Given that childhood victimization leads to an increased vulnerability for subsequent
revictimization in adolescence, findings highlight a strong need for evidence-based
prevention programs targeting children with a history of child maltreatment as a high-risk
population of revictimization. However, evidence-based programs for foster parents that aim
to prevent revictimization of the child, while addressing the needs of the caregivers are
scarce. In order to develop and tailor such services to foster parents (and youth in care)
with maltreatment experiences, we developed a consumer-informed conceptual model in a prior
project (EMPOWERYOU SP3) that outlines the key mediators which may impact upon the risk of
revictimization and how we plan to address these with different intervention components.
Thus, in subproject 3 the conceptual model and the online-intervention components were
developed, involving the participants themselves as well as relevant stakeholders. The
usability of the online-intervention and the feasibility of the clinical trial (EMPOWERYOU
SP4) was piloted in subproject 3 (March 2021 - September 2021).
In subproject 4, we will conduct a factorial study to tear apart the main effects of each
intervention component on the mediator and outcome of interest, including potential
interaction effects. This will help optimizing the intervention approach. The full
online-intervention comprises five content modules and a coach, who is supporting the
caregiver with up to four phone-calls (50 minutes each) and short message service (SMS) or
e-mail reminders. Caregivers have two weeks to work through one module. Every caregiver will
receive the first two basic modules on parental self-care and child´s self-worth and
emotional regulation. This allows us to offer some level of support in all conditions
including the condition with the lowest component level across all factors.
Based on the MOST principles, this study will use a 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 full factorial design by
randomly allocating families with equal probability to one of 16 experimental conditions.
However, this factorial experiment does not represent a 16-arm randomized controlled trial
(RCT). The ultimate goal is to choose from a set of four intervention components with two
levels each (on/off) the one(s) that best reduce and prevent (re-)victimization. The
following intervention components have been selected (three content components, one
engagement/adherence component):
Component: "Watch out!" (on/off): Improving relationship-related risk detection and
self-protective behavior
Component: "You are safe here" (on/off): Improving relationship-related safety and
facilitating solid relationships
Component: "Who am I and where do I belong?" (on/off): Supporting the child constructing
an identity
Component: "My Coach" (on/off): Professional support of the caregiver in form of up to
four phone calls with a coach (i.e., one call per module 1&2 (combined), 3, 4, and 5).
The primary research objectives are:
To examine the efficacy of selected candidate components on primary outcome, the risk of
re-victimization, at follow-up (i.e., 3 months post intervention; approx. 24 weeks after
baseline)
To examine the efficacy of selected candidate components on secondary outcomes
(risk-taking behavior and functional behavior in relationships with caregiver, siblings,
peers, and others) at post-test (i.e., 1 week post intervention; approx. 12 weeks after
baseline)
The secondary objectives are:
To test enduring effects of selected components on secondary outcomes at 3-month
follow-up
To test mediating effects of theory-driven factors on the relationship between selected
components on secondary outcomes
To explore whether there are any interaction effects between components on primary or
secondary outcomes
To conduct exploratory analyses of potential moderators
Based on the conceptual model described above, this study will examine the following
hypotheses related to the main effects of intervention components:
Component "Watch out!" - Relationship-related risks: We hypothesize that receiving this
component will result in better detection of risk signals in relationships and less
risk-taking cognitions. This will lead to less relationship-related risk-taking behavior
which in turn will result in reductions of re-victimization experiences and others
secondary outcomes.
Component "You are safe here" - Relationship-related safety: We hypothesize that
receiving this component will result in better detection of safety signals in
relationships and more emotional security. This will lead to more functional
relationship behavior which in turn will result in reductions of (re-)victimization
experiences and other secondary outcomes.
Component "Who am I and where do I belong?" - Constructing identity: We hypothesize that
receiving this component will increase parental support in the child´s constructing of
identity. This will lead to a more positive self-appraisal and in turn to less
risk-taking and more functional relationship behavior, which in turn will result in
reductions of (re-)victimization experiences and other secondary outcomes.
Component "My Coach" - Professional support: We hypothesize that professional support
from a parent coach who is facilitating each component, will result in higher program
adherence/engagement which will yield larger intervention effects on primary and
secondary outcomes than without professional support.
We hypothesize that there will be an interaction effect between the relationship risk
and relationship safety components. When both components will be present, the effect
will be larger compared to only one of them present.
We hypothesize that there will be an interaction effect between each component and the
professional support component, such that with professional support, the effects of each
component will be larger than without professional support via greater
adherence/engagement of the caregiver.