• SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Patient Resources
    • Clinical Trial Listings
    • What is Clinical Research?
    • Volunteering for a Clinical Trial
    • Understanding Informed Consent
    • Useful Resources
    • FDA Approved Drugs
  • Professional Resources
    • Research Center Profiles
    • Market Research
    • Benchmark Reports
    • FDA Approved Drugs
    • Training Guides
    • Books
    • eLearning
    • Events
    • Newsletters
    • White Papers
    • SOPs
  • White Papers
  • Clinical Trial Listings
  • Advertise
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » Survey reveals large technology gap in managing clinical trial documentation

Survey reveals large technology gap in managing clinical trial documentation

October 9, 2013
CenterWatch Staff

NextDocs, a provider of regulated content management and compliance solutions for clinical trials, released its report, The State of Trial Master File (TMF), examining TMF management in the life sciences and pharmaceutical industry. The report, based on survey responses from more than 50 life sciences companies, reveals a large technology gap in the management of TMF.

"The life sciences industry is focusing on new strategies to drive down the cost of running clinical trials," said Zikria Syed, CEO of NextDocs. "When it comes to TMF management, half of the industry is moving rapidly to electronic Trial Master File management (eTMF) to make the process more efficient; the other half is still largely managing these essential documents manually. There is a big disparity here."

Despite widespread discussion and success with eTMF in the pharmaceutical and medical device industry, a significant number of companies still use paper to manage clinical trial documents. Nearly 30% of those surveyed still rely entirely on a paper-based, manual system. An additional 20% use a hybrid solution, with some trial documents on paper and some in an electronic system.  And 22% use a shared file system, while only 24% manage all clinical trial documentation in a purpose-built eTMF system.

NextDocs conducted the survey to better understand how companies are managing trial master files. It queried respondents on the major features, obstacles and key performance metrics surrounding the implementation of an eTMF system. Although the survey revealed an increased use of electronic solutions over previous years, companies still face significant challenges managing clinical trial documentation.

The survey reported the top three challenges to managing trial master files were the time required to locate and manage TMF documents (48%), the lack of visibility into the status of clinical trial documents (35%) and inefficient processes for global teams to contribute documents (31%). Respondents using a commercial electronic trial master file (eTMF) applications reported fewer challenges in these three areas (38%, 23% and 23%, respectively).

While saving money and gaining a high return on investment were cited as primary benefits of implementing an eTMF solution (43%), the survey showed for most respondents, other benefits were just as important. Companies were concerned first and foremost with improving productivity (74%). Other business objectives included quick clinical study preparation (44%) and improved audit results (38%).

The key factors in driving eTMF adoption were document management functionality (53%), global accessibility (44%) and cost considerations (39%).

Respondents reported a lack of staff (40%) and a lack of funds (33%) among the top reasons companies hold back from implementing an eTMF solution.

"Ironically, the rationale that some life sciences companies give for delaying the inevitable introduction of eTMF—staff and budget constraints—are two of the biggest areas where the business can benefit from an eTMF: increased productivity and cost savings," said Syed.

    Upcoming Events

    • 16Oct

      MAGI@home Clinical Research Conference 2023

    • 25Oct

      2023 WCG Patient Forum

    • 26Oct

      FDA in 2024: What to Expect in an Election Year

    Featured Products

    • Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection

      Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection: Resources for Investigators, Sponsors, CROs and IRBs

    • Best Practices for Clinical Trial Site Management

      Best Practices for Clinical Trial Site Management

    Featured Stories

    • Donna Snyder

      New WCG Executive Physician Outlines Goals for Clinical Research

    • Hand Shake at Meeting

      Partnership to Bolster Trials in Low Resource Regions Kicks Off

    • Guidelines-360x240.png

      Major Industry Groups Offer Feedback on ICH’s E6(R3) Guidelines

    • AsktheExpertsBadge-360x240.png

      Ask the Experts: Monitoring

    Standard Operating Procedures for Risk-Based Monitoring of Clinical Trials

    The information you need to adapt your monitoring plan to changing times.

    Learn More Here
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell or Share My Data

    Footer Logo

    300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

    Phone 703.538.7600 – Toll free 888.838.5578

    Copyright © 2023. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing