• SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Patient Resources
    • COVID-19 Patient Resource Center
    • Clinical Trials
    • Search Clinical Trials
    • Patient Notification System
    • What is Clinical Research?
    • Volunteering for a Clinical Trial
    • Understanding Informed Consent
    • Useful Resources
    • FDA Approved Drugs
  • Professional Resources
    • Research Center Profiles
    • Clinical Trial Listings
    • Market Research
    • FDA Approved Drugs
    • Training Guides
    • Books
    • eLearning
    • Events
    • Newsletters
    • White Papers
    • SOPs
    • eCFR and Guidances
  • White Papers
  • Trial Listings
  • Advertise
  • COVID-19
  • iConnect
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » MD Anderson Cancer Center Called Out Over Failure to Post Clinical Trial Results

MD Anderson Cancer Center Called Out Over Failure to Post Clinical Trial Results

October 18, 2021

A U.S. advocacy group has filed a formal ethics complaint against MD Anderson Cancer Center for declining to publicly post the results of a clinical trial that wrapped up 16 years ago.

The trial, which compared the effectiveness of surgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery in treating brain cancer, ended in 2005, according to ClinicalTrials.gov. But the issue at hand is that MD Anderson Cancer Center has, to date, not made the results of the study public.

It’s another example of mounting pressure on the clinical research industry to be more transparent with their trial data. TranspariMED, the group that filed the complaint, argued that MD Anderson violated the Declaration of Helsinki by failing to post the results of the study.

“Unreported clinical trial results make no contribution to medical progress and thus constitute research waste,” the group said in its complaint. “This violation would not have occurred if MD Anderson as an institution had had appropriate policies, systems and safeguards in place.”

In addition to not posting the results publicly, a representative with the cancer center also reportedly refused a request by outside researchers in Germany to share the results with them, the group claims.

A U.S. law was enacted in 2007 requiring sponsors to report their results and a rule came into effect in 2017 outlining the requirements for trial registration and results submissions. Currently, trials must be registered on ClinicalTrials.gov no later than 21 days after initiation and results must be posted within a year of completion (or within 30 calendar days after FDA approval, licensure or clearance).

MD Anderson defended its clinical trial reporting practices in a statement to CenterWatch Weekly, contending that it tried multiple times, to no avail, to get the trial data peer-reviewed and accepted for publication.

“While MD Anderson’s Compliance Office is reviewing the complaint, it is important to note that the study referenced was terminated years before the federal regulations to publish the results went into effect. It is not normal practice for any organization to reopen a completed study to fulfill a requirement that did not exist at the time. Additionally, the data have not been accepted for publication despite multiple efforts and submissions by the PI,” the center said. “Without peer review, we believe that the wide distribution of inconclusive clinical study results is inappropriate as these can lead to misleading interpretation and negative impact for patients. This is counter to the principles of scientific exchange.”

Regulators have recently begun cranking up the heat on sponsors and investigators who fail to publicly post results and industry in general has made data transparency more of a goal to reach. The FDA issued its first-ever notices of noncompliance this year that carry the weight of monetary fines if results aren’t posted on ClinicalTrials.gov (CenterWatch Weekly, Sept. 13).

Access the TranspariMED complaint here: https://bit.ly/3ALEnZu.

To view more CenterWatch Weekly stories, click here.

Upcoming Events

  • 16Feb

    Fundamentals of FDA Inspection Management: Reduce Anxiety, Increase Inspection Success

  • 21May

    WCG MAGI Clinical Research Conference – 2023 East

Featured Products

  • Spreadsheet Validation: Tools and Techniques to Make Data in Excel Compliant

    Spreadsheet Validation: Tools and Techniques to Make Data in Excel Compliant

  • Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection

    Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection: Resources for Investigators, Sponsors, CROs and IRBs

Featured Stories

  • SurveywBlueBackground-360x240.png

    Sites Name Tech Acceptance as Essential Factor in Selection of Sponsors, Survey Finds

  • TrendsInsights2023-360x240.png

    WCG Clinical Research Trends and Insights for 2023, Part Two

  • TimeMoneyEffort-360x240.png

    Time is Money and So Is Effort, Budgeting Experts Say

  • TrendsInsights2023A-360x240.png

    WCG Clinical Research Trends and Insights for 2023, Part Three

Standard Operating Procedures for Risk-Based Monitoring of Clinical Trials

The information you need to adapt your monitoring plan to changing times.

Learn More Here
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Data

Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 617.948.5100 – Toll free 866.219.3440

Copyright © 2023. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing