Al Shorouk City, Egypt

Implementation of Home Monitoring in Patients with Pulmonary Fibrosis

Patients will be randomly assigned to receive either hospital-based care or a home monitoring program integrated into hospital-based care. Hospital-based care involves outpatient clinic visits every three months including lung function testing. Home monitoring involves weekly measurements of both physiological- and patient reported outcomes (PROs) in a mobile health care application with half of the outpatient clinic visits alternately being replaced by remote video consultations. The home monitoring program includes home spirometry, pulse-oximetry, PROs, video consultations, a medication coach, and an infotheque showing disease-specific information. Questionnaires will be filled out by both study groups at set time points. The total study duration for individual patients will be 12 months.

The Dragon PLC Trial (DRAGON-PLC)

Primary liver cancer (PLC) is the third most common cause of cancer death worldwide. Surgical resection is the mainstay for a curative approach as contemporary chemotherapy and immune-based therapies only lead to a median survival of 10-14 months. A complete surgical resection increases the median survival to 42 months (range 32-52 months). However, PLC is mainly diagnosed at an advanced stage and >70% of PLC patients are ineligible for an immediate surgical approach. There are different reasons that make a patient ineligible for surgery, one important reason is the risk of liver failure after the surgery due to a small remnant liver. This study aims to improve the oncological, radiological and surgical strategy to allow more patients to undergo liver resection safely, to improve quality of life and to extend overall survival at acceptable costs. Adequate function of the future liver remnant (FLR) is a prerequisite for surgical resectability. This is necessary in order to avoid liver failure after surgery, a major cause of morbidity (38%) and mortality (27%). To mitigate this risk, regenerative strategies based on preoperative calculation of the FLR volume and function are essential. Patients with technically resectable disease but predicted insufficient FLR volume or function are referred to as primarily unresectable or potentially resectable (PU/PR). These patients can undergo strategies that capitalize on the regenerative capacity of the liver which aim to preoperatively increase the FLR volume and function in order to allow surgery. Many of the patients that are primarily unresectable due to an insufficient FLR can become ultimately and safely resectable after the induction of adequate FLR-hypertrophy by the current standard, portal vein embolisation (PVE). However, 25% of patients do not show sufficient FLR growth after PVE and are unable to safely undergo resection. A new approach has been developed to improve this. Combined portal and hepatic vein embolisation (PVE/HVE) has great promise in terms of increasing FLR growth, resection rate (RR), safety and potentially, overall survival. Establishing PVE/HVE as the new standard could result in increased survival and a better quality of life (QoL) for patients.

Treatment of ELectroencephalographic STatus Epilepticus After Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation-2 (TELSTAR-2)

Rationale: Around 7500 comatose patients after cardiac arrest and resuscitation are admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) in the Netherlands and Belgium, yearly. Approximately half eventually dies from severe brain injury. EEG is used as a predictor of outcome, helping decide whether life sustaining therapies should be pursued or withdrawn. EEG shows epileptiform patterns meeting criteria for electrographic status epilepticus (ESE) in up to 10% of patients, with 80-100% case fatality. With the TELSTAR-1 trial, we showed that anti-seizure treatment of unselected patients with epileptiform patterns is not associated with a better outcome. However, it remains unclear whether treatment of (possible) ESE will improve outcome, or if ESE simply represents irreversible severe brain damage, in which case such treatment will be futile. This translates into ongoing practice variation. To provide comatose cardiac arrest survivors with the best medical treatment options, while at the same time preventing unnecessary costly ICU treatment, unequivocal evidence of efficacy or futility of ESE treatment is needed. Objectives: It is the primary objective to study whether ESE treatment improves outcome of comatose patients after cardiac arrest. It is the secondary objective to study the impact on healthcare costs of ESE treatment. Main trial endpoints: The primary outcome measure will be functional recovery expressed as the score on the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (eGOS) at six months after cardiac arrest. The primary effect parameter will be the common odds ratio for any shift towards a better outcome in the intervention group, analyzed by multivariable ordinal logistic regression. Secondary trial endpoints: Secondary outcome measures include data on quality of life, cognitive functioning, and the use of resources. Cost-effectiveness will be assessed, separately for Belgium and for the Netherlands, adhering to 'KCE' and 'Zorginstituut' guidelines for pharmaco-economic evaluations, respectively. Trial design: This will be a comparative effectiveness study, comparing two standard treatment regimens. We will conduct a prospective multicentre trial with randomized treatment allocation, open label treatment, and blinded endpoint assessment on twenty intensive care units in the Netherlands and Belgium. Trial population: The study population consists of adult comatose patients after out of hospital cardiac arrest and successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation, admitted on the intensive care unit of any of the participating centres, with ESE on continuous EEG. Continuous EEG is part of standard care in all participating hospitals. For the definition of ESE, we adhere to international consensus criteria. Interventions: Treatment in the intervention group will consist of standard care completed with anti-seizure treatment according to protocols for clinically overt status epilepticus with the goal of definitive seizure suppression. This consists of a stepwise approach, step 1 being a single dose of a parenteral benzodiazepine (lorazepam, midazolam, or diazepam) and a first parenteral anti-seizure medication (levetiracetam, valproate, or lacosamide), step 2, a second parenteral anti-seizure medication plus a first continuous parenteral sedative agent (midazolam or propofol), and step 3, a second continuous parenteral sedative agent (midazolam, propofol, or ketamine). Each next step will be taken as soon as possible (within 30 minutes) if the previous step was insufficiently effective to suppress ESE. The control group will receive standard care without anti-seizure treatment.

