Multicentric Evaluation of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the XEN Implant Versus Classic Trabeculectomy in Open Angle Glaucoma Subjects

  • STATUS
    Recruiting
  • End date
    Dec 1, 2025
  • participants needed
    196
  • sponsor
    Prof. Dr. Herbert Reitsamer
Updated on 13 October 2022
corrected visual acuity
trabeculectomy
primary open angle glaucoma
pseudoexfoliation glaucoma

Summary

Multicentric evaluation of best corrected visual acuity of the XEN implant versus classic trabeculectomy in open angle glaucoma subjects

Description

The objective of this study is to evaluate the postoperative best corrected visual acuity and refraction in 2 different filtering glaucoma surgeries: XEN implant standalone procedure versus classic trabeculectomy standalone procedure. Both procedures are standard of care in surgical treatment of glaucoma. The XEN implant is a minimally invasive procedure and spares out the dissection of the conjunctiva, while the classic trabeculectomy is a procedure ab externo and supposed to be more invasive.

Up to 196 eyes will be enrolled in both surgery groups. Patients have to be legible for both procedures and are randomly allocated to both groups. Patients, who need a combined cataract procedure are not legible.

A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. Four study centers in Europe (Austria) will participate.

Patients with open angle glaucoma will be screened for eligibility, and informed consent will be obtained from those who meet screening criteria and are interested in participating in the study. Eligible patients will be examined preoperatively to obtain a medical history and to establish a baseline for the ocular condition. During screening it will be determined via randomization if the subject will be included in group 1 where the XEN implant will be implanted in a standalone procedure or in group 2 where the trabeculectomy will be performed in a standalone procedure. Regardless of study group, all eligible patients will have the same inclusion/exclusion criteria, effectiveness endpoints and follow up exams. An inclusion of both eyes of the same patient is not possible.

Postoperatively, subjects will undergo ophthalmic evaluations at regular intervals as specified in this protocol.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the postoperative best corrected distance and near visual acuity and refraction in 2 different filtering glaucoma surgeries: XEN Implant standalone procedure versus classic trabeculectomy standalone procedure.

The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with a best corrected distance visual acuity > 0.3 (logMAR) after 1 week.

Secondary objectives are the distance and near best corrected visual acuity measured at postoperative visits (e.g. day 1, month 1, 3, 12) and relative change of visual acuity at postoperative visits compared to baseline in both groups (e.g. month 1). The proportion of patients with a loss of best corrected distance visual acuity ≥ 2 lines at postoperative visits (e.g. day 1), the proportion of patients with a best corrected distance visual acuity (logMAR) > 0.3 and > 0.5 will be assessed at different postoperative visits (e.g. week 1, 2, month 1 and 3). Additionally, the time of recovery of visual acuity and the postoperative changes of refraction after the procedures will be compared. Secondary endpoints also include efficacy and safety of both procedures.

Subjects will undergo study visits at the following times: Preoperative Visit 1 (Screening), Operative Visit 2, 1 Day, 1 Week, 2 Weeks, 1 Month, 3, 6 Months, 12 Months Visit.

Details
Condition Primary Open Angle Glaucoma, Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma, Pigmentary Dispersion Glaucoma
Treatment Surgery
Clinical Study IdentifierNCT05439161
SponsorProf. Dr. Herbert Reitsamer
Last Modified on13 October 2022

Eligibility

Yes No Not Sure

Inclusion Criteria

Diagnosis of open angle glaucoma (Primary open angle glaucoma, Pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, Pigmentary dispersion glaucoma)
Clinically eligible for both surgeries (Trabeculectomy and XEN) on the discretion of the surgeon (area of healthy, free and mobile conjunctiva in the superior nasal target quadrant)
VA logMAR ≤ 1 (VA dec ≥ 0.1)
Trabecular meshwork must be visible (with Shaffer angle grade > 1 in the target quadrant)
Age 18 years or older
Patient understands the nature of the procedure, is willing to comply with associated follow-up evaluations, and provides written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

Clinical significant cataract
Subject has had prior cataract surgery in study eye ≤ 1 months (count to operation)
Subject has had prior (incisional) glaucoma surgery (XEN, trabeculectomy, viscocanalostomy, canaloplasty, shunts of any type, collagen implants, etc.). Prior iridotomy is acceptable
Phacic Angle Closure Glaucoma
Subject has neovascular, uveitic or angle recession glaucoma or any glaucoma associated with vascular disorders
Active inflammation (e.g., blepharitis, conjunctivitis, keratitis, uveitis)
Anterior chamber intraocular lens
Vitreous present in the anterior chamber
Presence of intraocular silicone oil
History of corneal surgery, corneal opacities, or corneal disease
Impaired episcleral venous drainage (e.g. Sturge-Weber or nanophthalmos)
History of dermatologic keloid formation
Active diabetic retinopathy, proliferative retinopathy, choroidal neovascularization, branch retinal vein occlusion, central retinal vein occlusion, or other ophthalmic disease or disorder that could confound study results
Known or suspected allergy or sensitivity to drugs required for the surgical procedure or any of the device components (e.g., porcine products or glutaraldehyde)
Pregnant or nursing women
Clear my responses

How to participate?

Step 1 Connect with a study center
What happens next?
  • You can expect the study team to contact you via email or phone in the next few days.
  • Sign up as volunteer  to help accelerate the development of new treatments and to get notified about similar trials.

You are contacting

Investigator Avatar

Primary Contact

site

Additional screening procedures may be conducted by the study team before you can be confirmed eligible to participate.

Learn more

If you are confirmed eligible after full screening, you will be required to understand and sign the informed consent if you decide to enroll in the study. Once enrolled you may be asked to make scheduled visits over a period of time.

Learn more

Complete your scheduled study participation activities and then you are done. You may receive summary of study results if provided by the sponsor.

Learn more

Similar trials to consider

Loading...

Browse trials for

Not finding what you're looking for?

Every year hundreds of thousands of volunteers step forward to participate in research. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.

Sign up as volunteer

user name

Added by • 

 • 

Private

Reply by • Private
Loading...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Ipsa vel nobis alias. Quae eveniet velit voluptate quo doloribus maxime et dicta in sequi, corporis quod. Ea, dolor eius? Dolore, vel!

  The passcode will expire in None.
Loading...

No annotations made yet

Add a private note
  • abc Select a piece of text from the left.
  • Add notes visible only to you.
  • Send it to people through a passcode protected link.
Add a private note