CCCG Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 2017 Study in Children

  • STATUS
    Recruiting
  • End date
    Aug 31, 2024
  • participants needed
    100
  • sponsor
    Chinese University of Hong Kong
Updated on 26 February 2021

Summary

Relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) has a poorer outcome than newly diagnosed ALL patients with only about 40% overall survival after re-treatment. The study CCCG Relapsed ALL 2017 study will adopt the UK R3 study stratification and treatment backbone with two new agents added. There will be a 4-week induction, followed by two consolidation courses. High-risk patients will receive allogeneic stem cell transplant. While intermediate and standard risk groups will continue maintenance treatment for another 2 years or one year. New agents will be added aiming at improving survival outcome.

  1. Study of adding anti-CD20 antibody (rituximab) with chemotherapy: CD20 is found to be expressed in 40-50% of B-lineage ALL, and rituximab has been studied in adult ALL with superior survival (75% vs 47%,). There is little experience of using rituximab in pediatric ALL thus a CCCG Relapsed ALL 2017 Study will perform the study assessing the remission rate and MRD response of CD20+ ALL treated with rituximab. Six doses of rituximab and will be monitored the week 5 MRD and relapse rate as study outcome.

(This arm was terminated in October 2020 after interim analysis showing lack of efficacy)

2. Adding bortezomid during the induction: The very early or early bone marrow relapse has low remission rate. Previous case studies showed that Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, may achieve remission in refractory ALL, 80% remission in B-ALL with combination of chemotherapy and bortezomib. Thus adding bortezomib, may improve the remission rate, thus bridging to allogeneic stem cell transplant. Adding bortezomib in the relapsed chemotherapy protocol may increase the toxicity and even treatment related mortality. In this protocol, we suggested to add during the induction therapy.

Description

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) is now having over 80% event-free survival after frontline chemotherapy treatment. There is still 15-20% of patients having a relapse after initial control. Relapsed ALL is associated with lower second remission rate and also high chance of further relapse. Currently there are only a few large scale studies targeting this challenging disease. BFM Relapsed ALL studies have been organized since 1990s and have identified several important prognostic factors, including timing and site of relapse and also immunophenotyping. COG has performed several studies on relapsed ALL (AALL02P2, AALL0433, ADVL04P2) but the results are rather fragmented. Recently UK group conducted a nationwide randomized study, ALL R3 study, testing the type of anthracycline and prognostic value of minimal residual disease after induction therapy.

T-ALL relapse is having poor prognosis except for the late isolated extramedullary relapse. Long-term survival of T-ALL bone marrow relapse treated with chemotherapy is less than 10%, thus allogeneic stem cell transplant is always indicated. Whereas B-ALL has been better studied and the risk stratification of relapsed ALL is better defined.

According to previous studies, patients can be stratified into Standard, Intermediate and High-Risk groups based on site of relapse, time of relapse from first diagnosis and immunophenotyping. Early bone marrow relapse at less than 18-36 months from diagnosis is having the worst prognosis and is classified as HR. Those with late relapse at >36 months from diagnosis is in general having a better prognosis. Bone marrow relapse is having a poorer outcome as compared to isolated extramedullary relapse (IEM). Somehow combined marrow and extramedullary relapse appear to have a better prognosis than isolated bone marrow relapse. Early B-ALL marrow relapse was only having 15-30% long-term survival, and early B-ALL IEM around 30-50% survival.

Late B-ALL marrow relapse has a higher second remission rate of around 95% and also better long term survival of 50-60%. Late B-ALL IEM is having a better prognosis of up to 70-80% survival. Based on the above criteria, several study groups including BFM, UK and COG also adopted similar strategies of stratifying patients and delivered risk-adapted treatment, with some minor variation among these groups.

Details
Condition Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, in Relapse, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, in Relapse, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, in Relapse, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, in Relapse
Treatment bortezomib injection, RiTUXimab Injection
Clinical Study IdentifierNCT04224571
SponsorChinese University of Hong Kong
Last Modified on26 February 2021

