Parana Entre Rios, Argentina

4D-150 in Patients With Macular Neovascularization Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Adding the Immunotherapy Drug Cemiplimab to Usual Treatment for People With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Had Previous Treatment With Platinum Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy (An Expanded Lung-MAP Treatment Trial)

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To compare overall survival (OS) between participants randomized to docetaxel and ramucirumab with or without cemiplimab (REGN2810) who have acquired resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy and immunotherapy for stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 between the arms. II. To compare investigator-assessed response rates (confirmed or unconfirmed, complete response [CR] or partial response [PR]) per RECIST 1.1 between the arms among participants with measurable disease. III. To compare the investigator-assessed disease control rate (confirmed or unconfirmed, complete response [CR], or partial response [PR], and stable disease) between the arms. IV. To evaluate the duration of response (DoR) among responders within each arm. V. To evaluate the frequency and severity of toxicities within each arm. VI. To compare investigator-assessed PFS between the arms within the subgroups defined by the stratification factors (histology and performance status) and by PD-L1 subgroups defined as PD-L1 negative (< 1% tumor proportion score [TPS]), intermediate PD-L1 (1-49% TPS), and PD-L1 high (>= 50% TPS). VII. To compare OS between the arms within the subgroups defined by the stratification factors (histology and performance status) and by PD-L1 subgroups defined as PD-L1 negative (< 1% TPS), intermediate PD-L1 (1-49% TPS), and PD-L1 high (>= 50% TPS). TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE OBJECTIVES: I. To collect, process, and bank cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (cfDNA) at baseline, cycle 3 day 1, and progression for future development of a proposal to evaluate comprehensive next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). II. To establish a tissue/blood repository to pursue future studies. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive dexamethasone orally (PO) twice daily (BID) on days 0-2, ramucirumab intravenously (IV) over 30-60 minutes on day 1 and docetaxel IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additionally, patients undergo blood sample collection, and computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) throughout the study. ARM II: Patients receive dexamethasone PO BID on days 0-2, ramucirumab IV over 30-60 minutes on day 1, docetaxel IV over 60 minutes on day 1, and cemiplimab IV over 30 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additionally, patients undergo blood sample collection, and CT or MRI throughout the study. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3-6 months for up to 3 years after randomization.

A Study of Adjuvant Cretostimogene Grenadenorepvec for Treatment of Intermediate Risk NMIBC Following TURBT

Participants will be randomized 1:1 to cretostimogene grenadenorepvec after TURBT (Arm A) vs observation after TURBT (Arm B). Participants in Arm A will receive an induction course and then quarterly maintenance courses of cretostimogene through Month 13, if there is no disease recurrence. Disease status will be assessed using urine cytology, complete bladder visualization (e.g., cystoscopy), and directed TURBT/biopsy (if indicated) every 3 months for the first 2 years after randomization and then every 6 months for an additional year or until disease recurrence. Participants in Arm B who recur with IR-NMIBC after TURBT and observation will be offered treatment with cretostimogene as per the treatment schedule in Arm A.

Mobile Health for Adherence in Breast Cancer Patients

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To compare CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) adherence at 12 months after completion of the baseline survey captured using electronic monitoring between the EUC (Arm A) and CONCURxP (Arm B) arms. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare CDK4/6i adherence at 12 months after completion of the baseline survey captured through self-report between the EUC (Arm A) and CONCURxP (Arm B) arms. II. To compare CDK4/6i persistence at 12 months after completion of the baseline survey captured using electronic monitoring between the EUC (Arm A) and CONCURxP (Arm B) arms. III. To compare symptom burden at 12 months between the EUC (Arm A) and CONCURxP (Arm B) arms. IV. To compare quality of life at 12 months between the EUC (Arm A) and CONCURxP (Arm B) arms. V. To compare patient-provider communication at 12 months between the EUC (Arm A) and CONCURxP (Arm B) arms. VI. To compare self-efficacy for managing symptoms at 12 months between the EUC (Arm A) and CONCURxP (Arm B) arms. VII. To compare financial worry at 12 months between the EUC (Arm A) and CONCURxP (Arm B) arms. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess longitudinal changes of patient-reported outcomes (self reported adherence, symptom burden, quality of life, and financial worry) from the EUC (Arm A) and CONCURxP (Arm B) arms. II. To compare healthcare utilization at 12 months between the EUC (Arm A) and CONCURxP (Arm B) arms. III. To compare progression-free survival at 12 months between the EUC (Arm A) and CONCURxP (Arm B) arms. IV. To compare overall survival at 12 months between the EUC (Arm A) and CONCURxP (Arm B) arms. V. To describe CONCURxP (Arm B) patients and their provider experience with various implementation outcomes. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized into 1 of 2 arms. Non-patient participants are assigned to arm C. ARM A: Patients use the WiseBag medication dispenser and receive access to educational materials every 4 weeks over 12 months. ARM B: Patients use the WiseBag medication dispenser and receive personalized text message reminders, medication tracking and healthcare provider follow ups as part of the CONCURxP platform over 12 months. Patients may complete an interview over 20-30 minutes within 6 months of study completion. ARM C: Participants complete an interview over 20-30 minutes 15-39 months post-first patient enrollment. After completion of study intervention, patients may be followed up to 6 months.

