• SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Patient Resources
    • COVID-19 Patient Resource Center
    • Clinical Trials
    • Search Clinical Trials
    • Patient Notification System
    • What is Clinical Research?
    • Volunteering for a Clinical Trial
    • Understanding Informed Consent
    • Useful Resources
    • FDA Approved Drugs
  • Professional Resources
    • Research Center Profiles
    • Clinical Trial Listings
    • Market Research
    • FDA Approved Drugs
    • Training Guides
    • Books
    • eLearning
    • Events
    • Newsletters
    • JobWatch
    • White Papers
    • SOPs
    • eCFR and Guidances
  • White Papers
  • Trial Listings
  • Advertise
  • COVID-19
  • iConnect
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » Classifying clinical trial portals

Classifying clinical trial portals

June 15, 2015
CenterWatch Staff

A popular driver of clinical trial portal adoption is the desire to improve investigative site staff satisfaction by providing integrated solutions that require fewer credentials, less double data entry and fewer manual paper processes. Other objectives include decreasing study timelines (especially site selection and activation), cutting study costs, improving study team oversight and moving to a paperless environment.

The term “portal” is overused in the clinical trial setting, and the problems portals solve are unclear. To provide more clarity regarding portal categories and the features they can provide, portals should be classified by levels:

Level 1—Information-sharing: Able to restrict access to the system and control which studies a user can see; provides basic collaboration tools.

Level 2—Collaboration: Has level 1 capabilities plus role-based access and permissions, offers mechanisms by which study teams and sites can send/ receive files and provides single sign- on to third-party applications.

Level 3—Business-enabling: Offers level 2 capabilities plus a full audit trail and integrated task management and workflow tools.

Level 4—Integrated: Has level 3 capabilities, plus the ability to push/pull data from other eClinical systems and generate integrated reports that show overall site/study progress.

  • Achieving desired business outcomes requires certain portal levels: Increase site satisfaction: Reduce the staff need to remember multiple credentials for the various eClinical systems. (Level 2 portal minimum)
  • Improve study timelines: Offer collaboration or business-enablement applications. (Level 2 or 3)
  • Decrease study operating costs: Reduce task duration by implementing collaboration or business-enablement applications. Automate document exchange with sites and reduce courier costs. (Level 3 or 4)
  • Increase visibility and oversight capabilities: Employ a portal that tracks activities, assigns tasks and reports activity within (and ultimately outside of) the portal. (Level 3 or 4)

In addition to categorizing clinical trial portals based on functionality, the industry also should consider collaborating with a standards organization, such as OASIS or ISO, to define interoperability standards.

 

Written by Guest Writer Lance Converse. Converse is CEO of ePharmaSolutions, a WIRB-Copernicus Group company. Before starting ePharmaSolutions, he founded Acurian, an investigator and patient recruitment company, and ReSearch Pharmaceutical Services, a publicly-traded CRO. He also is a co-founder and board member of two biopharmaceutical companies.

Christopher McSpiritt, practice lead-clinical optimization at Paragon Solutions, contributed to this article.

This article was reprinted from Volume 22, Issue 06, of The CenterWatch Monthly, an industry leading publication providing hard-hitting, authoritative business and financial coverage of the clinical research space. The Action Items section features short columns  focusing on actionable or how-to advice from clinical trial professionals. To submit an Action Item, please contact editorial@centerwatch.com. Subscribe >>

 

Upcoming Events

  • 24May

    Powering an Effective Oversight Strategy with Clinical and Operational Insights

  • 25May

    2022 WCG Avoca Quality & Innovation Summit: Own the Future

  • 28Jun

    Effective Root Cause Analysis and CAPA Investigations for the Life Sciences

  • 16Oct

    WCG MAGI's Clinical Research Hybrid Conference - 2022 West

Featured Products

  • Spreadsheet Validation: Tools and Techniques to Make Data in Excel Compliant

    Spreadsheet Validation: Tools and Techniques to Make Data in Excel Compliant

  • Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection

    Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection: Resources for Investigators, Sponsors, CROs and IRBs

Featured Stories

  • Protocol-360x240.png

    Avoid Deviations by Making Protocol Review a Team Effort

  • SelectionProcess-360x240.png

    Give Us a Voice: Sites Clamor for a Say on Vendor Selection

  • Convince-360x240.png

    Use Data and Details to Convince Site Leadership to Add Staff

  • AsktheExpertsBadge-360x240.png

    Ask the Experts: Listing Trial Staff and Others on the Statement of Investigator

Standard Operating Procedures for Risk-Based Monitoring of Clinical Trials

The information you need to adapt your monitoring plan to changing times.

Learn More Here
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 617.948.5100 – Toll free 866.219.3440

Copyright © 2022. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing