Calle 9 No. 24-37 - Yopal, Casanare, Colombia

Phase 2 Study Evaluating Rapcabtagene Autoleucel in Participants With Severe Active GPA or MPA

This is a Phase 2, randomized, assessor-blinded active controlled study. This study comprises two cohorts: - A lead-in cohort enrolling participants to receive rapcabtagene autoleucel - A randomized cohort with participants receiving either rapcabtagene autoleucel or comparator. After end of study (EOS), participants who received rapcabtagene autoleucel infusion will enter a long-term follow-up (LTFU) period lasting up to 15 years after rapcabtagene autoleucel infusion. This LTFU will be described in a separate study protocol.

A Study to Learn About Study Medicine ALTA2618 in Adults With AKT1 E17K-Mutant Solid Tumors

This is an open-label, multicenter, Phase 1/1b study of ALTA2618, a mutant-selective and orally bioavailable AKT1 E17K inhibitor, in adults with AKT1 E17K-mutant solid tumors. This study will evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary clinical activity of ALTA2618, and aims to find the best dose. The study consists of two parts: Part 1 - Dose Escalation and Part 1b - Dose Expansion.

A Study to Investigate Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of AZD5492 in Adult Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus or Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies.

This is an open-label, multi-centre Phase I study to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of AZD5492 in adult participants with either SLE or IIM. Participants will be enrolled in approximately 20 sites in 8 countries. The study consists of 2 parts: Part 1 - Single ascending dose (SAD) Part 1 will be a sequential SAD design in adult participants with SLE. Up to 5 dose levels of AZD5492 are planned to be investigated. Depending on emerging data, up to 4 additional dose levels may be added at the discretion of the Sponsor. The decision to open Part 2 will be made by the Safety Review Committee (SRC) based on the evaluation of all available data including safety, tolerability, PK, and PD from Part 1, and the dose levels and dosing strategy for Part 2 will be confirmed. After a screening period of up to 42 days, participants will receive 1 dose of AZD5492 and be followed up for at least 179 days post-dose. Part 2 - Step-up dosing (SUD) Part 2 will be a SUD design in adult participants with SLE, who previously did not participate in Part 1, and in adult participants with IIM. In Part 2, participants will receive 2 dose administrations, where the second dose will be administered 7 days after the first dose. The first (priming) dose of the step-up regimen will be agreed by the SRC. The second (target) dose will be escalated, and a minimum of 3 target dose levels are planned to be investigated in Part 2.

Optimal PERioperative Antiplatelet Therapy Investigation ON Abdominal Surgery After Coronary Stent Implantation

PCI with coronary stent implantation is performed for a huge number of patients with coronary artery disease. Approximately 20% of these patients undergo non-cardiac surgery within three years after PCI. However, there is a scarcity of clinical evidence regarding the efficacy of perioperative aspirin continuation on cardiovascular events.

A Study to Evaluate Zilovertamab Vedotin (MK-2140) Combination With Rituximab Plus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Prednisone (R-CHP) Versus Rituximab Plus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CHOP) in Participants With Previously Untreated DLBCL (MK-2140-010)

