• SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Patient Resources
    • Clinical Trial Listings
    • What is Clinical Research?
    • Volunteering for a Clinical Trial
    • Understanding Informed Consent
    • Useful Resources
    • FDA Approved Drugs
  • Professional Resources
    • Research Center Profiles
    • Market Research
    • Benchmark Reports
    • FDA Approved Drugs
    • Training Guides
    • Books
    • eLearning
    • Events
    • Newsletters
    • White Papers
    • SOPs
  • White Papers
  • Clinical Trial Listings
  • Advertise
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » FDA Warns PI for Eligibility Criteria, Study Drug Administration Issues

FDA Warns PI for Eligibility Criteria, Study Drug Administration Issues

August 28, 2023

Failures to adhere to trial eligibility criteria and protocol requirements for investigational drug administration have netted a Pennsylvania-based investigator an FDA warning letter.

The warning letter, issued to rheumatologist Angela Stupi and posted online on Aug. 22, outlines a number of problems observed during the agency’s September 2022 inspection of her Cranberry Township, Penn., site, Advanced Rheumatology and Arthritis Wellness Center, where two trial protocols were assessed.

The three violations laid out in the warning letter fall under “a failure to ensure that the investigation was conducted according to the investigational plan.” The first relates to adherence to inclusion criteria.

Specifically, a participant was enrolled in the trial without having a stimulated whole salivary flow rate greater than 0.1 mL/min as required by the protocol’s eligibility criteria. Despite having no salivary flow rate measured at screening or baseline, the participant was randomized and given multiple doses of the investigational drug over six study visits, the letter says.

In Stupi’s written response, she explains that the sponsor removed the inclusion criterion through a protocol amendment and asked her to make a note to file (NTF) stating the screening lab results, physical exam and detailed conversation with the patient resulted in a score that met inclusion criteria.

Despite her claims, the FDA’s investigation revealed that the sponsor had not in fact nixed the eligibility criterion. “In fact, all versions of the protocol required a stimulated whole salivary flow rate >0.1 mL/min,” the agency said.

Another failure occurred when two patients were enrolled and randomized into a trial without having diagnoses of a moderate-to-severe condition with prior documented radiologic evidence.

“While we acknowledge your clinical assessment that [the patients] appeared to have met the clinical criteria for [the condition], your response is inadequate because you did not obtain or subsequently provide radiologic evidence (X-ray or radiologist’s report) to show that these subjects met the radiological criterion,” the FDA said. “Your failure to exclude subjects who did not have radiologic evidence of [the condition], as required by the protocol, raises concerns about the integrity of the data collected at your study site, and jeopardizes the rights, safety, and welfare of subjects.”

The final issue listed in the warning letter pertains to failures to properly administer the investigational drug as dictated by the protocol. Specifically, although the investigational drug was supposed to be injected in the thighs, upper arms or abdomens, two participants received injections to their forearms during multiple study visits.

The FDA judged Stupi’s response to the inspection observations inadequate because it did not provide sufficient information on planned corrective and preventive actions. The agency asked Stupi to provide additional information within 15 business days.

Read the warning letter here: https://tinyurl.com/yuen64n9.

    Upcoming Events

    • 16Oct

      MAGI@home Clinical Research Conference 2023

    • 25Oct

      2023 WCG Patient Forum

    • 26Oct

      FDA in 2024: What to Expect in an Election Year

    Featured Products

    • Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection

      Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection: Resources for Investigators, Sponsors, CROs and IRBs

    • Best Practices for Clinical Trial Site Management

      Best Practices for Clinical Trial Site Management

    Featured Stories

    • Donna Snyder

      New WCG Executive Physician Outlines Goals for Clinical Research

    • Hand Shake at Meeting

      Partnership to Bolster Trials in Low Resource Regions Kicks Off

    • Guidelines-360x240.png

      Major Industry Groups Offer Feedback on ICH’s E6(R3) Guidelines

    • AsktheExpertsBadge-360x240.png

      Ask the Experts: Monitoring

    Standard Operating Procedures for Risk-Based Monitoring of Clinical Trials

    The information you need to adapt your monitoring plan to changing times.

    Learn More Here
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell or Share My Data

    Footer Logo

    300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

    Phone 703.538.7600 – Toll free 888.838.5578

    Copyright © 2023. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing