• SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Patient Resources
    • COVID-19 Patient Resource Center
    • Clinical Trials
    • Search Clinical Trials
    • Patient Notification System
    • What is Clinical Research?
    • Volunteering for a Clinical Trial
    • Understanding Informed Consent
    • Useful Resources
    • FDA Approved Drugs
  • Professional Resources
    • Research Center Profiles
    • Clinical Trial Listings
    • Market Research
    • FDA Approved Drugs
    • Training Guides
    • Books
    • eLearning
    • Events
    • Newsletters
    • JobWatch
    • White Papers
    • SOPs
    • eCFR and Guidances
  • White Papers
  • Trial Listings
  • Advertise
  • COVID-19
  • iConnect
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » Users of CT.gov Want Plain Language, Greater Standardization in Modernization Effort

Users of CT.gov Want Plain Language, Greater Standardization in Modernization Effort

May 4, 2020

Users of ClinicalTrials.gov want improved website functionality, greater standardization in the submission process of trials and trial results and more plain language content.

CT.gov should allow trial searches by genetic mutation or biomarker, intervention type, disease subtype, inclusion or exclusion criteria, and physical distance between study sites and location of participants. Other users said they wanted to have an option that would allow them to download a list of search results as well as a feature that could notify them when updates are made to saved searches.

That’s the upshot of 268 comments sent to the National Library of Medicine (NLM) about modernizing CT.gov. Many responses described the desire for more plain language that would be user-friendly, especially for patients, caregivers and advocacy groups.

The comments were summarized during a virtual public meeting last week; 49 percent of commenters were researchers, 19 percent were patients and caregivers and the remaining respondents classified themselves as “other” users.

Approximately 20 percent of those commenters want to improve the functionality of CT.gov’s study records. Commenters suggested that certain information in the study record — including eligibility criteria, funding sources, study status and funding information — should be displayed more prominently.

A poll conducted during last week’s virtual meeting found that half of participants rated standardization for data elements the most important change that can be made to the clinical trials registry. Close behind was more flexibility for data elements and study record structure, which was rated important by 35 percent of participants. Approximately 30 percent of participants also said they would prefer the registry include more tools to simplify data entry.

Allowing users to upload Microsoft Excel files to the site’s database or to import data directly from electronic data-capture systems were common suggestions for accomplishing that.

Many respondents recommended improvements to the website’s search engine. One recommendation included the addition of a function that would walk users through the steps of building a search query.

Upcoming Events

  • 24May

    Powering an Effective Oversight Strategy with Clinical and Operational Insights

  • 25May

    2022 WCG Avoca Quality & Innovation Summit: Own the Future

  • 28Jun

    Effective Root Cause Analysis and CAPA Investigations for the Life Sciences

  • 16Oct

    WCG MAGI's Clinical Research Hybrid Conference - 2022 West

Featured Products

  • Spreadsheet Validation: Tools and Techniques to Make Data in Excel Compliant

    Spreadsheet Validation: Tools and Techniques to Make Data in Excel Compliant

  • Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection

    Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection: Resources for Investigators, Sponsors, CROs and IRBs

Featured Stories

  • Protocol-360x240.png

    Avoid Deviations by Making Protocol Review a Team Effort

  • SelectionProcess-360x240.png

    Give Us a Voice: Sites Clamor for a Say on Vendor Selection

  • Convince-360x240.png

    Use Data and Details to Convince Site Leadership to Add Staff

  • AsktheExpertsBadge-360x240.png

    Ask the Experts: Listing Trial Staff and Others on the Statement of Investigator

Standard Operating Procedures for Risk-Based Monitoring of Clinical Trials

The information you need to adapt your monitoring plan to changing times.

Learn More Here
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 617.948.5100 – Toll free 866.219.3440

Copyright © 2022. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing