• SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Patient Resources
    • COVID-19 Patient Resource Center
    • Clinical Trials
    • Search Clinical Trials
    • Patient Notification System
    • What is Clinical Research?
    • Volunteering for a Clinical Trial
    • Understanding Informed Consent
    • Useful Resources
    • FDA Approved Drugs
  • Professional Resources
    • Research Center Profiles
    • Clinical Trial Listings
    • Market Research
    • FDA Approved Drugs
    • Training Guides
    • Books
    • eLearning
    • Events
    • Newsletters
    • JobWatch
    • White Papers
    • SOPs
    • eCFR and Guidances
  • White Papers
  • Trial Listings
  • Advertise
  • COVID-19
  • iConnect
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » Understanding feasibility for faster clinical trials

Understanding feasibility for faster clinical trials

January 1, 2016
CenterWatch Staff

Do you hate to be late? Most people do, but CenterWatch surveys of investigative sites show the majority have delays. A root cause is increasing eligibility cri­teria (up 58% in the last decade). It is no wonder that sites say recruit­ment is the biggest cause of delay; with more criteria, fewer patients qualify.

The fastest and most efficient sponsors are simplifying design procedures to reduce protocol complexity. One way to better study feasibility is to understand patient availability for the inclu­sion/exclusion criteria. Sponsors attempt to do so with question­naires sent to sites. Unfortunately, answers can be inaccurate. A bet­ter solution is to base feasibility on national patient counts; the data­bases are from insurance claims and electronic health records (EHR).

Insurance claims and EHR da­tabases can identify how many patients exist. The databases begin with a de-identified sample of pa­tients who have the targeted con­dition; they show the percentage of patients lost for each specification. For instance, according to Optum insurance-claims data, a sponsor would exclude 76% of adult dia­betics from a trial if it excluded all forms of hypertension. The spon­sor can then determine if that percentage is too high. EHR can assess things in a medical record not found in claims. Next, this method shows the net percentage of patients who meet all criteria; it therefore predicts if recruitment will be easy or hard, making it possible to plan resources.

An added benefit of insurance claims is that the information can be used to locate patients—or “fish where the fish are.” Claims can rank physicians and investigators on patient count. (See more in my Action Items article planned for April.)

Does your company embrace quantitative methods when deter­mining feasibility and site identi­fication? If not, these approaches are the wave of the future, and the future is now.

 

Written by Guest Writer Bill Gwinn. Gwinn is vice president of clinical informatics solutions at Optum, a subsidiary of United Health Group, a diversified managed healthcare company. He supports the clinical trials of new drugs with medical statistics. His expertise lies in quantitative analysis for site selection and finding patients. His prior experience includes positions at Medstat Group at Thomson Reuters, IMS Health, Schering-Plough, and Procter & Gamble. Gwinn holds an M.B.A. degree from the University of Chicago and a B.A. degree from Vanderbilt University.

This article was reprinted from Volume 22, Issue 12, of The CenterWatch Monthly, an industry leading publication providing hard-hitting, authoritative business and financial coverage of the clinical research space. The Action Items section features short columns  focusing on actionable or how-to advice from clinical trial professionals. To submit an Action Item, please contact editorial@centerwatch.com. Subscribe >>

Upcoming Events

  • 24May

    Powering an Effective Oversight Strategy with Clinical and Operational Insights

  • 25May

    2022 WCG Avoca Quality & Innovation Summit: Own the Future

  • 28Jun

    Effective Root Cause Analysis and CAPA Investigations for the Life Sciences

  • 16Oct

    WCG MAGI's Clinical Research Hybrid Conference - 2022 West

Featured Products

  • Spreadsheet Validation: Tools and Techniques to Make Data in Excel Compliant

    Spreadsheet Validation: Tools and Techniques to Make Data in Excel Compliant

  • Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection

    Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection: Resources for Investigators, Sponsors, CROs and IRBs

Featured Stories

  • Protocol-360x240.png

    Avoid Deviations by Making Protocol Review a Team Effort

  • SelectionProcess-360x240.png

    Give Us a Voice: Sites Clamor for a Say on Vendor Selection

  • Convince-360x240.png

    Use Data and Details to Convince Site Leadership to Add Staff

  • AsktheExpertsBadge-360x240.png

    Ask the Experts: Listing Trial Staff and Others on the Statement of Investigator

Standard Operating Procedures for Risk-Based Monitoring of Clinical Trials

The information you need to adapt your monitoring plan to changing times.

Learn More Here
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 617.948.5100 – Toll free 866.219.3440

Copyright © 2022. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing