Randomized Trial of UI-EWD vs. Conventional Endoscopic Therapy for Bleeding Ulcers

Last updated: May 2, 2025
Sponsor: Medtronic - MITG
Overall Status: Active - Recruiting

Phase

N/A

Condition

Ulcers

Hemorrhage

Gastrointestinal Diseases And Disorders

Treatment

Conventional therapy

UI-EWD

Clinical Study ID

NCT06188585
MDT23013
  • Ages > 22
  • All Genders

Study Summary

A prospective, multi-center, noninferiority randomized controlled trial designed to compare the efficacy of UI-EWD (Nexpowder™) hemostatic powder versus conventional endoscopic hemostatic therapy in patients presenting with acute overt gastrointestinal bleeding which is found at endoscopy to be due to a gastric or duodenal ulcer with active bleeding (spurting or oozing) or a non-bleeding visible vessel.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults age 22 years or older

  2. Presentation with acute overt gastrointestinal bleeding (hematemesis, melena, and/orhematochezia)

  3. Subject voluntarily agrees to participate in the clinical investigation, provideswritten informed consent, and will be able to comply with the investigationalprotocol in the opinion of the site investigator

  4. Cause of bleeding as determined at endoscopy is gastric or duodenal ulcer bleedingwith active spurting or oozing bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel. Thedefinition of "active oozing" will require bleeding to persist for ≥ 3 minutes ofendoscopic observation.

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Incarceration

  2. Subjects that are not able to provide written informed consent

  3. Subject already hospitalized for another condition when UGIB begins

  4. Pregnancy or nursing mothers

  5. Endoscopic hemostatic treatment in the past 30 days

  6. Use of triple antithrombotic therapy at the time of presentation

  7. Subjects who underwent gastric or duodenal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) orendoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedures within the past 2 months

  8. Platelet count < 50 x 10^9/L

  9. INR > 3.5 (or prothrombin time >35 seconds in patient not on warfarin and onlyprothrombin time is provided by local lab), at time of procedure or closest toprocedure time

  10. Subjects who have documented galactose intolerance, Lapp lactase deficiency orglucose-galactose malabsorption

  11. Subjects with documented hypersensitivity to Brilliant Blue FCF

  12. Subjects with suspected bowel obstruction or gastrointestinal fistulas, and thosesuspected or are at high risk of having gastrointestinal perforation.

  13. Endoscopy not performed within 30 hours of presentation

Study Design

Total Participants: 278
Treatment Group(s): 2
Primary Treatment: Conventional therapy
Phase:
Study Start date:
June 21, 2024
Estimated Completion Date:
August 31, 2026

Study Description

Endoscopic hemostatic therapy is recommended as the first line therapy for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) due to ulcers with active bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel identified at endoscopy. A variety of endoscopic modalities are used in the treatment of UGIB, including thermal therapies (e.g., bipolar electrocoagulation), injection therapy (e.g., epinephrine), clips, and hemostatic powder spray. Topical therapies, such as hemostatic powder spray, have been the most recent addition to the armamentarium of endoscopic therapies for UGIB.

UI-EWD hemostatic powder (Nexpowder™), which is manufactured by NextBiomedical and distributed by Medtronic, is approved for treatment of nonvariceal UGIB in the U.S., Canada, European Union and other countries.

A retrospective study of UI-EWD hemostatic powder in 56 patients with active bleeding found immediate hemostasis in 54 (96.4%), with rebleeding within 7 days in only 2 patients (3.7%)[1]. A large multi-center randomized trial in 340 patients with nonvariceal UGIB and either active bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel compared conventional endoscopic hemostatic therapy alone to conventional therapy plus UI-EWD. Rebleeding was significantly lower in the UI-EWD group at 3 days (3 vs. 11%) and at 30 days (19% vs. 7%) [2].

The primary aim of this trial is to demonstrate that UI-EWD when used as initial hemostatic therapy is non-inferior to older conventional endoscopic hemostatic therapy for the treatment of patients with high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding.

Connect with a study center

  • McGill University

    Montréal, Quebec
    Canada

    Active - Recruiting

  • St. Michael's Hospital

    Toronto,
    Canada

    Site Not Available

  • Vancouver General Hospital

    Vancouver,
    Canada

    Active - Recruiting

  • Copenhagen University Hospital

    Hvidovre,
    Denmark

    Active - Recruiting

  • Odense University Hospital

    Odense,
    Denmark

    Site Not Available

  • St. Antoine

    Paris,
    France

    Active - Recruiting

  • Emek Medical Center

    Afula,
    Israel

    Active - Recruiting

  • Cleveland Clinic London

    London,
    United Kingdom

    Active - Recruiting

  • University of Alabama

    Birmingham, Alabama 35205
    United States

    Active - Recruiting

  • Yale

    New Haven, Connecticut 06520
    United States

    Active - Recruiting

  • RUSH University

    Chicago, Illinois 60612
    United States

    Active - Recruiting

  • Brigham and Women's Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts 02115
    United States

    Active - Recruiting

  • Rutgers University

    Piscataway, New Jersey 08901
    United States

    Active - Recruiting

  • Northwell Health

    Manhasset, New York 11030
    United States

    Active - Recruiting

  • NYU Langone

    New York, New York 10016
    United States

    Site Not Available

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.