Targeted Treatment for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer That Has Increased Copies of the MET Gene (An Expanded Lung-MAP Treatment Trial)

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) (confirmed and unconfirmed, complete and partial) in participants with MET amplification-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with amivantamab-SC within each cohort. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) within each cohort. II. To evaluate overall survival (OS) within each cohort. III. To evaluate the duration of response among responders within each cohort. IV. To evaluate the frequency and severity of toxicities within each cohort and combined across all study participants. TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE OBJECTIVES: I. To collect, process, and bank cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (cfDNA) prior to treatment on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, and at first progression for future development of a proposal to evaluate comprehensive next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA). II. To establish a tissue/blood repository from participants with refractory non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). OUTLINE: Patients receive amivantamab subcutaneously (SC) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycle 1 and then on days 1 and 15 of subsequent cycles. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and collection of blood samples throughout the trial. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for up to 3 years.

The PLATINUM Trial: Optimizing Chemotherapy for the Second-Line Treatment of Metastatic BRCA1/2 or PALB2-Associated Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate and compare overall response rate (ORR) in patients with BRCA1/2 or PALB2 mutant pancreas cancer whose disease has progressed on front-line fluorouracil, irinotecan, leucovorin and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) treated with nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and cisplatin (NABPLAGEM) = nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and cisplatin (arm 1) versus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine (arm 2). (Phase II) II. To evaluate and compare overall survival (OS) time in patients with BRCA1/2 or PALB2 mutant whose disease has progressed on front-line FOLFIRINOX treated with 1) NABPLAGEM = nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and cisplatin (arm 1) versus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine (arm 2). (Phase III) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate and compare progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) criteria between 2 treatment arms. II. To evaluate and compare duration of response (DoR) between 2 treatment arms. III. To evaluate and compare CA19-9 response (defined as patients with a baseline CA19-9 >= 2x upper limit of normal (ULN) who demonstrate a minimum 25% decrease in CA19-9 at any time point) between 2 treatment arms. IV. To evaluate and compare toxicity profile as assessed by treating clinicians between 2 treatment arms. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive nab-paclitaxel intravenously (IV) over 30-40 minutes, gemcitabine IV over 30-40 minutes, and cisplatin IV over 30-60 minutes on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) throughout the trial. Patients may optionally undergo blood sample collection at baseline and on study. ARM II: Patients receive nab-paclitaxel IV over 30-40 minutes and gemcitabine IV over 30-40 minutes on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo MRI or CT throughout the trial. Patients may optionally undergo blood sample collection at baseline and on study. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up within 30 days and then every 3 months for 2 years or until death, whichever comes first.

A Study to Test Whether BI 764524 Helps People With an Eye Condition Called Diabetic Retinopathy

Ramucirumab Plus Pembrolizumab vs Usual Care for Treatment of Stage IV or Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Following Immunotherapy, Pragmatica-Lung Study

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To compare overall survival (OS) in participants previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and immunotherapy for stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) randomized to pembrolizumab and ramucirumab versus standard of care. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: I. To summarize reports of serious and unexpected high-grade (>= grade 3) treatment-related adverse events determined by the treating physician within each treatment arm. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM A: Patients receive chemotherapy per standard of care on study. ARM B: Patients receive ramucirumab intravenously (IV) and pembrolizumab IV on study.

