• SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Patient Resources
    • COVID-19 Patient Resource Center
    • Clinical Trial Listings
    • What is Clinical Research?
    • Volunteering for a Clinical Trial
    • Understanding Informed Consent
    • Useful Resources
    • FDA Approved Drugs
  • Professional Resources
    • Research Center Profiles
    • Market Research
    • FDA Approved Drugs
    • Training Guides
    • Books
    • eLearning
    • Events
    • Newsletters
    • White Papers
    • SOPs
    • eCFR and Guidances
  • White Papers
  • Clinical Trial Listings
  • Advertise
  • COVID-19
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » Dermatology Trials Still Lack Diversity Despite Decade of Inclusion Efforts

Dermatology Trials Still Lack Diversity Despite Decade of Inclusion Efforts

March 7, 2022

Dermatology trials still don’t reflect the ethnic, racial and gender makeup of the U.S. after more than 10 years of efforts to improve their diversity, a new study shows.

In an analysis of 392 randomized dermatology trials published in JAMA Dermatology, researchers from the University of Miami School of Medicine found that 38.1 percent of reporting trials from 2015 to 2020 had at least 20 percent nonWhite participants, the same figure seen in findings from an earlier analysis of dermatology trials between 2010 and 2015.

The trials, which covered the common conditions of alopecia areata, acne, atopic dermatitis, lichen planus, psoriasis and vitiligo, were deemed unrepresentative of race and ethnicity if they had fewer than 20 percent ethnically/racially diverse participants and unrepresentative of sex if they included fewer than 45 percent women, criteria in line with U.S. Census data, the researchers said.

Psoriasis trials were seen to be the least diverse, with only 12.1 percent of trials reporting at least 20 percent minority participants and only 29.5 percent of trials having at least 45 percent female participants.

Access the study findings here: https://bit.ly/3vw5Hfx.

 

To view more CenterWatch Weekly stories, click here.

Upcoming Events

  • 12Apr

    The Participant Playbook Webinar Series, Part 3 — Rethinking the Development of Participant-Centric Clinical Trial Technology

  • 25Apr

    Effective Root Cause Analysis and CAPA Investigations for Drugs, Devices and Clinical Trials

  • 26Apr

    FDA’s New Laws and Regulations: What Drug and Biologics Manufacturers Need to Know

  • 27Apr

    Califf’s FDA, 2023 and Beyond: Key Developments, Insights and Analysis

  • 17May

    2023 WCG Avoca Quality Consortium Summit

  • 21May

    WCG MAGI Clinical Research Conference – 2023 East

Featured Products

  • Spreadsheet Validation: Tools and Techniques to Make Data in Excel Compliant

    Spreadsheet Validation: Tools and Techniques to Make Data in Excel Compliant

  • Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection

    Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection: Resources for Investigators, Sponsors, CROs and IRBs

Featured Stories

  • Five Ws

    Consider the Five ‘W’s to Understand Potential Participants

  • QandA-360x240.png

    Perspectives from Smaller-Sized CROs: Q&A with Cheryle Evans

  • White House

    Trial Stakeholders Advise White House on Emergency Research Infrastructure

  • SurveywBlueBackground-360x240.png

    Stress Levels Continue to Climb in Healthcare Workforce, Survey Finds

Standard Operating Procedures for Risk-Based Monitoring of Clinical Trials

The information you need to adapt your monitoring plan to changing times.

Learn More Here
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Data

Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 617.948.5100 – Toll free 866.219.3440

Copyright © 2023. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing