• SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Patient Resources
    • Clinical Trial Listings
    • What are Clinical Trials?
    • Become a Clinical Trial Volunteer
    • Useful Resources
    • FDA Approved Drugs
  • Professional Resources
    • Research Center Profiles
    • Market Research
    • Benchmark Reports
    • FDA Approved Drugs
    • Training Guides
    • Books
    • eLearning
    • Events
    • Newsletters
    • White Papers
    • SOPs
  • White Papers
  • Clinical Trial Listings
  • Advertise
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » Icon, Carnegie Mellon research validates shorter patient consent processes

Icon, Carnegie Mellon research validates shorter patient consent processes

June 6, 2016
CenterWatch Staff

Icon, a global provider of drug development solutions and services to the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device industries, and Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) partnered on patient consent process research.

The results, which were recently published in Medical Decision Making journal, show that patient consent forms could be shortened by up to 86% without losing critical understanding or sacrificing the content required by ethics boards. The research also found greater patient engagement when using a shorter paper form or when using a video format, compared with more traditional, paper-based approaches.

Academic researchers at CMU conducted a number of studies evaluating patient-centric and patient-designed informed consent formats. In the first study, 118 asthma patients examined sections of a standard informed consent document for an asthma trial and then selected and ranked the information they deemed critical to their decision making. In the second study, 83 asthma patients were randomly assigned to review either a full informed consent document; a shortened document, based on patient preferences from the first study; or a video that presented patient consent information in an animated format. The video was developed by Icon, using its Firecrest suite of multi-media solutions.

In the first study, patients identified a fraction of the content on a typical informed consent form as relevant to their deciding whether to participate in a trial. Their preferences led to a significantly (86%) shorter consent form, with greater emphasis on aspects that directly affected them (including trial procedures, potential side effects and benefits) and less attention to aspects that mattered less to them (e.g. privacy assurances, procedural information for clinical staff). In the second study, participants who received the shortened paper form and video format absorbed as much information as participants receiving the long form, and described themselves as more engaged. Those receiving the video format rated themselves significantly higher scores on physician trust.

Dr. Lars-Olof Eriksson, EVP Site and Patient Recruitment, said, “Informed consent materials are very often long, complicated and too technical which is why we commissioned CMU to examine how a simpler, more patient-centric approach would affect patients’ understanding, confidence and trust. Through this research, patients have made their information needs and preferences very clear. We have already incorporated the CMU research findings into our Firecrest eConsent and Patient Portal solutions and we remain committed to developing further innovative solutions that drive better patient recruitment and engagement in clinical trials.”

Icon’s Firecrest Patient Portal is the patient’s gateway to clinical trials and has been specifically designed to enhance patients’ understanding of treatment before consenting to participate in a trial. Patients using the Patient Portal can find active trials, complete pre-screening questionnaires and watch educational videos in the comfort of their own homes, before choosing a convenient study location. The Patient Portal also includes a patient visit-by-visit guide, which informs patients about what to expect during site visits.

    Upcoming Events

    • 05Dec

      Thriving in Clinical Research – Overcoming Common Challenges as a Site: Part 3 – Site Resourcing

    • 14Apr

      MAGI 2024: The Clinical Research Conference

    Featured Products

    • Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection

      Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection: Resources for Investigators, Sponsors, CROs and IRBs

    • Best Practices for Clinical Trial Site Management

      Best Practices for Clinical Trial Site Management

    Featured Stories

    • Jonathan Seltzer

      Thought Leadership: Remote Patient Monitoring Gives New View of Safety in Cardiac Clinical Trials

    • Quality_Compass-360x240.png

      Ask the Experts: Applying Quality by Design to Protocols

    • Obesity Treatment Patient

      Clinical Trials Need Greater Representation of Obese Patients, Experts Say

    • Modernize-360x240.png

      FDA IT Modernization Plan Prioritizes Data-Sharing, AI, Collaboration and More

    Standard Operating Procedures for Risk-Based Monitoring of Clinical Trials

    The information you need to adapt your monitoring plan to changing times.

    Learn More Here
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell or Share My Data

    Footer Logo

    300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

    Phone 703.538.7600 – Toll free 888.838.5578

    Copyright © 2023. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing