Rectal Arterial Embolization vs Band Ligation for the Treatment of Internal hemOrrhoidS

Last updated: May 6, 2026
Sponsor: Jessica K. Stewart, MD
Overall Status: Active - Recruiting

Phase

N/A

Condition

Hereditary Angioedema

Hemorrhoids

Treatment

Hemorrhoidal Artery Embolization

Rubber Band Ligation

Clinical Study ID

NCT07559630
25-2437
  • Ages 18-89
  • All Genders

Study Summary

The purpose of this clinical trial is to compare two standard of care non-surgical treatments for hemorrhoidal bleeding: hemorrhoidal artery embolization (HAE) versus rubber band ligation (RBL). Directly comparing these two methods may help to clarify which treatment is better for controlling hemorrhoidal bleeding, reducing symptoms, and improving patients' quality of life.

HAE is a standard minimally invasive procedure to put tiny particles or coils into the blood vessel that feeds a hemorrhoid to block the blood flow (embolization). This involves using a catheter inserted into an artery, using twilight (conscious) sedation.

RBL is a standard procedure that involves using small rubber bands around the base of the hemorrhoids to cut off blood flow, causing it to shrink or shrivel.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years and less than 90 years.

  2. Ability to provide written informed consent.

  3. Documented clinical history of chronic bleeding from internal hemorrhoids.

  4. Documented presence of Goligher grade II-III internal hemorrhoids.

  5. Failed conservative treatment for bleeding hemorrhoids (e.g. fiber supplementation,topical ointments and creams, dietary modifications, stool softeners, warm baths).

  6. Able to comply with all treatments and protocol follow-up visits, in the opinion ofthe PI's.

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Moderate loss of kidney function, defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate ofless than 45 mL/min.

  2. Significant arterial atherosclerosis that would limit selective angiography.

  3. Known alternative causes of GI bleeding.

  4. Allergy to iodinated contrast agents.

  5. Active infection or malignancy.

  6. Pregnancy.

  7. Active nicotine use within the last 12 months.

  8. Portal hypertension/rectal varices.

  9. Uncorrectable coagulopathy (INR > 2; Platelet count <100,000; PTT > 40 sec).

  10. Findings on baseline CTA that adversely affect treatment, based on PI's clinicaljudgment, including but not limited to stenosis, occlusion, or hypoplasia of thesuperior and/or middle rectal arteries.

Study Design

Total Participants: 40
Treatment Group(s): 2
Primary Treatment: Hemorrhoidal Artery Embolization
Phase:
Study Start date:
May 29, 2026
Estimated Completion Date:
November 30, 2031

Study Description

A single center, prospective, open-label, double arm, randomized trial to compare rates of control of bleeding from hemorrhoids, during prospective follow-up in patients with internal hemorrhoids undergoing hemorrhoidal artery embolization (HAE) versus rubber band ligation (RBL), and the number of procedures needed for hemostasis.

Subjects will be considered enrolled in the study once they have provided informed consent. They will then be randomized to one of two arms after completion of the in-person screening visit. Subjects may proceed to the procedure visit after they have met all screening eligibility criteria.

The study will involve a screening period in which patient eligibility is determined. Once eligibility is confirmed, subjects will then be randomized to HAE or RBL in a 1:1 ratio. A total of 40 subjects will be enrolled in the study and followed for a duration of up to 18 months. All study subjects will undergo the initial procedures, consisting of a physical exam, vital signs, medical history, review of medications, laboratory blood evaluations, anascopy, and completion of completion of the hemorrhoidal disease symptom score (HDSS), the short health scale for hemorrhoidal disease (SHSHD), French bleeding score (FBS), and the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score questionnaires.

After treatment follow-up visits will be at 1 week (7 days ± 2 days), 1 month (4 weeks ± 1 week), retreatment (as needed), 2 months (8 weeks ± 2 weeks), 3 months (12 weeks ± 2 weeks), 6 months (24 weeks ± 2 weeks), and 12 months (52 weeks ± 4 weeks) post-procedure. At these visits, subjects will complete all or some of the following: completion of the HDSS, SHSHD, FBS, VAS, and treatment satisfaction questionnaires, review current medications, undergo a directed physical examination, complete laboratory evaluations, anoscopy, CTA abdomen/ pelvis imaging, and report any new adverse events (AEs).

At 6 months, subjects will have the option to crossover because of continued bleeding. Subjects in the crossover group will undergo treatment with the other treatment modality, with follow up at 1 week (7 days ± 2 days), 1 month (4 weeks ± 1 week), retreatment (as needed), 2 months (8 weeks ± 2 weeks), 3 months (12 weeks ± 2 weeks), 6 months (24 weeks ± 2 weeks), and 12 months (52 weeks ± 4 weeks).

Connect with a study center

  • Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California 90095
    United States

    Active - Recruiting

Map preview placeholder

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.