• SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Patient Resources
    • COVID-19 Patient Resource Center
    • Clinical Trials
    • Search Clinical Trials
    • Patient Notification System
    • What is Clinical Research?
    • Volunteering for a Clinical Trial
    • Understanding Informed Consent
    • Useful Resources
    • FDA Approved Drugs
  • Professional Resources
    • Research Center Profiles
    • Clinical Trial Listings
    • Market Research
    • FDA Approved Drugs
    • Training Guides
    • Books
    • eLearning
    • Events
    • Newsletters
    • White Papers
    • SOPs
    • eCFR and Guidances
  • White Papers
  • Trial Listings
  • Advertise
  • COVID-19
  • iConnect
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » PPD names CEO, puts acquisition rumors in question

PPD names CEO, puts acquisition rumors in question

September 26, 2011
CenterWatch Staff

PPD has named a new CEO, a move that strikes some in the industry as a little strange in the face of rumors that the publicly traded CRO is close to selling itself to a private equity firm.

Naming a new CEO just before being acquired and taken private is not a typical corporate move, say some analysts who watch the CRO space.

The appointment of Raymond Hill, formerly president of IMS Health’s Consulting Group, could mean PPD’s rumored deal with the Carlyle Group is off. Or, it simply could indicate that acquisition talks are taking more time than anticipated and the company needed to fill the hole left by David Grange, who stepped down in February after just two years as CEO.

No one knows for sure. And there is another possibility, said Neal McCarthy, managing director of investment banking firm Fairmount Partners.

“We don’t know whether or not Hill was a suggestion of one or more of the equity investors” PPD has been rumored to be in talks with, said McCarthy.

And Wilmington, N.C.-based PPD—considered the third largest CRO in the market behind Quintiles and Covance—is not talking.

But John Kreger, CRO-focused analyst with William Blair, said that’s not a likely scenario. “Are you going to let a potential investor tell you who to hire? What if that potential investor walks away?” said Kreger.

Instead, he thinks hiring a CEO to replace one who stepped down eight months ago is right in line with what a strategic investor would want. “We recently asked an equity investment firm for their thoughts on this, and they said, ‘We’d rather see a CEO in place, rather than us having to go though the process after a sale,’” said Kreger. “It’s more likely that the process (of an acquisition) is held up until you fill this key position.”

One reason this may look odd to the industry is that most large companies do not operate for eight months without a CEO, regardless of whether a sale is in the offing.

Hill, whose move to PPD became effective Sept. 16, worked for IMS for eight years, during which the formerly public company was acquired and taken private for $6 billion and was named one of Fortune’s World’s Most Admired Companies 2011.

The large, 55-year-old pharmaceutical services company provides data, market research and consulting services to clients in the pharmaceutical and health care industries. McCarthy said there is some overlap in marketing data and consulting services between the two companies.

According to PPD, during Hill’s tenure at IMS he oversaw a strategy of aggressive organic and acquisition-based growth, and annual revenue increased five-fold. Hill also served on the executive leadership team of IMS, helping to set the overall direction of the company.

Despite Hill’s lack of CRO experience, Kreger thinks he’s a good match. “His experience and track record make him well suited for the CEO role at PPD, in our view, and we believe he will be a strong addition to the company’s senior management team,” wrote Kreger in an analyst report.

Rumors began circulating in July that PPD was for sale. At that time, PPD issued a statement saying, “We are looking at our long-term plan and our capital structure to see if there are any actions which might create value at this time.” On Aug. 16, Bloomberg News reported through unnamed sources that the lead contender was Washington, D.C.-based Carlyle Group, a private equity firm with assets exceeding $150 billion in 84 funds. Bloomberg also reported Carlyle was talking to other private equity firms about joining it in an offer for PPD, and that Morgan Stanley was advising PPD.

But PPD, which has 11,000 employees and brought in close to $1.5 billion in revenue last year, has neither confirmed nor denied the Bloomberg report.

The last 18 months has seen a constant stream of CRO-private equity firm activity. In May, CCMP Capital bought Medpace, and in April, Nautic Partners acquired Omnicare Clinical Research. In December 2010, Warburg Pincus purchased RPS. Last August, Avista Capital acquired INC Research, which then bought Kendle International in May. Thomas H. Lee Partners acquired inVentiv in May 2010, and then inVentiv bought i3 in January and recently completed its purchase of PharmaNet.

When can some action be expected? Wrote Kreger in his analyst report, “Considering that Mr. Hill has just joined the company, we now expect no further news on the strategic review from the company until the third-quarter call at the earliest.”

Suz Redfearn

Upcoming Events

  • 16Feb

    Fundamentals of FDA Inspection Management: Reduce Anxiety, Increase Inspection Success

  • 21May

    WCG MAGI Clinical Research Conference – 2023 East

Featured Products

  • Spreadsheet Validation: Tools and Techniques to Make Data in Excel Compliant

    Spreadsheet Validation: Tools and Techniques to Make Data in Excel Compliant

  • Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection

    Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection: Resources for Investigators, Sponsors, CROs and IRBs

Featured Stories

  • SurveywBlueBackground-360x240.png

    Sites Name Tech Acceptance as Essential Factor in Selection of Sponsors, Survey Finds

  • TrendsInsights2023-360x240.png

    WCG Clinical Research Trends and Insights for 2023, Part Two

  • TimeMoneyEffort-360x240.png

    Time is Money and So Is Effort, Budgeting Experts Say

  • TrendsInsights2023A-360x240.png

    WCG Clinical Research Trends and Insights for 2023, Part Three

Standard Operating Procedures for Risk-Based Monitoring of Clinical Trials

The information you need to adapt your monitoring plan to changing times.

Learn More Here
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Data

Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 617.948.5100 – Toll free 866.219.3440

Copyright © 2023. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing