three escalating doses of a boost of an intranasal COVID-19 vaccine (LVT-001) expressing SARS-CoV-2 N/S recombinant protein in healthy volunteers. Phase II superiority trial - Primary Objective: To evaluate, using nasal swabs, the superiority of a booster dose of the selected intranasal COVID-19 vaccine (LVT-001) expressing SARS-COV-2 N/S recombinant protein versus a booster dose of the intramuscular COVID-19 mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) in healthy adult volunteers in term of mucosal humoral immune response at Day 28. Trial population: A total of 36 and 202 healthy volunteers will be enrolled in Phase I and Phase II, respectively. Interventions: Phase I: The investigational medicinal product is the intranasal recombinant protein vaccine LVT-001 administered at Day 0 in each nostril: - Cohort A (12 participants): 20 µg - Cohort B (12 participants): 60 µg - Cohort C (12 participants): 120 µg Phase II: Two investigational medicinal products will be compared: - The selected dose of the intranasal recombinant protein vaccine LVT-001, administered at Day 0 in each nostril. - The intramuscular COVID-19 mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech), administered as the standard of care booster. Expected Outcomes and Safety Considerations: In Phase I, healthy participants are not expected to benefit directly from the trial aside from the potential theoretical benefit of a mucosal immune response against SARS-CoV-2. Currently, no clinical trial data exist for a nasal protein vaccine in humans. The anticipated risks primarily include local nasal reactions and systemic reactions similar to those observed with other vaccines. Any adverse events following vaccination are expected to be manageable with routine care, as determined by investigators. Given that this is the first human trial of a nasal protein vaccine, the dose-escalation design ensures a safety margin, allowing for careful monitoring before progressing to the next cohort.
Phase
1/2Span
153 weeksSponsor
ANRS, Emerging Infectious DiseasesDijon
Recruiting
Healthy Volunteers
A Phase Ⅲ Study of Rilvegostomig in Combination With Fluoropyrimidine and Trastuzumab Deruxtecan as the First-line Treatment for HER2-positive Gastric Cancer
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig in combination with fluoropyrimidine and T-DXd (Arm A) compared to trastuzumab, chemotherapy, and pembrolizumab (Arm B) in HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma participants whose tumors express PD L1 CPS ≥ 1. Rilvegostomig in combination with trastuzumab and chemotherapy will be evaluated in a separate arm (Arm C) to assess the contribution of each component in the experimental arm. This study will be conducted at up to 200-250 sites globally in approximately 25 countries.
Phase
3Span
298 weeksSponsor
AstraZenecaDijon
Recruiting
Implementation of a Tumor Response Assessment Program Integrating the Shared Medical Decision Into the Organ Preservation Strategy for Rectal Cancer Patients
Phase
N/ASpan
329 weeksSponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonDijon
Recruiting
PRODIGE 90 - (FFCD 2204) Neoadjuvant Dostarlimab with Short Course Radiotherapy in a Watch-and-wait Strategy for Microsatellite Unstable or Mismatch Repair-deficient Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients
Phase
3Span
295 weeksSponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonDijon
Recruiting