Dk-2730, Herlev, Denmark

A Study of BMS-986504 in Participants With Pre-treated Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) With Homozygous MTAP Deletion

Hypothermia Versus Normothermia After Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest

Temperature control is a key neurointensive care for post-cardiac arrest patients. Although therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to be effective in the past, recent large randomized controlled trials have failed to demonstrate its efficacy. The international guidelines recommend temperature control under 37.7°C. However, the optimal temperature control, i.e., hypothermia versus normothermia, remains controversial. Additionally, randomized controlled trials that examined temperature control after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) are lacking. ECPR is a resuscitation technique using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for refractory cardiac arrest. In ECPR patients, ECMO using a heat exchanger can more rapidly achieve the targeted temperature as compared to other temperature control devices. Early cooling to achieve hypothermia after resuscitation is expected to be more effective for neuroprotection in the injured brain. Thus, the investigators hypothesized that hypothermia would be effective in ECPR patients. Furthermore, ECMO can stabilize the respiratory and circulatory status. Therefore, hypothermia, which may have side effects such as electrolyte abnormalities and arrhythmias, may be safely performed by ECMO. However, ECMO requires the administration of anticoagulants; therefore, it has the risk of hemorrhagic complications. Among patients receiving ECPR, bleeding is a common complication due to its relatively difficult procedure, considering the fact that emergent cannulation is performed under resuscitation. Additionally, CPR-related complications can also result in bleeding. These complications may be enhanced by hypothermia. Therefore, hypothermia after ECPR could contribute to a favorable outcome, but it could also cause bleeding. The SAVE-J NEUROTHERM trial is a cluster randomized trial that evaluated and compared the mortality risk, neurological outcomes, and adverse events between out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients who underwent hypothermia and normothermia after ECPR.

Multi-omics Study in Citrin Deficiency

Citrin deficiency (CD) is an inherited autosomal recessive metabolic condition that is also a secondary urea cycle disorder caused by mutations in the SLC25A13 gene, which encodes for the mitochondrial transporter, citrin. Citrin is a key component of the mitochondrial malate-aspartate shuttle (MAS) and is responsible for moving Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide (NADH) from the cytosol into the mitochondria via reducing equivalents such as malate, which drives mitochondrial respiration to produce energy in the form of adenosine triphosphate (ATP). The MAS is also critical in regulating Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide (NAD+/NADH) redox balance to maintain cytosolic redox-dependent metabolic pathways such as glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, amino acid metabolism, and lipid metabolism. Citrin is also required to supply cytosolic aspartate, which is the substrate of one of the urea cycle enzymes, namely argininosuccinate synthetase 1, and thus important for the proper functioning of the urea cycle. The clinical presentations of citrin deficiency often vary widely between patients but can generally be distinguished by distinct clinical phenotypes, which are neonatal intrahepatic cholestasis caused by citrin deficiency (NICCD) that affects infants, the "failure to thrive and dyslipidemia" form of CD (FTTDCD) in childhood, the adaptation or silent period, and citrullinemia type II (CTLN2), which represents the most severe form of the condition. While only a small percentage of CD patients develop CTLN2, the prognosis for these patients is typically poor. It is notable that all CD patients above 1 year old (post-NICCD) naturally develop a characteristic food preference that favors a diet rich in protein and fat while being low in carbohydrates. Other clinical findings observed in some CD patients include fatty liver, fatigue, hypoglycemia, and failure to thrive. There is currently no effective cure for CD. Before the onset of CTLN2, patients are primarily managed by diet control with a low carbohydrate, high protein and high-fat diet, as well as medium chain triglyceride (MCT) supplementation. CTLN2 patients have been treated with sodium pyruvate, arginine, and MCT with limited success, with severe cases requiring liver transplantation as the only solution. There are currently no specific biomarkers that effectively track the disease progression, making it challenging to monitor how well patients are actually doing or to measure the effectiveness of therapies. Without proper management or timely medical interventions, patients may develop CTLN2. Given the urgent and unmet need for biomarkers specific to CD, the main goal of this study is to uncover disease-specific biomarkers by analyzing blood samples collected from CD patients using both targeted and untargeted metabolomics, proteomics, lipidomics, and transcriptomics. Targeted omics will involve the analysis of cellular pathways associated with the condition, such as the MAS pathway, glycolysis, protein metabolism, de novo lipogenesis, lipolysis, gluconeogenesis, NAD+ metabolism, ureagenesis, and the glutamine synthetase pathway. Identification of such biomarkers will allow a deeper understanding of the disease pathogenesis. Importantly, these biomarkers may enable better tracking of disease progression and may help to prevent the onset of CTLN2. Finally, these biomarkers will also greatly benefit the development of effective therapeutic options for CD in clinical trials by serving as measurable endpoints. Obtaining the necessary material from patients consists of a minimally invasive venous blood sampling taken during a regular outpatient visit and after the informed consent of the patients or caretakers.

A Study to Evaluate Zilovertamab Vedotin (MK-2140) Combination With Rituximab Plus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Prednisone (R-CHP) Versus Rituximab Plus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CHOP) in Participants With Previously Untreated DLBCL (MK-2140-010)

A Study of Avutometinib + Defactinib in Recurrent Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer in Japanese Patients

This is a multi-center, open label Phase 2 study designed to evaluate safety and tolerability and confirm efficacy by BICR of avutometinib in combination with defactinib in Japanese patients with molecularly profiled recurrent LGSOC.

A Trial of Lu AF82422 in Participants With Multiple System Atrophy (MSA)

This study will consist of a 3-6-week screening period, a 72-week placebo-controlled period (PCP), and will include a 72-week optional dose-blinded open-label treatment extension (OLE) period. Participants in the PCP will be randomized to Lu AF82422 high dose, Lu AF82422 low dose or placebo (1:1:1). All participants entering the OLE will receive Lu AF82422 during the OLE. Participants will receive intravenous infusions approximately every 4 weeks during both the PCP and OLE.

A Study to Learn More About How Well BAY 2927088 Works and How Safe it is Compared With Standard Treatment, in Participants Who Have Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) With Mutations in the Genes of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)

Avacopan vs Reduced-dose Glucocorticoids in ANCA-associated Vasculitis

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis is characterized by a small to medium-size vasculitis and the presence of ANCA. ANCA-associated vasculitis includes microscopic polyangiitis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. ANCA-associated vasculitis can be a life-threatening disease and the mortality is 80% at 1 year in untreated patients. In 2010s, standard therapies for remission induction of ANCA-associated vasculitis were the combination of high-dose glucocorticoids and either cyclophosphamide or rituximab. Although those therapies have high remission rates of 80-90%, mortality at 5 years is still high at 10-20% mainly due to treatments-related adverse events. In the LoVAS trial (2021, JAMA), the combination of reduced-dose glucocorticoid and rituximab showed non-inferiority to high-dose glucocorticoid and rituximab in remission rates at 6 months. In addition, adverse events were dramatically less in the reduced-dose group than in the high-dose group. In the ADVOCATE trial (2021, NEJM), the combination of avacopan, newly developed complement C5a inhibitor, and rituximab or cyclophosphamide showed non-inferiority to high-dose glucocorticoid and rituximab or cyclophosphamide in remission rates at 6 months. The avacopan group was allowed to use glucocorticoid within 1 month from the trial entry, and over 80% of patients used glucocorticoid indeed. Regarding adverse events, they were less in the avacopan group than in the glucocorticoid group. Although both the reduced-dose glucocorticoid regimen in the LoVAS trial and the avacopan regimen in the ADVOCATE trial are effective and safe for patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis, there is no trial directly comparing both regimens at the moment. Thus, in this multicenter, open-label, randomized, non-ineriority, phase 4 trial, the investigators aim to investigate if the combination of avacoapn, short-term (4 weeks) reduced-dose glucocorticoid and rituximab is non-inferior to the combination of reduced-dose glucocorticoid (20 weeks) and rituximab. The investigators also compare safety profiles and disease relapse between the two groups. A total of 160 patients with new-onset ANCA-associated vasculitis (microscopic polyangiitis and granulomatosis with polyangiitis) will be recruited and randomized to the two treatments groups. The primary end point is remission rate at 26 weeks, and the patients will be followed until 104 weeks for assessing disease relapse and long-term safety.

Utility of Adjusting Chemotherapy Dose & Dosing Schedule with the SALVage Weekly Dose-dense Regimen in Patients with Poor Prognostic OVARian Cancers Based on the Tumor Unfavorable Primary Chemosensitivity and Incomplete Debulking Surgery

SALVOVAR is a pragmatic open-label multicenter randomized phase III trial (ratio 1:1) comparing the efficacy of the salvage weekly dose-dense regimen with those of the continuation of the same standard regimen as given during neo-adjuvant period. The randomization will be stratified on the main clinical prognostic factors assumed to impact the efficacy of the assessed arms and the overall survival: 1. Bevacizumab: planned administration: Yes, vs No 2. BRCA mutation: planned administration: Yes, vs No/Unknown 3. KELIMTM strate within unfavorable KELIM subgroup: very unfavorable < 0.7, vs moderately unfavorable [0.7-1.0[ The trial will be pragmatic, as it aims at confirming the superiority of the adjusted chemotherapy compared to the continuation of the standard chemotherapy in routine clinical practice, in a population of ovarian cancer patients close to the real-life clinical activity with few selection criteria.

Open-label Extension Study of Enlicitide Decanoate (MK-0616/Enlicitide Oral PCSK9 Inhibitor) in Adults With Hypercholesterolemia (MK-0616-019) CORALreef Extension