Pembrolizumab Plus Lenvatinib in Unresectable Cutaneous Angiosarcoma Patients

This is a multi-center, single-arm, investigator-initiated phase II clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib therapy in patients with unresectable cutaneous angiosarcoma (WHO Classification of Skin Tumors 4th edition). In Japan, the first-line treatment for cutaneous angiosarcoma is surgical resection with radiotherapy for patients with limited and completely resectable lesions and chemotherapy alone or with radiotherapy for patients with unresectable lesions. Paclitaxel is widely used for chemotherapy based on the ANGIOTAX trial. However, the prognosis of Japanese patients with cutaneous angiosarcoma is still poor, with a mean survival time of 19.52 months and a 5-year survival of 9%. The development of a new therapeutic regimen is an urgent task to improve the prognosis of such patients; however, company-sponsored clinical trials for this disease are not actively conducted since cutaneous angiosarcoma is a rare cancer. For the above reasons, conducting this study as an investigator-initiated clinical trial is important. The clinical hypothesis of this study is "the efficacy of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib combination therapy exceeds ANGIOTAX trial in the primary endpoint of response rate, and the efficacy and safety present expecting results in the secondary endpoints." According to an epidemiological survey of skin cancer based on the National Cancer Registry, the total number of cutaneous angiosarcoma registered in 2016 and 2017 was 993, with an average annual registration of 497 cases. Cutaneous angiosarcoma is a very rare cancer, and it is impossible to secure enough participants to conduct a randomized controlled clinical trial. Therefore, this study is designed as a single-arm study. The result of a phase II study (Alliance A091902) of cabozantinib + nivolumab for advanced angiosarcoma previously treated with a taxane-based regimen was reported at ASCO 2023, and the overall response rate for cutaneous angiosarcoma (N=13) was 54% among the 22 cases registered to the trial. It is expected that a high response rate will also be obtained in this study regarding a similar regimen. Since this is a single-arm study for rare cancer, eligible patients who give consent are expected to be enrolled almost comprehensively, so selection bias is unlikely to occur. The primary endpoint of this study is the response rate, a common endpoint in phase II trials. Since the response rate in the ANGIOTAX trial was 18%, the threshold response rate for this trial will be set at 18%, the expected response rate at 35%, the significance level at 0.05, and the statistical power at 0.70. According to this study's threshold response rate, expected response rate, significance level, and statistical power, the number of participants required for analysis will be 35. The planned number of participants to be enrolled was set at 38, anticipating some dropouts. In the ANGIOTAX trial, 11 participants among the 30 enrolled were previously treated with chemotherapy, and 19 were untreated. To ensure comparability with the trial, the maximum number of previously treated and untreated participants to be enrolled in this study is set at 13 and 25, respectively. The ANGIOTAX study reported that the progression-free survival at the second cycle (10 of 13 previously treated, 13 of 14 untreated) and median survival time (p=0.37 by log-rank test) were similar between previously treated and untreated patients. If at least three cases of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) are not confirmed at the 12-week efficacy evaluation in the first 20 participants out of the planned 38, the protocol treatment will be considered not effective enough, and early termination of the study will be discussed. Pembrolizumab and lenvatinib are unapproved drugs for cutaneous angiosarcoma in Japan and cannot be used in the medical insurance scheme. Participants enrolled in this study will have the opportunity to receive treatment with the off-label drugs of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib. Since the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib combination therapy for cutaneous angiosarcoma is unclear, it is unknown whether clinical benefits such as tumor shrinkage and prognosis extension will be obtained. However, although the cancer type is different, it has been reported that the combination of lenvatinib and an anti-PD-1 antibody showed enhanced tumor growth inhibition in renal cell carcinoma cell lines compared to the single administration of lenvatinib or an anti-PD-1 antibody. In addition, it has been suggested that lenvatinib increases the proportion of activated cytotoxic T cells in lymph nodes and reduces the proportion of TAM, an immunosuppressive cell, in tumor tissue. Since lenvatinib with an anti-PD-1 antibody may enhance the anti-tumor immune response, it is anticipated that the combination of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib may further enhance the therapeutic effect in cutaneous angiosarcoma. Pembrolizumab and lenvatinib may cause acute or late toxicities, including immune-related adverse events, which are expected disadvantages of participating in this study. Inclusion/exclusion criteria and treatment modification criteria were carefully considered to minimize the impact of such toxicities. The pembrolizumab and lenvatinib combination regimen was determined based on the phase 1b part of the phase 1b/2 trial 111/KEYNOTE-146. 111/KEYNOTE-146 was primarily aimed at determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and phase II recommended dose (RP2D) of lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab 200 mg IV Q3W (treatment dose for all approved indications at the beginning of 111/KEYNOTE-146 trial). The initial dose of lenvatinib was 24 mg QD (the starting dose currently approved as monotherapy for differentiated thyroid carcinoma) and was administered orally. The Phase 1b part of the trial enrolled 13 participants (pembrolizumab 200 mg IV Q3W plus lenvatinib 24 mg QD: n = 3; pembrolizumab 200 mg plus lenvatinib 20 mg QD: n = 10). Among the subjects, 8 had renal cell carcinoma, two non-small cell lung cancer, two endometrial cancer, and one melanoma. Two dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) occurred with pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W plus lenvatinib 24 mg QD (one participant experienced Grade 3 joint pain and the other Grade 3 exhaustion). No DLT was observed with pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W plus lenvatinib 20 mg QD. Accordingly, the RP2D of combination therapy was determined as pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W plus lenvatinib 20 mg QD. The RP2D was evaluated for efficacy and safety in the phase II study. Based on the encouraging antitumor effect and a tolerable safety profile found in multiple tumor types in the 111/KEYNOTE-146 trial, two Phase III trials, 309/KEYNOTE-775, and 307/KEYNOTE-581 have been initiated, and drug combinations have been approved in multiple regions for the treatment of these tumor types. One course of this study is set at 21 days. The length of each course will not be extended or shortened. After confirmation that the participant does not fall under any of the criteria for termination or suspension, 200 mg of pembrolizumab is administered intravenously on day 1 of each course in outpatient settings. The intravenous injection lasts 30 minutes, with an allowance of -5 to +10 minutes. If pembrolizumab cannot be administered (e.g., because the participant meets suspension criteria), its administration will be reconsidered on day 1 of the next course. Participants take 20 mg of lenvatinib capsule orally, once daily (from day 1 to 21 of every course). On the days when the participant receives both pembrolizumab and lenvatinib, either drug can be administered first. Lenvatinib should be taken at the same time every day as possible, regardless of whether it's taken with or without food or examination, before/after/between meals. This study's dose of pembrolizumab is only one level, 200 mg. Lenvatinib is started at 20 mg QD, which will be gradually tapered to 14 mg, 10 mg, and 8 mg if the participant falls under any of the dose reduction criteria. The minimum dose of lenvatinib is 8 mg QD, and a lower dose should not be accepted. Completion of protocol treatment is defined as completing 35 courses of pembrolizumab and/or lenvatinib. Tumor assessment is performed during the screening period, every 6 weeks from the initiation of protocol study to 24 weeks, and every 12 weeks afterward, by CT, MRI, or visual inspection (colored photograph). The modality and imaging conditions used at screening should be used for the consecutive assessments. Imaging tests or visual inspections should be continued until the overall response turns to PD or the post-study treatment starts. If the overall response of CR or PR was first detected, the next imaging test or visual inspection for confirmation should be performed 4 weeks after that day or later. An interim analysis will be conducted during the registration period to evaluate whether the response rate is inferior to that expected and determine if enrollment should be ceased (and the study be terminated due to ineffectiveness). The interim analysis will be conducted in accordance with a SWOG two-stage design. In the 1st stage, the enrollment is suspended when the 20th patient is enrolled, and the data, such as response evaluation used for the interim analysis, will be locked for around 12 weeks after the enrollment of the 20th patient. Even if the 20th patient is not evaluated 12 weeks after the start of treatment, the timing of the data lock will not be changed. The best overall response by central review will be used to calculate the response rate in the interim analysis. The FAS at the time of the interim analysis is the population analyzed. After fixation of the data on the best overall response by central review 6 months after the end of the registration period, an analysis mainly on the primary endpoint will be performed (the main analysis). The population analyzed will be FAS. The main analysis aims to determine whether the pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib therapy is sufficiently effective using the primary endpoint of overall response rate by central review. If the null hypothesis "the true response rate is below the threshold response rate (18%)" is not rejected, the primary endpoint is not significantly different from てthe ANGIOTAX trial, and the protocol treatment will not be considered superior. If the null hypothesis is rejected, the primary endpoint significantly differs from the ANGIOTAX trial, and the protocol treatment is considered superior after further consideration of the secondary endpoints. In this case, the application for approval of the combination therapy of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib to expand indications for treating unresectable cutaneous angiosarcoma will be considered.

