Platform Adaptive Embedded Trial for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Last updated: December 13, 2022
Sponsor: Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Overall Status: Active - Recruiting

Phase

4

Condition

Respiratory Failure

Lung Injury

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Ards)

Treatment

N/A

Clinical Study ID

NCT05658692
2022-0770
  • Ages > 18
  • All Genders

Study Summary

Platform adaptive embedded trial for acute respiratory distress syndrome (PETARDS) is a randomized, embedded, multifactorial, adaptive platform trial for ARDS. The study aimed to assess the impact of multiple interventions on outcomes in patients with ARDS admitted to the ICU.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria: Adult patients (18 years and older, regardless of gender) admitted to the ICU with ARDS;Intubation and mechanical ventilation; Moderate/severe ARDS defined by Berlin criteria (PaO2/FiO2 ≤200mmHg, PEEP ≥5cmH20); Moderate/severe ARDS less than 48 hours beforerandomization.

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria: Pregnancy or breastfeeding; Known allergy to the intervention drug; Daily use of anintervention drug or measure within the past 15 days; Intervention drugs or measuresprimarily intended to treat other conditions (eg, septic shock); Patients using theintervention drug or standard for two or more days during hospitalization; Patients areexpected to die within the next 24 hours; Other: Participated in PETARDS in the past 90days.

Study Design

Total Participants: 1000
Study Start date:
October 01, 2022
Estimated Completion Date:
December 31, 2023

Study Description

Mortality is significantly higher in ARDS patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission.

ARDS patients admitted to the ICU typically receive multiple (as many as 10 or 20) treatments that work together to fight infection, reduce pulmonary exudation, improve oxygenation, and support systemic organ function. Clinicians are often willing to choose the exact or considered safe and effective regimen from the therapies mentioned above. Still, there are individual differences in ARDS patients, and it is difficult to confirm the optimal treatment plan. It is inevitable to choose treatment without evidence-based medicine based on experience. The primary purpose of this study was to help physicians select the best-effective approach among existing ARDS therapies, and secondly to provide a rationale for specific empirical or emerging ARDS treatments.

Clinical evidence to guide optimal management is best obtained from randomized controlled trials (RCTs); however, ARDS is a multi-causal, clinically and therapeutically heterogeneous clinical syndrome with rapid disease progression and complex clinical manifestations, in fact, difficult to organize RCT trials. In cases where the timing of onset and the pathophysiological mechanism cannot be determined, the initial treatment is the selection of protective ventilation/controlled infusion as the first-line standard therapy according to the Berlin classification of ARDS, and some second-line treatments with potential clinical benefit. It is difficult to conduct objective, scientific and timely evaluation, and the overall treatment plan is inevitably blind and empirical. This clinical operation mode is likely related to ARDS-related RCT research results. The results are unsatisfactory, the treatment response heterogeneity is high, and the outcome events vary greatly. closely related to the clinical status. The adaptive platform trial PETARDS is ideal for evaluating the effects of highly heterogeneous ARDS treatment strategies.

This clinical research design (adaptive platform trial, APT) can use the information of patients who are participating in the study to guide the clinical treatment of subsequent newly enrolled patients.

The APT trial randomized patients into multiple domains for multiple interventions to assess their effectiveness in different patients. The term "domain" refers to a common treatment unit (eg, steroid therapy) within which patients can be randomly assigned to several interventional (dose) groups (including controls, such as no steroids, as appropriate). Certainly). All trial procedures consist of a primary or "core" protocol and multiple secondary protocols, and the standard protocols, clinical treatment adaptations, and trial management and practices for specific treatment units are managed in a unified manner for each treatment unit. The core protocol, secondary protocols, and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) of this trial are presented in the appendix; the study required approval from the relevant ethics committees of all participating hospitals and was conducted by good clinical practice guidelines and principles described in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Connect with a study center

  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital

    Beijing,
    China

    Active - Recruiting

  • West China Hospital,Sichuan University

    Chengdu,
    China

    Active - Recruiting

  • Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

    Guangdong,
    China

    Active - Recruiting

  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University

    Harbin,
    China

    Active - Recruiting

  • Lanxi People's Hospital

    Lanxi,
    China

    Active - Recruiting

  • Ningbo First Hospital

    Ningbo,
    China

    Active - Recruiting

  • Zhognshang hospital, Fudan University

    Shanghai,
    China

    Active - Recruiting

  • Taizhou Hosptial of Zhejiang Province

    Taizhou,
    China

    Active - Recruiting

  • Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

    Wuhan,
    China

    Active - Recruiting

  • Wuhan University Renmin Hospital

    Wuhan,
    China

    Active - Recruiting

  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University

    Zhengzhou,
    China

    Active - Recruiting

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.