Study Objective:
This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of the Dynamic Navigation System in performing
implant placement for full arch prosthesis rehabilitation. This system uses landmarks,
including bone screws fixed to the bone (Group 1), and landmarks on remaining teeth to be
extracted (Group 2), to accurately determine the placement of the implants
Participants:
Patients aged 18 and older, who have total tooth loss or partial tooth loss, and are
candidates for full arch implant-supported prosthesis rehabilitation, are invited to
participate, provided they meet the necessary health requirements for surgery.
Group 1: Patients who have total tooth loss or partial tooth loss but do not meet the
following conditions:
Having at least 3 remaining teeth or roots with mobility no greater than grade 1,
and
The remaining teeth are distributed with at least 1 tooth in the front and 1 tooth
in the back on each side of the arch. These patients will have bone screws placed on
the bone to serve as landmarks for implant placement using the dynamic navigation
system.
Group 2: Patients who have at least 3 remaining teeth, all with mobility no greater than
grade 1, and at least one tooth in the front and one in the back on each side of the
arch. These teeth will serve as landmarks for implant placement.
Study Methodology:
Group 1: Patients who have total or partial tooth loss, and do not meet the conditions of
having at least 3 remaining teeth with mobility no greater than grade 1, and having at
least one tooth in the front and one in the back on each side, will have bone screws
placed on the bone as landmarks for implant placement.
Group 2: Patients with at least 3 remaining teeth with mobility no greater than grade 1,
and at least one tooth in the front and one in the back on each side, will use these
teeth as landmarks for implant placement.
After surgery, the implant deviation from the planned implant data will be evaluated to
assess the accuracy of implant placement.
Factors such as implant position deviation, surgery time, and complications will be
evaluated to compare the effectiveness between the two groups.
Benefits and Risks:
Benefits:
Improved accuracy in implant placement using the Dynamic Navigation System.
Cost of using the Dynamic Navigation System and the cost of bone screws for
patients without sufficient remaining teeth are covered by the study.
Scientific contribution to improving implant placement methods for future
patients.
Risks:
Surgical risks including infection, pain, swelling, and potential implant
failure, which can occur even without the use of the dynamic navigation system.
Radiation exposure from imaging tests, particularly CBCT scans, will be
required. The radiation exposure is minimal and within safe limits.
Slight increase in surgery time, typically 2-5 minutes longer than traditional
surgery, for preparation and calibration of the navigation system to ensure its
proper functionality.
For Group 1 participants, bone screws (4-6 screws) will be placed along the jaw
arch where the implants are to be positioned.