• SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Patient Resources
    • COVID-19 Patient Resource Center
    • Clinical Trial Listings
    • What is Clinical Research?
    • Volunteering for a Clinical Trial
    • Understanding Informed Consent
    • Useful Resources
    • FDA Approved Drugs
  • Professional Resources
    • Research Center Profiles
    • Market Research
    • FDA Approved Drugs
    • Training Guides
    • Books
    • eLearning
    • Events
    • Newsletters
    • White Papers
    • SOPs
    • eCFR and Guidances
  • White Papers
  • Clinical Trial Listings
  • Advertise
  • COVID-19
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » Study: 65% of pharma and biotech invest in patient-centric initiatives

Study: 65% of pharma and biotech invest in patient-centric initiatives

November 2, 2016
CenterWatch Staff

DIA, a professional community and knowledge exchange for global healthcare product development, announced results of its Study of Patient-Centric Initiatives in Drug Development, reporting that the majority of pharmaceutical and biotech companies surveys have adopted patient-centric initiatives in drug development.

The DIA study, conducted in partnership with Tufts University, found that 65% of pharmaceutical and biotech companies surveyed have budgeted and are investing in patient-centric initiatives in drug development. However, barriers such as risk tolerance, lack of staff, time, and budget have constrained implementation. Furthermore, quantifying results is challenging as there is limited comparative analytic data that support specific methods of patient-centricity.

The good news is that lower cost patient-centric initiatives are benefiting drug development. Reported benefits include reduced screen failure rates, faster patient recruitment, improved subject retention, reduced protocol amendments, and a greater number of patient relevant endpoints. In the study, cost of study conduct, ease of study conduct and reported impact were measured. The four standout patient-centric initiatives against these measurements were:

  1. Advocacy group support and involvement
  2. Patient Advisory Panels and Focus Groups
  3. Social media and online engagement
  4. Patient counseling and education

Notable insights from the study include improved study performance and study volunteer feedback as a result of engaging Patient Advocacy Groups in these four ways.

“Almost all stakeholders agree that engaging patients in the drug development process is valuable, but the DIA study reveals that they do not necessarily agree on why or how,” commented Sudip Parikh, Ph.D., senior vice president and managing director, DIA Americas.

“The purpose of medicines is to improve patients’ lives; therefore, patients should be at the center of the drug development life cycle. For over 15 years, DIA has led the way in recognizing the value of patient involvement in health care product development, and today the patient community is intimately woven into all aspects of our thought leadership and our global strategic plan,” said Barbara Lopez Kunz, global chief executive, DIA. “Our insights in the healthcare ecosystem and our ability to convene the broad stakeholder community, including patients, provides a unique advantage in identifying new ways to engage patients in health care product development and to catalyze action.”

DIA is calling for expressions of interest and recommendations for follow-on research in the following focus areas:

  • Identify where in the drug development life cycle patient involvement is most impactful on company, disease, and patient population characteristics, to produce validated metrics and optimal conditions for patient-centric initiatives impact.
  • Apply the defined set of patient-centric initiatives metrics and complete a broader study of current and future patient-centric initiatives to produce a tested and validated metrics toolkit for industry.
  • Based on patient-centric initiatives insights, DIA will identify and clarify the top three to five patient-centric initiative areas and shape guidance development in advance of and in parallel with PDUFA VI.

Upcoming Events

  • 12Apr

    The Participant Playbook Webinar Series, Part 3 — Rethinking the Development of Participant-Centric Clinical Trial Technology

  • 25Apr

    Effective Root Cause Analysis and CAPA Investigations for Drugs, Devices and Clinical Trials

  • 26Apr

    FDA’s New Laws and Regulations: What Drug and Biologics Manufacturers Need to Know

  • 27Apr

    Califf’s FDA, 2023 and Beyond: Key Developments, Insights and Analysis

  • 17May

    2023 WCG Avoca Quality Consortium Summit

  • 21May

    WCG MAGI Clinical Research Conference – 2023 East

Featured Products

  • Spreadsheet Validation: Tools and Techniques to Make Data in Excel Compliant

    Spreadsheet Validation: Tools and Techniques to Make Data in Excel Compliant

  • Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection

    Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection: Resources for Investigators, Sponsors, CROs and IRBs

Featured Stories

  • Five Ws

    Consider the Five ‘W’s to Understand Potential Participants

  • QandA-360x240.png

    Perspectives from Smaller-Sized CROs: Q&A with Cheryle Evans

  • White House

    Trial Stakeholders Advise White House on Emergency Research Infrastructure

  • SurveywBlueBackground-360x240.png

    Stress Levels Continue to Climb in Healthcare Workforce, Survey Finds

Standard Operating Procedures for Risk-Based Monitoring of Clinical Trials

The information you need to adapt your monitoring plan to changing times.

Learn More Here
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Data

Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 617.948.5100 – Toll free 866.219.3440

Copyright © 2023. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing