• SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Patient Resources
    • COVID-19 Patient Resource Center
    • Clinical Trial Listings
    • What is Clinical Research?
    • Volunteering for a Clinical Trial
    • Understanding Informed Consent
    • Useful Resources
    • FDA Approved Drugs
  • Professional Resources
    • Research Center Profiles
    • Market Research
    • FDA Approved Drugs
    • Training Guides
    • Books
    • eLearning
    • Events
    • Newsletters
    • White Papers
    • SOPs
    • eCFR and Guidances
  • White Papers
  • Clinical Trial Listings
  • Advertise
  • COVID-19
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » Engaging patients for a more successful clinical trial

Engaging patients for a more successful clinical trial

November 15, 2016
CenterWatch Staff

Recruitment has always been a key element to a successful clinical trial, and in the past several years the concept of patient engagement—be­yond getting patients in the door—has grown. Historically for rare and orphan disease trials, engagement has helped recruit patients and make sure they are familiar with the treatments involved in the study, which makes them more willing to utilize the treat­ment once it has been approved.

Patient engagement is not a new concept. Different eClinical tools such as electronic patient-reported out­comes (ePRO) or interactive response technology (IRT) have been in use for some time as a way to get information directly from patients rather than fil­tered through the perspective of inves­tigators. Recently, however, patient ad­vocacy groups and other networks are getting involved in new ways, whether it be by coordinating with sponsors or providing input on protocols, par­ticularly for rare or complex diseases. Advocacy groups are expanding into more areas as well. Where they may have once been reserved for rare con­ditions, there are now many more patient advocacy groups available to provide resources and education to patients in a wide variety of diseases and conditions.

Engagement has become more advanced as it has expanded. Some sponsors are getting patients involved in study design, which connects di­rectly to patients via apps. Tradition­ally, a sponsor company would de­sign the study and set the endpoints without input from patients and with a focus on what doctors considered important. Today, it is more common for sponsors to ask patients: What is important to you in this study? Do the study objectives address your primary concerns? These strategies of early en­gagement can help sponsors provide the most clinically relevant endpoints to both the doctor and the patient, thus increasing the likelihood that a subject will seek to use the product once it is approved.

Patient engagement is key to the re­cruitment of patients for and retention of patients enrolled in clinical trials—but the question of how best to man­age new processes is still ongoing be­cause there are still some unaddressed regulatory concerns.

 

Written by Guest Writer Kristen Snipes. Snipes has over 18 years of pharmaceutical industry experience primarily as a program manager or clinical operations lead. Since joining Rho in 2007, she has been involved in leading and coordinating all operational activities for complex trials. She has managed analytical method development, formulation, IND filings (including CMC) and phase I-IV clinical trials. She is the Clinical Operations Service Lead for Rho, with responsibilities that include keeping the company current on industry trends and practices as well as supporting training and process development. www.rhoworld.com

This article was reprinted from Volume 23, Issue 11, of The CenterWatch Monthly, an industry leading publication providing hard-hitting, authoritative business and financial coverage of the clinical research space. The Action Items section features short columns  focusing on actionable or how-to advice from clinical trial professionals. To submit an Action Item, please contact editorial@centerwatch.com. Subscribe >>

Upcoming Events

  • 25Apr

    Effective Root Cause Analysis and CAPA Investigations for Drugs, Devices and Clinical Trials

  • 26Apr

    FDA’s New Laws and Regulations: What Drug and Biologics Manufacturers Need to Know

  • 27Apr

    Califf’s FDA, 2023 and Beyond: Key Developments, Insights and Analysis

  • 17May

    2023 WCG Avoca Quality Consortium Summit

  • 21May

    WCG MAGI Clinical Research Conference – 2023 East

Featured Products

  • Spreadsheet Validation: Tools and Techniques to Make Data in Excel Compliant

    Spreadsheet Validation: Tools and Techniques to Make Data in Excel Compliant

  • Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection

    Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection: Resources for Investigators, Sponsors, CROs and IRBs

Featured Stories

  • tablet

    Digital Intake Platforms Effective as Source of Trial Information, Survey Shows

  • Diversity-360x240.png

    Site Spotlight: EmVenio Research Takes to the Road to Promote Trial Diversity

  • Five Ws

    Consider the Five ‘W’s to Understand Potential Participants

  • QandA-360x240.png

    Perspectives from Smaller-Sized CROs: Q&A with Cheryle Evans

Standard Operating Procedures for Risk-Based Monitoring of Clinical Trials

The information you need to adapt your monitoring plan to changing times.

Learn More Here
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Data

Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 617.948.5100 – Toll free 866.219.3440

Copyright © 2023. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing