Last updated on June 2019

Radical Versus Simple Hysterectomy and Pelvic Node Dissection in Patients With Low-risk Early Stage Cervical Cancer (SHAPE)


Brief description of study

The reason this study is being done is to see if a simple hysterectomy is as good as a radical hysterectomy in preventing cancer of the cervix from returning, and whether, because less tissue surrounding the uterus is removed during surgery, there are fewer side-effects after the surgery and in the long-term.

Detailed Study Description

At this time, it is not clear which of these approaches best balances the desire to prevent cancer of the cervix from returning with the risks of side effects after surgery and in the long-term.

Clinical Study Identifier: NCT01658930

Find a site near you

Start Over

LKH Leoben

Leoben, Austria
  Connect »

LKH Salzburg

Salzburg, Austria
  Connect »

UZ Leuven

Leuven, Belgium
  Connect »

CHU Amiens

Amiens, France
  Connect »

CHU de Clermont-Ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, France
  Connect »

CHU Limoges

Limoges, France
  Connect »

ICO - Rene Gauducheau

Saint-Herblain, France
  Connect »

LUMC

Leiden, Netherlands
  Connect »

Erasmus MC

Rotterdam, Netherlands
  Connect »

Southend University Hospital

Westcliff-on-Sea, United Kingdom
  Connect »

Queen Alexandra Hospital

Portsmouth, United Kingdom
  Connect »

Recruitment Status: Open


Brief Description Eligibility Contact Research Team


Receive Emails About New Clinical Trials!

Sign up for our FREE service to receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.