Study to Assess Safety, Efficacy, and Cellular Kinetics of YTB323 in Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

This is an open-label, multi-center, non-confirmatory study intended to assess safety, efficacy, and cellular kinetics of YTB323 treatment in participants with treatment-resistant generalized myasthenia gravis in order to enable a benefit to risk assessment for further development in generalized myasthenia gravis (gMS). The study plans to enroll approximately 15 participants with treatment-resistant gMG. The study utilizes a single dose design across 2 cohorts, consisting of a sentinel cohort of 3 patients followed by an expansion cohort of an additional 12 patients. All participants dosed with YTB323 will be followed until 15 years after YTB323 administration in the Long-Term Follow-up (LTFU).

Phase 2 Study of Rapcabtagene Autoleucel in Myositis

This is a Phase 2, two-year, randomized, assessor- blinded, active-controlled study. This study comprises two cohorts: - A lead-in cohort enrolling participants to receive rapcabtagene autoleucel - A randomized cohort with participants receiving either rapcabtagene autoleucel or a comparator option. After end of study (EOS), participants who received rapcabtagene autoleucel infusion will enter a long-term follow-up (LTFU) period lasting up to 15 years after rapcabtagene autoleucel infusion. This LTFU will be described in a separate study protocol.

Hypothermia Versus Normothermia After Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest

Temperature control is a key neurointensive care for post-cardiac arrest patients. Although therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to be effective in the past, recent large randomized controlled trials have failed to demonstrate its efficacy. The international guidelines recommend temperature control under 37.7°C. However, the optimal temperature control, i.e., hypothermia versus normothermia, remains controversial. Additionally, randomized controlled trials that examined temperature control after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) are lacking. ECPR is a resuscitation technique using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for refractory cardiac arrest. In ECPR patients, ECMO using a heat exchanger can more rapidly achieve the targeted temperature as compared to other temperature control devices. Early cooling to achieve hypothermia after resuscitation is expected to be more effective for neuroprotection in the injured brain. Thus, the investigators hypothesized that hypothermia would be effective in ECPR patients. Furthermore, ECMO can stabilize the respiratory and circulatory status. Therefore, hypothermia, which may have side effects such as electrolyte abnormalities and arrhythmias, may be safely performed by ECMO. However, ECMO requires the administration of anticoagulants; therefore, it has the risk of hemorrhagic complications. Among patients receiving ECPR, bleeding is a common complication due to its relatively difficult procedure, considering the fact that emergent cannulation is performed under resuscitation. Additionally, CPR-related complications can also result in bleeding. These complications may be enhanced by hypothermia. Therefore, hypothermia after ECPR could contribute to a favorable outcome, but it could also cause bleeding. The SAVE-J NEUROTHERM trial is a cluster randomized trial that evaluated and compared the mortality risk, neurological outcomes, and adverse events between out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients who underwent hypothermia and normothermia after ECPR.

Long-term Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Lunsekimig (SAR443765) in Adult Participants With Moderatetosevere Asthma.

Enter Intervention Groups