Statins in Frail Older Patients with Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack - the Prospective Cohort Study

The stroke incidence strongly increases with age.Many of the older individuals that suffered a stroke will have to live with stroke sequelae and will need lifelong care, either at home or in a nursing facility. Hence, secondary prevention strategies are of the highest importance. Statins are used for the prevention of subsequent cardiovascular events in ischemic stroke and TIA patients. The efficacy of statin therapy has been firmly established in middle-aged stroke patients. However, despite the high prevalence of stroke in older people, the evidence for the efficacy of statin therapy in older individuals that suffered an ischemic stroke or TIA is sparse. This primarily arises from the underrepresentation of older patients in statin trials. In a recent meta-analysis, it was found that in people aged 70 and above, statin use lowered the annual incidence of major vascular events with approximately one percent. However, the trials in this meta-analysis mostly included fit, non-frail older adults. Frailty is a geriatric condition characterized by an increased vulnerability to external stressors, linked to adverse outcomes, including premature mortality. A considerable proportion of the older population is frail. However, since trials that include older individuals often focus on fit, non-frail older adults, there is currently no evidence for the most effective treatment strategy in the frail older group. While it might be tempting to extrapolate the benefits of statin therapy from younger patients to frail older patients, it is vital to acknowledge the considerable disparities between these groups. Firstly, frail older stroke survivors may not have a life-expectancy longer than the time to benefit. Secondly, due to the high percentage of polypharmacy in frail older people, this patient group has a higher risk for the occurrence of drug-drug interactions and adverse effects, which have the ability to significantly affect the quality of life. The limited body of evidence regarding the effectiveness of statins in the older population, combined with their higher susceptibility to side effects and drug interactions, results in uncertainty for patients as well as for doctors and policymakers when deciding how to treat this patient group.This uncertainty is clearly reflected in the two Dutch guidelines ("Herseninfarct en Hersenbloeding" and "Cardiovascular Risk Management (CVRM)" respectively), providing conflicting advice on optimal statin treatment in older patients. The investigators hypothesize that in frail older patients with a recent ischemic stroke or TIA, discontinuing statins will increase health-related quality of life (HrQoL) without a substantial decrease in Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) free survival, which includes cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or nonfatal stroke. In this prospective cohort study, no intervention will be implemented. Participants will be followed for two years (and for the patients included in the first years of the inclusion period - three). During this time, data is collected including questionnaires on quality of life, occurrence of MACE or falls, and possible changes in statin treatment.

Revumenib in Combination With Azacitidine + Venetoclax in Patients NPM1-mutated or KMT2A-rearranged AML

The Effect of exeRcise And Diet on Quality of Life in Patients With Incurable Cancer of Esophagus and Stomach (RADICES)

Randomization will be stratified based on: duration of first line therapy (shorter or longer than 6 months), WHO performance status (0, 1 versus 2), (intended) start of second-line (or further) systemic therapy for progressive disease (yes versus no) and time since failure of first line therapy (shorter or longer than 3 months ago). Due to the nature of the intervention, it is not possible to blind the patients, the local study nurses, or the investigators to the treatment assignment.

OPTImaL:Optimisation of Treatment for Patients With Low Stage Triple-negative Breast Cancer With High Stromal Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes

Pain in Endometriosis And the Relation to Lifestyle

Seeing the Light: Early Intervention in People at Risk for Bipolar Disorder

Severe mental illnesses (SMI) distinguished as bipolar disorder and psychotic spectrum disorders, substantially impair patients' engagement in functional and occupational activities and severely limit social and societal functioning (GGZ Standaarden, 2022; NIH, 2022; NIMH, 2018). Based on the Dutch definition of SMI 1.7% of the national population suffers from an SMI (GGZ Standaarden, 2022). Despite this, time between first symptoms and accurate SMI diagnosis, can add up to more than 9.5 years in the case of bipolar disorders. For the psychotic spectrum, an early detection and intervention program (UHR) carried out by special EDI-Teams already exists, and has been found effective in limiting the transition to SMI with fifty percent. For bipolar disorders, no such program exists. This raises the question whether prodromal and subclinical symptoms of this disorder can be detected earlier and if transition into SMI can be limited. In light of current studies into the at-risk mental state, and the current development towards a possible transdiagnostic model for early detection and intervention of SMI (CHARMS-categories; (Liu et al., 2022)), the current study aims to contribute to limiting the transition into bipolar disorder. As a disturbance in circadian rhythm, as well as mood and anxiety symptoms are risk indicators for SMI in general and bipolar in specific, the current study evaluates an early intervention program for individuals at risk for developing an SMI, with a focus on bipolar symptomatology. Individuals at risk will answer questions from the SIBARS interview. As explained in a publication of Fusar-Poli et al. (2022), "The Semi-structured Interview for Bipolar At Risk States (SIBARS) included a combination of several items adapted from well-established rating scales: (CAARMS (Yung et al., 2005); Hypomania Checklist-32 (Angst et al., 2005); Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale (Altman et al., 1997); TEMPS-A questionnaire (Akiskal et al., 2005); QIDS-SR (Rush et al., 2003); Bergen Insomnia Scale (Pallesen et al., 2008); Idiopathic hypersomnia questionnaire (Vernet et al., 2010)). The SIBARS interview was developed for youths aged 15-35 and comprehended 5 domains: 1. Subtreshold Mania, 2. Depression, 3. Cyclothymic Features, 4. Genetic Risk, 5. Mood Swings. Subtreshold Mania, Depression and Mood Swings are continuous rating scales (that include a severity and frequency anchors), while Cyclothyimc Features and Genetic Risk are categorical scales (yes/no). The cut-offs allow assigning the specific subgroup of the BARS criteria: 1. Substreshold Mania, 2. Depression+Cyclothymic Features, 3. Depression+Genetic Risk, 4. Cyclothymic Features+Genetic Risk, 5.Subtreshold Mixed Episode, 6. Mood Swings."

DOSAGE Study: Upfront Dose-Reduced Chemotherapy in Older Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Treating older adults with chemotherapy remains a challenge, as they are strongly underrepresented in clinical trials and no robust guidelines for treating older patients exist. Moreover, older adults are at increased risk of chemotherapy-related toxicity, resulting in decreased quality of life (QoL), increased hospital admissions and high health care costs. Therefore, the aim of the DOSAGE study is to demonstrate that upfront dose-reduced chemotherapy in patients with metastasized colorectal cancer is non-inferior to full-dose treatment with regard to progression-free survival (PFS). Treatment plans (monotherapy or doublet chemotherapy) will be based on expected risk of treatment toxicity for the individual patient (according to the Geriatric 8 (G8) questionnaire). The investigators expect that this treatment strategy will lead to less grade ≥3 toxicity, less early treatment continuation and hospitalizations and a better QoL and physical functioning. The DOSAGE study is a phase III, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized controlled clinical trial in patients aged ≥70 years with metastasized colorectal cancer eligible for palliative chemotherapy. All participating patients will undergo geriatric screening by the G8 questionnaire and will be classified as "low risk of toxicity" (G8-score of 15 or higher) or "high risk of toxicity" (G8-score of 14 or lower or judged as "high toxicity risk" by their treating oncologist). Patients classified as low risk will be randomized between a fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin in either full-dose, or with an upfront dose-reduction of 25%. Patients classified as high risk will be randomized between fluoropyrimidine monotherapy in either full-dose or upfront dose-reduction. Addition of targeted treatment (bevacizumab or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition) is allowed. Patients with a moderate renal impairment (GFR 30- 50 mL/min) will be treated with 25% reduced starting dose of capecitabine when randomized for full dose treatment and treated with 40% reduced starting dose when randomized for upfront dose reduction. Primary outcome is PFS. Secondary endpoints include grade ≥3 toxicity, QoL, physical functioning, overall survival, number of treatment cycles, dose reductions, hospital admissions, cumulative received dosage and cost-effectiveness. Given a non-inferiority margin of 8 weeks, 587 patients will be included (293/292 patients per arm).