Impact of clinical guidance & point-of-care CRP test in children: the ARON project Trial Design: multicentre, cluster-randomized, parallel group pragmatic trial Trial Participants and setting: Children aged 6 months to 12 years of age with an acute illness episode presenting to in-hours general practice or out-of-hospital community paediatrics offices
Intervention(s) Diagnostic algorithm:
*safety netting advice:
Control: Diagnosis and Treatment/Management as per usual care:
Primary Endpoint: Antibiotic prescribing rate at index consultation
Secondary Endpoint(s)
Exploratory endpoints at the index consultation:
During a follow-up period (day 1 to day 30):
Planned Sample Size: 6111 Timing of the intervention: Intervention at index consultation (at presentation to primary care) Follow-up duration: 30 days follow-up Duration of the trial (FPI-CSR): 33 months
The investigators aim to strengthen the assessment of acutely ill children in primary care, by introducing a diagnostic algorithm that can decrease antibiotic prescribing.
In light of the prior evidence and its results so far, the ARON trial will test the impact of a diagnostic algorithm including a standardised clinical assessment, a POC CRP test, and safety netting advice.
Therefore, the investigators propose to assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a diagnostic algorithm which includes a decision tree, POC CRP and safety netting advice in acutely ill children aged 6 months to 12 years of age presenting to ambulatory care, on AB prescribing, referral/admission to hospital, additional testing, mortality, and patient satisfaction.
More specifically, the investigators' research question is whether this diagnostic algorithm is able to safely reduce antibiotic prescribing in acutely ill children presenting to ambulatory care.
The decision whether or not to conduct a POC CRP test will depend on the standardized clinical assessment, i.e. a validated clinical decision tree, and subsequently for low-risk children on the intention to prescribe AB.
The investigators will provide clear evidence-based guidance on how to interpret the CRP test result as outlined below.
A process evaluation will examine how clinicians use CRP testing in their practice and how parents experience these consultations.
The investigators propose a study, where children (6 months to 12 years of age) will be randomised to (a) a diagnostic algorithm with CRP testing and specific guidance on when to prescribe AB or (b) usual care. CRP testing will be done using a finger prick test (result within 4 minutes). The CRP level will then be given to the clinician who will communicate the result to the child/parents.
The investigators aim to recruit 6111 children and will collect data registered by the participating physician, from the child's health record and children/parents directly. The investigators will describe how the intervention has worked in practice and how clinicians/parents have experienced these consultations.
Guidance will be part of a diagnostic algorithm which includes clinically guided POC CRP testing and safety netting advice to inform parents on what to expect and what to look out for.
Individual interviews will be conducted with clinicians and parents taking part in the trial within 30 days after the first contact consultation, to explore the social processes influencing embedding of the intervention within practice, and behaviour change techniques.
These individual telephone interviews will be performed with a selection of parents to address whether their concerns were discussed appropriately and whether their expectations were met and how they experienced the consultation and/or POC CRP testing.
The safety-netting advice will be supported by a parent information booklet, based on previous research (the "When should I worry"-interactive booklet (a guide to Coughs, Colds, Earache & Sore Throats), the "Mijn kind heeft koorts" booklet (Eefje de Bont, www.thuisarts.nl), and the "Caring for children with coughs"-leaflet (information about how to look after a child who has a cough and when to see the doctor)).
The findings of this study could change the practice of ambulatory care physicians and might be of great interest to parents and childcare providers. The investigators will publish the findings of this research in academic journals, present at national conferences and discuss results with groups responsible for the national guidance on how to assess acutely ill children (Domus Medica, SSMG).
Condition | Infection |
---|---|
Treatment | Diagnostic algorithm |
Clinical Study Identifier | NCT04470518 |
Sponsor | KU Leuven |
Last Modified on | 16 August 2021 |
,
You have contacted , on
Your message has been sent to the study team at ,
You are contacting
Primary Contact
Additional screening procedures may be conducted by the study team before you can be confirmed eligible to participate.
Learn moreIf you are confirmed eligible after full screening, you will be required to understand and sign the informed consent if you decide to enroll in the study. Once enrolled you may be asked to make scheduled visits over a period of time.
Learn moreComplete your scheduled study participation activities and then you are done. You may receive summary of study results if provided by the sponsor.
Learn moreEvery year hundreds of thousands of volunteers step forward to participate in research. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.
Sign up as volunteer
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Ipsa vel nobis alias. Quae eveniet velit voluptate quo doloribus maxime et dicta in sequi, corporis quod. Ea, dolor eius? Dolore, vel!
No annotations made yet
Congrats! You have your own personal workspace now.