Eligibility

Yes No Not Sure

Inclusion Criteria

Age at relapse less than 21 years and the age at initial diagnosis of ALL of Pre-B or T-lineage less than 18 years
Confirmed diagnosis of relapse of leukemia according to definition as below
Definitions of Relapse
RELAPSE: Any recurrence of disease whether in marrow or extramedullary
(1) ISOLATED Bone Marrow Relapse: Patients with an M3 marrow (>25% blast) at any point after achieving remission without involvement of the CNS and/or testicles and/or other extramedullary sites. Relapsed should be confirmed by morphology, flow cytometry, FISH and/or cytogenetics. M2 marrow should have a repeat of bone marrow in 1-2 weeks to confirm M3 status unless the original cytogenetic clone reappears
(2) CNS Relapse: Positive cytomorphology and WBC 5/L OR clinical signs of CNS
leukemia such as facial nerve palsy, brain/eye involvement, or hypothalamic
syndrome that are compatible with recurrent CNS leukemia than to alternative
causes (e.g., viral infection with facial nerve palsy or chemotherapy
toxicity). If any CSF evaluation shows positive cytomorphology and WBC < 5/L
a second CSF evaluation is recommended within 2 - 4 weeks. While
identification of a leukemic clone in CSF by flow cytometry (TdT, CD19, CD10
etc.) or FISH for diagnostic karyotypic abnormality may be useful, definitive
evidence of CNS involvement (i.e. WBC 5/L OR clinical signs of CNS leukemia)
is required for the diagnosis of a CNS relapse
(3) TESTICULAR Relapse: Must be documented by testicular biopsy, if not
associated with a marrow relapse
(4) ISOLATED Extramedullary (IEM) relapse: CNS and/or testicular relapse
and/or other extramedullary sites such as skin with an M1 marrow. The presence
of MRD in the bone marrow does NOT exclude IEM
(5) COMBINED Relapse: M2 or M3 marrow at any time after achieving remission
with concomitant CNS and/or testicular relapse
CNS Status
CNS 1: In cerebral spinal fluid (CSF), absence of blasts on cytospin
preparation, regardless of the number of white blood cells (WBCs)
CNS 2: In CSF, presence < 5/L WBCs and cytospin positive for blasts, or 5/L
WBCs but negative by Steinherz/Bleyer algorithm
CNS 2a: < 10/L RBCs; < 5/L WBCs and cytospin positive for blasts; CNS 2b: 10/L
RBCs; < 5/L WBCs and cytospin positive for blasts; and CNS 2c: 10/L RBCs; 5/L
WBCs and cytospin positive for blasts but negative by Steinherz/Bleyer
algorithm (see below)
CNS3: In CSF, presence of 5/L WBCs and cytospin positive for blasts and/or
clinical signs of CNS leukemia
CNS 3a: < 10/L RBCs; 5/L WBCs and cytospin positive for blasts; CNS 3b: 10/L
RBCs, 5/L WBCs and positive by Steinherz/Bleyer algorithm (see below); CNS 3c
Clinical signs of CNS leukemia (such as facial nerve palsy, brain/eye
involvement or hypothalamic syndrome)
Method of Evaluating Initial Traumatic Lumbar Punctures
If the patient has leukemic cells in the peripheral blood and the lumbar
puncture is traumatic and contains 5 WBC/L and blasts, the following algorithm
should be used to distinguish between CNS 2 and CNS 3 disease: CSF WBC > 2X
Blood WBC CSF RBC Blood RBC

Exclusion Criteria

Mature B ALL
Poor Karnosky score
Clear my responses

How to participate?

Step 1 Connect with a study center
What happens next?
  • You can expect the study team to contact you via email or phone in the next few days.
  • Sign up as volunteer to help accelerate the development of new treatments and to get notified about similar trials.

You are contacting

Investigator Avatar

Primary Contact

site

0/250

Additional screening procedures may be conducted by the study team before you can be confirmed eligible to participate.

Learn more

If you are confirmed eligible after full screening, you will be required to understand and sign the informed consent if you decide to enroll in the study. Once enrolled you may be asked to make scheduled visits over a period of time.

Learn more

Complete your scheduled study participation activities and then you are done. You may receive summary of study results if provided by the sponsor.

Learn more

Similar trials to consider

Loading...

Not finding what you're looking for?

Every year hundreds of thousands of volunteers step forward to participate in research. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.

Sign up as volunteer

user name

Added by • 

 • 

Private

Reply by • Private
Loading...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Ipsa vel nobis alias. Quae eveniet velit voluptate quo doloribus maxime et dicta in sequi, corporis quod. Ea, dolor eius? Dolore, vel!

  The passcode will expire in None.
Loading...

No annotations made yet

Add a private note
  • abc Select a piece of text from the left.
  • Add notes visible only to you.
  • Send it to people through a passcode protected link.
Add a private note