EFFICACY of INTRAOPERATIVE ARISTA POLYSACCHARIDE APPLICATION on the POSTOPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS in PATIENTS UNDERGOING RARP for the TREATMENT of PROSTATE CANCER

Last updated: February 13, 2025
Sponsor: St. Antonius Hospital Gronau
Overall Status: Active - Recruiting

Phase

N/A

Condition

Hemorrhage

Prostate Cancer, Early, Recurrent

Prostate Disorders

Treatment

Arm A - Application of 5g of ARISTA™ AH

Clinical Study ID

NCT06822036
2023-601-f-S
  • Ages 45-68
  • Male

Study Summary

Background and aim of the study: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is one of the most commonly used treatment options for localized prostate cancer (PCa). Blood loss and deterioration of erectile function is, however, a common unwanted side effect of RP. Previous series demonstrated that the robot-assisted RP (RARP) approach is associated with lower blood-loss rates than open RP. However, several factors might contribute to higher blood loss rates at RARP: First, ileus still represents a major complication. To further reduce complication rates of postoperative ileus most high-volume centers lower the intraabdominal pressure during RARP, which in turn might lead to higher estimated blood loss rates. Second, to improve functional outcomes such as erectile function and early recovery of urinary continence, many surgeons perform intrafascial nerve sparing, which is considered a dissection that follows the periprostatic fasica and allows a whole-thickness preservation of the neurovascular bundles. Ideally, many surgeons aim to avoid thermal application in favor of optimal nerve sparing quality. Moreover, partial or complete secondary resection in context of intraoperative frozen section protocols such as NeuroSafe might further increase risk of blood loss. Taken together, to enable best balance between low intraabdominal pressure as primary prevention of postoperative ileus, maximum nerve sparing quality (i.e. intrafascial approach) and low blood loss rates, atraumatic and athermal hemostatic measures such as polysaccharide application are needed. Thus, we perform a multicenter randomized controlled prospective study with superiority trial design, in which such hemostat agent is applied to the neurovascular bundle areas. We examine if such agent leads to a relevant clinical improvement indicated by higher postoperative hemoglobin levels compared to the control group. As an exploratory co-primary endpoint of interest, we examine erectile function after RARP. Erectile dysfunction (ED) after RP is caused by several different mechanisms and commonly multifactorial. However, one of the main reasons for ED after RP is injury to the cavernous nerves during surgery. Currently, nerve-sparing surgical approaches are commonly performed, if oncologically appropriate, to minimize postoperative potency decline. Notwithstanding improvements of nerve-sparing techniques, a certain degree of nerve damage during surgery is inevitable. In order to keep the rates of postoperative ED at a minimum, it is reasonable to stabilize the cavernous nerves during surgery. In a previous pilot conducted by Chedid et al, the polysaccharide ARISTA™ AH was applicated on the cavernous nerves during robot-assisted RP (RARP) to optimize hemostasis. Later analysis of the study results revealed unexpectedly high potency rates in those men. This observation raised the question, if ARISTA™ AH may have the potential to stabilize the cavernous nerves and thus ameliorate postoperative potency rates. As the previous study by Chedid et al was originally not designed for this endpoint and did not have a control group, we are planning to evaluate this question as a meaningful exploratory co-primary endpoint in the same study cohort.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age range ≥ 45 to ≥68 yrs

  • Biopsy proven prostate cancer treated with robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

  • Intrafascial nerve sparing surgery (unilaterally or bilaterally)

  • Preoperative urinary continence

  • Group A Preoperative unassisted International Index of Erectile function (IIEF)-5score range 8-16 (i.e. moderate (8-11) and mild to moderate (12-16))

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe intellectual limitations preventing to fully understand the study concept andits content

  • High risk prostate cancer (PSA ≥ 20 ng/ml or biopsy Gleason-Score ≥ 8 or suspectedT4)

  • Suspected bone or visceral metastases at preoperative imaging Neoadjuvant androgendeprivation therapy

  • Any prior local therapy of the prostate (including subvesical deobstruction orradiation therapy)

  • Any prior chemotherapy or colon/rectal surgery

  • Any prior pelvic trauma that required surgical intervention

  • Depression or other psychological or neurological disease (dementia, schizophrenia,bipolar disorder etc.)

  • Peyronie's disease

  • Polyneuropathia

  • IPSS Score >19 and QoL >3

  • Bilateral secondary (complete or partial) resection of the neurovascular bundle

  • No contraindications for phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor intake (i.e. suited formost penile rehabilitation regimes)

  • Any endocrine function disorder (not including diabetes)

SURGICAL AND PERIOPERATIVE EXLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Accessory pudendal arteries (APA) preservation, if an APA is identified

  • For a) nerve sparing and b) controlling bleeding in the area of the prostate bed andneurovascular bundles after prostate removal, no monopolar thermal application areallowed but suturing and clip application is allowed. For secondary resection of theneurovascular bundle and controlling bleeding, mono- or bipolar thermal application,clip application and suturing is allowed.

  • No surgical revision within 7d after RARP (Clavien Dindo classified complication ≥3b)

  • No definitive anastomotic partial or complete rupture (identified via cystogramwithin 30d after RARP)

Study Design

Total Participants: 362
Treatment Group(s): 1
Primary Treatment: Arm A - Application of 5g of ARISTA™ AH
Phase:
Study Start date:
January 16, 2025
Estimated Completion Date:
January 30, 2027

Connect with a study center

  • Martini Klinik am UKE GmbH

    Hamburg, HH 20246
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • St. Antonius-Hospital Gronau GmbH, Klinik für Urologie, Urologische Onkologie und Roboter-assistierte Chirurgie

    Gronau, NRW 48599
    Germany

    Active - Recruiting

  • Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie des Universitätsklinikums Leipzig

    Leipzig, Saxony 04103
    Germany

    Site Not Available

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.