Drug-Coated Balloon in Anticoagulated and Bleeding Risk Patients Undergoing PCI

Last updated: November 7, 2023
Sponsor: North Karelia Central Hospital
Overall Status: Active - Recruiting

Phase

N/A

Condition

Coronary Artery Disease

Chest Pain

Vascular Diseases

Treatment

Percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stent

Percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-coated balloon

Clinical Study ID

NCT04814212
DEBATE
  • Ages > 18
  • All Genders

Study Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare DCB with DES in stable CAD or ACS patients who are at high risk of bleeding. The hypothesis of the DEBATE trial is that the strategy using DCB and a shorter DAPT regimen is non-inferior to the treatment using DES and longer DAPT duration on patients with high bleeding risk. If non-inferiority is shown, the superiority of the DCB strategy over DES strategy will be tested.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Informed written consent
  • At least one major or two minor bleeding risk criteria of Academic Research Consortium (ARC) Major Criteria
  • Long-term oral anticoagulation
  • Severe or end stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular - filtrationrate [eGFR] <30 ml/min)
  • Hemoglobin <110 g/l
  • Spontaneous bleeding requiring hospitalization and transfusion in the past 6 months
  • Moderate to severe baseline thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100 x 10e9/L)
  • Chronic bleeding diathesis
  • Liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension
  • Active cancer in the past 12 months
  • Previous spontaneous ICH (at any time)
  • Previous traumatic ICH within the past 12 months
  • Presence of known brain arteriovenous malformation
  • Moderate to severe ischemic stroke within the past 6 months
  • Nondeferrable major surgery on dual antiplatelet therapy
  • Recent major surgery or trauma within 30 days before PCI Minor Criteria
  • Age >75 years
  • Moderate CKD (eGFR 30-59 ml/min)
  • Hemoglobin 110-129 g/l for men and 110-119 g/l for women
  • Spontaneous bleeding requiring hospitalization or transfusion within the past 12 -months not meeting major criterion
  • Long term use of oral nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs or steroids
  • Any ischemic stroke at any time not meeting major criterion Either of the following:
  1. Stabile angina or dyspnea and a coronary narrowing causing myocardial ischemiadetected in the angiogram. In stable patients prior PCI, the evidence of ischemia isneeded acquired either by perfusion imaging or by pressure wire measurement (FFR)during coronary angiography unless the coronary stenosis is > 90% in diameter.
  2. ACS (UAP or NSTEMI): symptoms of heart ischemia≥ 20 minutes and ≥ 0,5mm ST-depressionor transient ST-elevation or T-wave inversion at least in two adjacent leads and/or ahigh sensitivity troponin (hs-tnt) rise at least one unit above the 99. percentil orat least 50% rise in hs-tnt between two samples taken 1-3 hours apart. At least one of the following:
  • ≥1 de novo lesions in native coronary arteries or bypass vein grafts
  • Reference diameter of the vessel is 2.0-5.0mm'
  • Lesion length ≤ 40mm
  • Lesion or lesions are suitable for PCI

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to give written consent
  • STEMI
  • Reference diameter of the vessel is <2.0mm or >5.0 mm
  • Bifurcation lesion requiring the stenting of either of the branches afterpredilatation (TIMI<3 or significant recoil >30% in the main epicardial vessel: LAD,LCX or RCA) after predilatation)
  • Dissection affecting the flow (TIMI<3) or significant recoil (>30% in the mainepicardial vessel: LAD, LCX or RCA) after predilatation
  • in-stent restenosis
  • Chronic total occlusion
  • Life expectancy < 12 months
  • Cardiogenic shock at the arrival to the coronary angiography
  • Uncertainty about neurological recovery e.g. after resuscitation
  • Need for bypass surgery by heart team decision

Study Design

Total Participants: 546
Treatment Group(s): 2
Primary Treatment: Percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stent
Phase:
Study Start date:
September 01, 2022
Estimated Completion Date:
January 01, 2028

Study Description

Implantation of a drug-eluting stent (DES) has become a standard of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the last two decades. However there are still significant drawbacks in using DES as a permanent coronary implant. Most importantly, bleeding remains a significant complication of PCI, especially in elderly patients. The number of PCI patients having OAC:s is already significant, and will grow in the future, as the volume of PCIs in octogenarians increases, and so does the incidence of atrial fibrillation by age. After stenting at least one month lasting dual antiplatlet treatment (DAPT) is mandatory, and it cannot be safely terminated in case of a bleed. The optimal duration of DAPT on patients at bleeding risk is not known.

Balloon coated with paclitaxel and iopromide (drug-coated balloon, DCB) was originally developed for the treatment of in-stent restenosis, but later its potential for the treatment of de-novo coronary artery leasons has become clear in large registry trials. So far, the randomized controlled studies have shown the non-inferiority of PCI using DCB in comparison to DES in de novo leasons in small vessels. Also the non-inferiority of PCI using DCB in comparison to BMS was shown in the DEBUT trial in large vessels on patients at high bleeding risk. These results need to be confirmed in comparison of DCB to DES as the use of BMS is diminishing.

The hypothesis of the DEBATE trial is that the strategy using DCB and a shorter DAPT regimen is non-inferior to the treatment using DES and longer DAPT duration in the treatment of stable CAD or in ACS (UAP or NSTEMI) in patients on anticoagulation medication or otherwise on high bleeding risk. If non-inferiority is shown, the superiority of the DCB strategy over DES strategy will be tested.

Connect with a study center

  • Central Hospital of Central Finland

    Jyväskylä, Keski-Suomi 40620
    Finland

    Site Not Available

  • Central Hospital of Lapland

    Rovaniemi, Lappi 96400
    Finland

    Site Not Available

  • Kuopio University Hospital

    Kuopio, Pohjois-Savo 70210
    Finland

    Site Not Available

  • Helsinki University Hospital

    Helsinki, Uusimaa 00029
    Finland

    Site Not Available

  • Turku University Hospital

    Turku, Varsinais-Suomi 20521
    Finland

    Site Not Available

  • North Karelia Central Hospital

    Joensuu, 80210
    Finland

    Active - Recruiting

  • Central Hospital of Päijät-Häme

    Lahti,
    Finland

    Active - Recruiting

  • Oulu university hospital

    Oulu,
    Finland

    Site Not Available

  • Satakunta Central Hospital

    Pori,
    Finland

    Site Not Available

  • Tampere Heart Hospital

    Tampere,
    Finland

    Site Not Available

  • Centre Hospitalier La Rochelle

    La Rochelle,
    France

    Site Not Available

  • University Hospital of Carl Gustav Carus

    Dresden,
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • University Hospital of Saarland

    Homburg,
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Nhs Foundation Trust

    Norwich,
    United Kingdom

    Site Not Available

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.