Abused and neglected children are at extremely high lifetime risk of psychiatric disorder
placing a huge burden on health/social care services and society. Virtually all 92,000
children adopted or fostered in the UK have suffered abuse or neglect, therefore risking
profoundly negative outcomes in important areas of development including problematic
social relationships, academic underachievement and involvement in crime. These
disadvantages can lead to negative spirals of poor health and social inequality. Early
intervention can greatly improve their life chances, yet there are no adequate
psychosocial treatment strategies or care pathways to address the needs of maltreated
children. Psychiatric problems of maltreated children are characterised by complexity.
They have experienced extreme environmental risk and are at higher genetic risk than
peers. Many also struggle to develop and maintain healthy family relationships.
Neurodevelopmental disorders such as Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and
Autism often co-exist with disorders arising from the abuse and neglect such as Conduct
Disorder, Attachment Disorders and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) with devastating
consequences for lifelong mental health and development. To reflect this complexity,
research team uses the overarching term Maltreatment-Associated Psychiatric Problems
(MAPP).
The proposed project is a three-phase development and exploratory trial of Clinical and
cost-effectiveness of Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy (DDP) for abused and neglected
children with MAPP and their parents compared to Service as Usual (SAU). The data will be
collected in 3 phase trial, through a mixture of qualitative and quantitative methods.
Phase 1 Months 1-9 (9 months)
The first phase will focus on intervention and context optimisation that will take place
in 3 sites, each representing one of the UK DDP service delivery contexts: NHS, Social
Services and Private Practice. The research questions will be addressed through 24-36
qualitative interviews, and focus groups as well as review meetings at each site, with
practitioners and managers involved in delivery of DDP and SAU. The research team will
require input from the services practitioners and managers but also Young Peoples'
Advisory Groups (YPAG) and Patient, Public, Commissioner Involvement (PPCI) groups.
Phase 2 Months 10-26 (17 months)
To examine the research questions, and minimise bias, the proposed design is a
single-blind randomised controlled trial, with two-groups. The aim of this phase will be
to respond to research questions such as what are recruitment and retention rates over 6
months; are the trial assessments and interventions acceptable to parents and
professionals; are there functional data collection systems enabling future cost
effectiveness analysis. This phase will also assess fidelity to the DDP model and whether
the care pathways to CAMHS are maintained throughout.
The research team will aim to recruit around 60 families. The potential participants will
be identified and approached by their usual service provider. The usual service research
administrator will ensure eligible families receive the study participant information
leaflet to learn about the study. Once the interest of the family to take part in the
trial is confirmed, a research nurse will contact interested families 24 hours later, to
discuss the study further and seek consent. Families that confirm their willingness to
participate will be invited for two study visits one at baseline, shortly after joining
study and second visit after 12 months.
On completion of the baseline data collection, consenting families will be individually
randomised 1:1 to DDP or SAU, stratified by site. Individuals who consent to take part
will have an equal chance of being randomised to either group. One group will be included
in the DDP intervention. The second group will take part in the Services as Usual. The
research assistant with responsibility for collecting the data will not know which group
participants have been allocated to until the end of the study. The intervention will be
delivered by the participant's usual health care team.
Beside the randomised controlled trial, the data will be collected through qualitative
research activities to explore social context supporting/hindering child mental health,
optimising the contexts of, and processes for, DDP delivery.
Process evaluation
Qualitative work in phase 2 has three main aims:
To keep abreast of issues and themes uncovered in Phase 1 in the three feasibility
trial sites, to ensure ongoing compliance with guidelines for safe DDP delivery and
to explore the social context supporting/hindering child mental health in each site
including drivers and barriers to optimal DDP/SAU delivery. 6-10 interviews/focus
groups will be conducted with therapists, managers and families across the sites.
To explore the same topics from Phase 1 in the seven putative Phase 3 trial sites -
optimising the contexts of, and processes for, DDP delivery in those sites and
examining compliance with the DDP delivery guidelines established in Phase 1. 18-26
interviews/focus groups will be conducted across the sites.
To allow selection of 2-4 additional sites for Phase 3. The number of additional
sites required for Phase 3 will be decided based on Phase 2 conversion rates from
eligible to consented families and on statistical power considerations based on the
standard deviation, in Phase 2, of our principle outcome measure.
Phase 2 will also adopt case study methodology to focus more specifically on the impact
of DDP and SAU. The research team will learn through a more in-depth investigation
(individual interviews) about participant experience of DDP/SAU and of journeys through
service landscapes from the perspectives of the family, therapists, and other key
stakeholders involved in the treatment of and care pathways. A small selection of
families (2-3 families) will be invited to take part.
Phase 3 Months 27-53 (27 month RCT; (6 month analysis/write-up).
The third phase will continue as a single-blind individually randomised controlled
superiority definitive trial. The aim of this phase will be to examine the clinical and
cost-effectiveness of DDP for improving child mental health, compared to SAU. The
principle outcome will be child's mental health at 12 months post randomisation. The
research team will aim to recruit additional 180 families, including phase 2. The study
population, interventions, randomisation, data collection, measures, model fidelity and
procedures will be as described for Phase 2 unless findings from the process evaluation
suggest modifications.
Qualitative evaluation (process evaluation) will continue at the same intensity as Phase
2, with a similar number of interviews/focus groups (24-36 across all sites), to explore
delivery drivers/barriers in each service context. The case studies will continue,
involving a further 10-12 interviews, to track development over time. The PPCI group and
YPAG will have a crucial role in the Process Evaluation, during this phase, in reviewing
the qualitative findings with the Process Evaluation Team (PET) and considering how these
findings pragmatically feed into future service delivery. Whether or not DDP is
eventually found to be cost-effective over services as usual, the process evaluation will
yield important information about how mental health services can be safely delivered for
maltreated children in different services contexts (i.e. NHS CAMHS, Social Care and
Private Practice).