Québéc, Canada

A Study of Adagrasib Plus Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Placebo Plus Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Participants With Previously Untreated Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With KRAS G12C Mutation (KRYSTAL-4)

A Study to Assess the Effectiveness and Safety of Pacritinib in Patients With VEXAS Syndrome (PAXIS)

This study is a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study (Part 1) followed by an open-label treatment period (Part 2) designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pacritinib for the prevention of VEXAS flares after glucocorticoid (GC) taper. The study will enroll patients ≥18 years with inflammatory VEXAS syndrome receiving ongoing GC therapy for ≥4 consecutive weeks, requiring between 15 and 45 mg daily (of prednisone / prednisolone or equivalent) at the time of enrollment (randomization). Patients will be randomized 1:1:1 to receive pacritinib dose A (n=26), pacritinib dose B plus placebo (n=26), or placebo (n=26) for up to 24 weeks during a double-blind treatment period, followed by treatment with pacritinib during an open-label treatment period for up to 48 weeks, and a 30-day post-End of Treatment (EOT) follow-up period. Randomization will be stratified by prescribed GC dose on the day of randomization. All outcomes will be reported by treatment arm, and pair-wise comparison between each pacritinib arm and placebo will be performed in the double-blind treatment period. Patients who complete the double-blind treatment period at End of Week 24 or meet Early Failure criteria at End of Week 12 will transition to an open-label pacritinib treatment period through End of Week 48. In addition, if a study arm closes due to interim futility or safety, all patients currently randomized to that arm will transition to open-label treatment. Study termination is planned approximately 1 year from the first dose of the last patient.

Hypothermia Versus Normothermia After Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest

Temperature control is a key neurointensive care for post-cardiac arrest patients. Although therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to be effective in the past, recent large randomized controlled trials have failed to demonstrate its efficacy. The international guidelines recommend temperature control under 37.7°C. However, the optimal temperature control, i.e., hypothermia versus normothermia, remains controversial. Additionally, randomized controlled trials that examined temperature control after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) are lacking. ECPR is a resuscitation technique using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for refractory cardiac arrest. In ECPR patients, ECMO using a heat exchanger can more rapidly achieve the targeted temperature as compared to other temperature control devices. Early cooling to achieve hypothermia after resuscitation is expected to be more effective for neuroprotection in the injured brain. Thus, the investigators hypothesized that hypothermia would be effective in ECPR patients. Furthermore, ECMO can stabilize the respiratory and circulatory status. Therefore, hypothermia, which may have side effects such as electrolyte abnormalities and arrhythmias, may be safely performed by ECMO. However, ECMO requires the administration of anticoagulants; therefore, it has the risk of hemorrhagic complications. Among patients receiving ECPR, bleeding is a common complication due to its relatively difficult procedure, considering the fact that emergent cannulation is performed under resuscitation. Additionally, CPR-related complications can also result in bleeding. These complications may be enhanced by hypothermia. Therefore, hypothermia after ECPR could contribute to a favorable outcome, but it could also cause bleeding. The SAVE-J NEUROTHERM trial is a cluster randomized trial that evaluated and compared the mortality risk, neurological outcomes, and adverse events between out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients who underwent hypothermia and normothermia after ECPR.

Multi-omics Study in Citrin Deficiency

Citrin deficiency (CD) is an inherited autosomal recessive metabolic condition that is also a secondary urea cycle disorder caused by mutations in the SLC25A13 gene, which encodes for the mitochondrial transporter, citrin. Citrin is a key component of the mitochondrial malate-aspartate shuttle (MAS) and is responsible for moving Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide (NADH) from the cytosol into the mitochondria via reducing equivalents such as malate, which drives mitochondrial respiration to produce energy in the form of adenosine triphosphate (ATP). The MAS is also critical in regulating Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide (NAD+/NADH) redox balance to maintain cytosolic redox-dependent metabolic pathways such as glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, amino acid metabolism, and lipid metabolism. Citrin is also required to supply cytosolic aspartate, which is the substrate of one of the urea cycle enzymes, namely argininosuccinate synthetase 1, and thus important for the proper functioning of the urea cycle. The clinical presentations of citrin deficiency often vary widely between patients but can generally be distinguished by distinct clinical phenotypes, which are neonatal intrahepatic cholestasis caused by citrin deficiency (NICCD) that affects infants, the "failure to thrive and dyslipidemia" form of CD (FTTDCD) in childhood, the adaptation or silent period, and citrullinemia type II (CTLN2), which represents the most severe form of the condition. While only a small percentage of CD patients develop CTLN2, the prognosis for these patients is typically poor. It is notable that all CD patients above 1 year old (post-NICCD) naturally develop a characteristic food preference that favors a diet rich in protein and fat while being low in carbohydrates. Other clinical findings observed in some CD patients include fatty liver, fatigue, hypoglycemia, and failure to thrive. There is currently no effective cure for CD. Before the onset of CTLN2, patients are primarily managed by diet control with a low carbohydrate, high protein and high-fat diet, as well as medium chain triglyceride (MCT) supplementation. CTLN2 patients have been treated with sodium pyruvate, arginine, and MCT with limited success, with severe cases requiring liver transplantation as the only solution. There are currently no specific biomarkers that effectively track the disease progression, making it challenging to monitor how well patients are actually doing or to measure the effectiveness of therapies. Without proper management or timely medical interventions, patients may develop CTLN2. Given the urgent and unmet need for biomarkers specific to CD, the main goal of this study is to uncover disease-specific biomarkers by analyzing blood samples collected from CD patients using both targeted and untargeted metabolomics, proteomics, lipidomics, and transcriptomics. Targeted omics will involve the analysis of cellular pathways associated with the condition, such as the MAS pathway, glycolysis, protein metabolism, de novo lipogenesis, lipolysis, gluconeogenesis, NAD+ metabolism, ureagenesis, and the glutamine synthetase pathway. Identification of such biomarkers will allow a deeper understanding of the disease pathogenesis. Importantly, these biomarkers may enable better tracking of disease progression and may help to prevent the onset of CTLN2. Finally, these biomarkers will also greatly benefit the development of effective therapeutic options for CD in clinical trials by serving as measurable endpoints. Obtaining the necessary material from patients consists of a minimally invasive venous blood sampling taken during a regular outpatient visit and after the informed consent of the patients or caretakers.

Study of Olomorasib (LY3537982) in Combination With Standard of Care in Participants With Resected or Unresectable KRAS G12C-mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

A Clinical Study of Pembrolizumab (+) Berahyaluronidase Alfa (MK-3475A) to Treat Newly-diagnosed Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (MK-3475A-F84)

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tulisokibart (MK-7240) in Participants With Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease (MK-7240-008)

The protocol consists of 2 studies. Study 1 includes induction and maintenance treatment, and Study 2 includes only induction treatment. Each study has its own hypotheses and outcome measures that will be assessed independently.

A Study of Eltrekibart and Mirikizumab in Adult Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

The study will last approximately 4-5 years. Screening is required within 35 days prior to enrollment. For each participant, the total duration of the clinical trial will be about 69 weeks including screening.

LIVERAGE™ - Cirrhosis: A Study to Test Whether Survodutide Helps People With a Liver Disease Called NASH/MASH Who Have Cirrhosis

LIVERAGE™: A Study to Test Whether Survodutide Helps People With a Liver Disease Called NASH/MASH Who Have Moderate or Advanced Liver Fibrosis