Comparison of Medical Results of Testicular Sperm Extraction by Conventional Surgery and Microsurgical Track

  • STATUS
    Recruiting
  • End date
    Jul 26, 2022
  • participants needed
    220
  • sponsor
    University Hospital, Toulouse
Updated on 26 January 2021

Summary

To compare motile sperm extraction rate between microTESE and conventional TESE in 18-50 years-old men with non obstructive azoospermia.

Description

About one in ten couples cannot have children without medical assistance. Male factors for infertility are identified in half cases with 10% azoospermia, non-obstructive in most cases. Up to date, testis surgical sperm retrieval for use in ICSI-IVF is the only possibility for those men to have children with their own sperm. Several options are available for surgically retrieving sperm from testis: During conventional testicular sperm extraction (cTESE), the testis is exposed through a small incision, then 1 or more biopsies are randomly made. Up to date, cTESE is considered as the gold-standard for sperm extraction in this population.

However, the success of surgical sperm extraction concerns a man out of two having cTESE for non-obstructive azoospermia.

On the other hand, Schlegel showed in 1997 that cTESE induces a significative loss of testicular tissue with possible impact on male endocrine balance with occurence of hematomas, inflammatory reshuffles and ischaemic lesions, compromising some regions in the testicular parenchyme. Another option for surgical sperm extraction is micro-surgery called microTESE (or TESE). It consists in examining the testicular parenchyme under a high-power microscope (up to 25 magnification), screening for white opaque tubules with higher diameter which indicates possible active spermatogenesis. The benefits of TESE are: (1) a better identification of sites of sperm production in the testis, (2) a better preservation of testicular vasculature decreasing the risk of postoperative hematoma or tissue ischemia and (3) excision of 3 to 10 times less tissue.

Nevertheless, no randomized studies have compared both techniques to validate such an assumption. In 2014, the results of a meta-analysis performed by Deruyver showed that, among the 7 original articles comparing cTESE to TESE, 3 were retrospective studies and the remaining 4 prospective studies were not randomized.

It is highly unlikely that this better outcome is related to patient selection. Nevertheless, the relatively small number of studies comparing both methods makes it difficult to draw definitive conclusions This study is based on the hypothesis that TESE is a superior technique than cTESE with a difference of 20% like observed in Deruyver's meta-analysis.

The principal objective is to compare motile sperm extraction rate between TESE and cTESE in 18-50 years-old men with NOA.

Details
Condition Azoospermia
Treatment conventional TESE, Micro TESE
Clinical Study IdentifierNCT02773498
SponsorUniversity Hospital, Toulouse
Last Modified on26 January 2021

Eligibility

Yes No Not Sure

Inclusion Criteria

Is your age between 18 yrs and 50 yrs?
Are you male?
Do you have Azoospermia?
Do you have any of these conditions: Do you have Azoospermia??
Do you have any of these conditions: Do you have Azoospermia??
consecutive spermograms (with 3 months interval) confirming absence of sperm (azoospermia)
diagnosis of non-obstructive azoospermia on the basis of a complete history, physical examination, endocrine profile, ultrasound and chromosomal analysis

Exclusion Criteria

History of previous testicular surgery, except orchiopexy for undescended testis
Monochordy
Ultrasound revealed testicular nodule
Y chromosome microdeletions type AZFa and b
Clear my responses

How to participate?

Step 1 Connect with a site
What happens next?
  • You can expect the study team to contact you via email or phone in the next few days.
  • Sign up as volunteer to help accelerate the development of new treatments and to get notified about similar trials.

You are contacting

Investigator Avatar
Name

Primary Contact

site
Name

Phone Email

0/250
Please verify that you are not a bot.

Additional screening procedures may be conducted by the study team before you can be confirmed eligible to participate.

Learn more

If you are confirmed eligible after full screening, you will be required to understand and sign the informed consent if you decide to enroll in the study. Once enrolled you may be asked to make scheduled visits over a period of time.

Learn more

Complete your scheduled study participation activities and then you are done. You may receive summary of study results if provided by the sponsor.

Learn more

Similar trials to consider

Loading...

Not finding what you're looking for?

Every year hundreds of thousands of volunteers step forward to participate in research. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.

Sign up as volunteer

user name

Added by • 

 • 

Private

Reply by • Private
Loading...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Ipsa vel nobis alias. Quae eveniet velit voluptate quo doloribus maxime et dicta in sequi, corporis quod. Ea, dolor eius? Dolore, vel!

  The passcode will expire in None.
Loading...

No annotations made yet

Add a private note
  • abc Select a piece of text from the left.
  • Add notes visible only to you.
  • Send it to people through a passcode protected link.
Add a private note