Testing the Addition of High Dose, Targeted Radiation to the Usual Treatment for Locally-Advanced Inoperable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the overall survival in patients with stage II-IIIC inoperable node-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after image guided, motion-managed conventional radiotherapy to the primary tumor and nodal metastases (Arm 1) or after image guided, motion-managed stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the primary tumor followed by conventionally fractionated radiotherapy to nodal metastases (Arm 2) both given with concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy. II. To compare progression-free survival between the experimental arm (Arm 2) and control arm (Arm 1). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare objective response rate (as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] version [v] 1.1) between the experimental arm and control arm. II. To compare the rate of local control between the experimental arm and control arm. III. To compare patterns of failure (primary, locoregional, or distant) between the experimental arm and control arm. IV. To compare changes in pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide [DLCO] assessed at randomization and at 6- and 12- months following completion of radiation therapy) between the experimental arm and control arm. V. To compare changes in quality of life and patient-reported outcomes assessed from pre-treatment to 3 months following radiation therapy of each treatment arm. VI. To determine acute and late toxicity profiles of each treatment arm as measured by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To characterize and compare longitudinal quality of life and patient-reported outcomes of each treatment arm. II. To collect biospecimens at baseline, after SBRT (for Arm 2 patients), during last 2 weeks of chemoradiation, and after first dose of consolidation therapy, to allow for future analyses. III. To collect 4-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) planning scans and radiation dose to calculate regional lung ventilation and explore pre-treatment 4D-CT based ventilation to predict pulmonary toxicity. IV. To characterize clinical outcomes, toxicities and changes in pulmonary function and quality of life among patients receiving proton and photon radiotherapy. V. To develop and characterize a machine learning/artificial intelligence algorithm for radiotherapy planning and/or quality assurance. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients undergo conventional IGRT and receive usual care chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel intravenously (IV) followed by carboplatin IV weekly (Q7D) during radiotherapy or pemetrexed IV followed by carboplatin IV every 21 days during radiotherapy or etoposide IV on days 1 to 5 and days 29 to 33 followed by cisplatin IV on days 1, 8, 29, and 36 or pemetrexed IV followed by cisplatin IV every 21 days during radiotherapy. Patients then receive consolidation durvalumab IV every 2 or 4 weeks for up to one year in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo CT and/or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT during follow-up. ARM II: Patients undergo SBRT and conventional IGRT and receive standard-of-care chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel IV followed by carboplatin IV Q7D during radiotherapy or pemetrexed IV followed by carboplatin IV every 21 days during radiotherapy or etoposide IV on days 1 to 5 and days 29 to 33 followed by cisplatin IV on days 1, 8, 29, and 36 or pemetrexed IV followed by cisplatin IV every 21 days during radiotherapy. Patients then receive consolidation durvalumab IV every 2 or 4 weeks for up to one year in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo CT and/or PET/CT during follow-up. Patients are followed up every 3 months for 1 year, every 6 months during years 2 and 3, and then yearly after that for the duration of the study.

Pembrolizumab vs. Observation in People With Triple-negative Breast Cancer Who Had a Pathologic Complete Response After Chemotherapy Plus Pembrolizumab

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate whether observation results in a non-inferior recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared to adjuvant pembrolizumab in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients who achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pembrolizumab. II. To compare quality of life (QOL) at approximately 27 weeks as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) Trial Outcome Index between patients randomized to adjuvant pembrolizumab versus observation. (Quality of Life) III. To assess the social value of de-escalation of adjuvant breast cancer immunotherapy at approximately 27 weeks and, by modeling, over a lifetime. (Value of Care) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate whether observation compared to adjuvant pembrolizumab impacts the following: Ia. RFS by stage at presentation and by receipt of prior anthracycline therapy; Ib. Adverse event rate: difference in Grade 3 or higher adverse event rates overall and Grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events (irAEs) rates; Ic. Overall Survival (OS); Id. Locoregional recurrence (LRR both isolated LRR as first events and LRR events simultaneous with DM); Ie. RFS, LRR, OS, adverse events, and QOL by age (=< 45, 46-65, and > 65), race, and ethnicity; If. Adverse events related to receipt of radiotherapy. II. To assess the value of de-escalation of breast cancer immunotherapy from the payer perspective at approximately 27 weeks and, by modelling, over a lifetime. (Value of Care) III. To compare patient out-of-pocket costs at approximately 27 weeks between patients randomized to adjuvant pembrolizumab versus observation. (Value of Care) IV. To compare financial toxicity at approximately 27 weeks between patients randomized to adjuvant pembrolizumab versus observation. (Value of Care) V. To compare work/productivity impairment at approximately 27 weeks between patients randomized to adjuvant pembrolizumab versus observation. (Value of Care) EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To describe trajectories of QOL over time among patients randomized to adjuvant pembrolizumab versus (vs.) observation. (Quality of Life) II. To compare various QOL domains after approximately 27 weeks as assessed by the 5 subscales of the FACT-B Index between patients randomized to adjuvant pembrolizumab versus observation. (Quality of Life) III. To compare self-reported symptomatic adverse events at approximately 27 weeks assessed by the patient reported outcome Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) between patients randomized to adjuvant pembrolizumab versus observation. (Quality of Life) IV. To describe trajectories of financial toxicity and work/productivity impairment over time from baseline to approximately 27 weeks among patients randomized to adjuvant pembrolizumab versus observation. (Value of Care) V. To develop and assess a measure of value from the patient perspective at approximately 27 weeks. (Value of Care) OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms after completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy in combination with pembrolizumab, followed by definitive breast surgery. ARM I (PEMBROLIZUMAB): Patients receive pembrolizumab intravenously (IV) on study. Patients also undergo tumor biopsy on study, and collection of blood on study and during follow-up. ARM II (OBSERVATION): Patients undergo observation on study. Patients also undergo tumor biopsy on study, and collection of blood on study and during follow-up.