Diagnostic Errors in Anaphylactic Shock

  • STATUS
    Not Recruiting
  • End date
    Dec 31, 2022
  • participants needed
    270
  • sponsor
    University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Updated on 23 May 2022

Summary

Diagnostic accuracy and quality of management in anaphylactic shock is assessed in three conditions: expected, unexpected with no distractor, unexpected with distractor

Description

participants: physicians taking part in voluntary workshops. Participants are allocated to teams of three design: prospective, randomized, single-blind setting: simulated anaphylactic shock intervention: participants are allocated to 3 versions of the scenario: 1) expected, 2) unexpected but no distractor, 3) unexpected with distractor

Details
Condition Misdiagnosis
Treatment Diagnostic context
Clinical Study IdentifierNCT04825106
SponsorUniversity Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Last Modified on23 May 2022

Similar trials to consider

Loading...

Not finding what you're looking for?

Every year hundreds of thousands of volunteers step forward to participate in research. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.

Sign up as volunteer

user name

Added by • 

 • 

Private

Reply by • Private
Loading...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Ipsa vel nobis alias. Quae eveniet velit voluptate quo doloribus maxime et dicta in sequi, corporis quod. Ea, dolor eius? Dolore, vel!

  The passcode will expire in None.
Loading...

No annotations made yet

Add a private note
  • abc Select a piece of text from the left.
  • Add notes visible only to you.
  • Send it to people through a passcode protected link.
Add a private note