Effect of BPA on Anchor Antibiotic Continuity in the ED: Randomized Controlled Trial
-
- STATUS
- Recruiting
-
- days left to enroll
- 74
-
- participants needed
- 500
-
- sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
Summary
The objective is to compare the timeliness of anchor antibiotic administration in the emergency department (ED) after initial dosing with and without a Best Practice Alert in Epic (BPA) implemented to remind physicians to re-order the antibiotic.
We hypothesize that post-BPA implementation, physicians will have a higher rate of ordering subsequent doses of antibiotics on-time and with the correct dosages compared to pre-BPA implementation.
Description
Antibiotics administration can sometimes be delayed in the emergency department (ED) environment, where antibiotics are frequently ordered in electronic medical record systems as a one-time dose and the second dose is delayed or missed. This has been described in the literature, a 2017 article in Critical Care Medicine noted in a single academic center that 33% of sepsis cases had 2nd-dose-antibiotic delays greater than 25% of the recommend interval and this was associated with significantly increased hospital mortality (OR 1.61) and mechanical ventilation (OR 2.44).
An Epic Best Practice Advisory (BPA) was created by the Mass General Brigham eCare Decision Support team to address this patient safety concern. The BPA alerts providers in the ED or ED Observation when the next dose of broad-spectrum antibiotic dose is due for a patient if no future administration has been ordered, based on patient characteristics (such as renal function) and antibiotic selection. The objective of this study is to analyze the impact of this BPA on our performance in terms of on-time antibiotics through a randomized controlled trial. Patients whose medical record number (MRN) are odd will be assigned to the treatment group, while those whose MRNs are even will be assigned to the control group. The BPA will only be displayed to the patient's providers for the treatment group. We will then compare the performance of on-time antibiotics between the groups and the resulting impact on patient outcomes, such as overall hospital length of stay, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), and in-hospital mortality.
Details
| Condition | Bacterial Infection, Bacterial Infections, Septicemia, Sepsis and Septicemia, Sepsis and Septicemia, Bacterial Infections, systemic infection, systemic infections, sepsis, sepsis syndrome, Alert Fatigue, Health Personnel, Alert Fatigue, Health Personnel |
|---|---|
| Treatment | Epic Best Practice Alert |
| Clinical Study Identifier | NCT04620486 |
| Sponsor | Massachusetts General Hospital |
| Last Modified on | 27 January 2021 |
How to participate?
,
You have contacted , on
Your message has been sent to the study team at ,
What happens next?
- You can expect the study team to contact you via email or phone in the next few days.
- Sign up as volunteer to help accelerate the development of new treatments and to get notified about similar trials.
You are contacting
Primary Contact
Additional screening procedures may be conducted by the study team before you can be confirmed eligible to participate.
Learn moreIf you are confirmed eligible after full screening, you will be required to understand and sign the informed consent if you decide to enroll in the study. Once enrolled you may be asked to make scheduled visits over a period of time.
Learn moreComplete your scheduled study participation activities and then you are done. You may receive summary of study results if provided by the sponsor.
Learn moreSimilar trials to consider
Not finding what you're looking for?
Sign up as a volunteer to stay informed
Every year hundreds of thousands of volunteers step forward to participate in research. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.
Sign up as volunteer