Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a serious complication in patients receiving antiresorptive therapies, such as Bisphosphonates and Denosumab. It is defined by the presence of exposed bone or a fistula that probes bone in the jaws for a period greater than 8 weeks in patient with a history of current or past antiresorptive or antiangiogenic treatment, and in the absence of prior radiotherapy or maxillary bone metastases. Depending on the severity of the disease 4 stages are described.
On the other hand, although the presence of alterations in the levels of certain biomarkers in saliva has been documented in patients with MRONJ compared to healthy patients, its applicability in clinical practice is still unknown.
Until recently, the status quo favored the adoption of a conservative strategy (non-surgical) for the initial management of patients with stage I and II. However, in recent years, this paradigm has been challenged by multiple authors who report better and more predictable outcomes with surgical treatment.
Based on the hypothesis that patients with MRONJ stage I and II subjected to initial surgical treatment have better results than those undergoing conservative (non-surgical) treatment, te research group has designed a unicentric, quasi-experimental clinical trial where the clinical and radiological outcome at the third month of 2 groups of patients with stages I and II MRONJ undergoing non-surgical treatment (Group 1 / control) versus initial surgical treatment (Group 2 / intervention) will be compared.
Also, the investigators hypothesize that the patients with complete resolution of the disease will also normalize salivary biomarkers levels unlike those with stable or progressive disease, meaning there is a correlation between clinical and biochemical response. Accordingly, the levels of specific salivary biomarkers at baseline and at the third month will be determined and compared with the clinical outcome.
After enrollment patients will be instructed and offered both treatment strategies, and assigned to the corresponding group according to their choice. Patients in group 1 (non-surgical) will receive traditional conservative treatment while patients undergoing surgical treatment will receive the same guidelines of conservative treatment plus surgery according to a specific surgical protocol.
2.1. Patients with MRONJ stage I and II subjected to initial surgical treatment have better results than those undergoing conservative (non-surgical) treatment.
2.2. There is a correlation between clinical and biochemical outcome and the detection in saliva of certain biomarkers such as Amino Terminal Crosslinked Telopeptides of Type 1 Collagen (NTX), Matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9), Interleukin 1a (IL-1a), Interleukin 1b (IL-1b), Interleukin 6 (IL-6), Interleukin 17 (IL-17) and Interleukin 36 (IL-36) may be useful to monitor treatment response.
3. Main Objectives:
3.1. To compare the clinical and radiological outcome after 3 months of conservative treatment versus initial surgical treatment in patients with MRONJ stage I and II.
3.2. To determine the levels of salivary biomarkers at the beginning and after 3 months of treatment while correlating them with the clinical outcome.
4. Secondary Aims
5.2. Main Variables
5.3. Secondary Variables 5.3.1. Both groups
5.3.2. Group 1 (Conservative medical treatment)
5.3.3. Group 2 (Surgical treatment)
5.4. Inclusion Visit
5.4.1 STANDARD PROTOCOL FOR CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT (applicable to both groups)
5.4.2. SPECIFIC PROTOCOL FOR SURGICAL TREATMENT
5.4.3. SALIVA COLLECTION PROTOCOL
5.4.4. SUCCESSIVE VISITS
5.4.5. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Normality tests and graphs will be used to determine if the variables follow a normal distribution. Variables with normal distribution are expressed as mean standard deviation and those without normal distribution are expressed as median and interquartile range. To evaluate the differences between groups, the student's t test or the Mann-Whitney U test will be used for quantitative variables; and the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for qualitative variables.
The correlations will be examined by the Spearman or Pearson rank correlation. Paired or related sample tests will be used to assess intragroup differences. A value of p <0.05 will be considered an indicator of a significant difference.
Condition | Osteonecrosis of the Jaw, Bisphosphonate Induced, Osteonecrosis of the Jaw, Bisphosphonate Related, Osteonecrosis of the Jaw, Bisphosphonate Induced, Osteonecrosis of the Jaw, Bisphosphonate Related |
---|---|
Treatment | Surgical treatment |
Clinical Study Identifier | NCT04584840 |
Sponsor | Fundació d'investigació Sanitària de les Illes Balears |
Last Modified on | 24 February 2021 |
,
You have contacted , on
Your message has been sent to the study team at ,
You are contacting
Primary Contact
Additional screening procedures may be conducted by the study team before you can be confirmed eligible to participate.
Learn moreIf you are confirmed eligible after full screening, you will be required to understand and sign the informed consent if you decide to enroll in the study. Once enrolled you may be asked to make scheduled visits over a period of time.
Learn moreComplete your scheduled study participation activities and then you are done. You may receive summary of study results if provided by the sponsor.
Learn moreEvery year hundreds of thousands of volunteers step forward to participate in research. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.
Sign up as volunteer
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Ipsa vel nobis alias. Quae eveniet velit voluptate quo doloribus maxime et dicta in sequi, corporis quod. Ea, dolor eius? Dolore, vel!
No annotations made yet
Congrats! You have your own personal workspace now.