• SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Patient Resources
    • COVID-19 Patient Resource Center
    • Clinical Trials
    • Search Clinical Trials
    • Patient Notification System
    • What is Clinical Research?
    • Volunteering for a Clinical Trial
    • Understanding Informed Consent
    • Useful Resources
    • FDA Approved Drugs
  • Professional Resources
    • Research Center Profiles
    • Clinical Trial Listings
    • Market Research
    • FDA Approved Drugs
    • Training Guides
    • Books
    • eLearning
    • Events
    • Newsletters
    • White Papers
    • SOPs
    • eCFR and Guidances
  • White Papers
  • Trial Listings
  • Advertise
  • COVID-19
  • iConnect
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » Survey: Global clinical operations need to unify clinical applications

Survey: Global clinical operations need to unify clinical applications

June 21, 2017
CenterWatch Staff

There is an industry-wide drive toward a unified clinical operating model, according to the Veeva 2017 Unified Clinical Operations Survey, one of the industry’s largest annual surveys of clinical operations professionals. The new research from Veeva Systems reveals that nearly all respondents cite the need to unify their clinical applications, including EDC, CTMS and eTMF. More than 60% say faster study execution and improved study quality are the top drivers toward a unified clinical model, which is characterized by end-to-end processes and systems, visibility across the clinical life cycle and modern information systems.

Streamlining Clinical Systems and Processes

Many of the challenges sponsors face today in managing clinical trials stem from the disparate nature of their processes and systems. Respondents use an average of four applications to manage their clinical studies and more than one-third use at least five applications. The most commonly used applications are EDC and CTMS (81% and 59% respectively).

Nearly all survey respondents have at least one major challenge with their clinical applications and the top two challenges—integrating multiple applications (69%) and reporting across applications (61%)—are a direct result of system silos. Half of sponsors say issues integrating their EDC or eTMF applications with CTMS limits their organization’s ability to improve clinical operations.

Companies also say their current clinical systems are hard to use (46%) and lack the ability to support collaboration (33%). Usability and accessibility issues likely contribute to the difficulties one-third say they face with data being tracked outside of their clinical systems.

Half of respondents also cite better study visibility as one of the most important drivers for unifying the clinical landscape, especially given the challenges most have with reporting across multiple applications. The ability for companies to collect and leverage operational data throughout the clinical lifecycle has a direct impact on improving efficiency and execution in clinical operations.

Transitioning to Modern Information Systems

Companies have started on a path to unified clinical enabled, in part, by the introduction of newer, more advanced applications and platforms. Trial master file (TMF) management is one of the first areas to experience rapid transformation. Over the past four years there has been a major shift as one in three (31%) sponsors now use an advanced eTMF application, more than double the number in 2014.

The transition toward modern, purpose-built eTMF applications and ‘active’ TMF management—the ability to manage information and processes in real-time as the TMF is being generated—is delivering greater benefits than ‘passive’ first-generation local file systems and cloud file shares. More than three-quarters (79%) of sponsors report improvements in inspection readiness after implementing an active eTMF application. Modern eTMF applications also significantly improve activities key to unifying clinical operations and better managing the growing volume and complexity of clinical trials, including visibility into key study performance metrics.

There is also a significant shift underway in clinical trial management as life sciences companies expect to increase their CTMS investments by almost 15% each year through 2020. This is being driven by rising demand for data and site collection solutions and the availability of next-generation CTMS applications. This is not surprising, given that nearly all sponsors (98%) say challenges with their current CTMS applications are limiting their ability to improve clinical operations. Among their biggest issues are their inability to fully support resource management (77%), study and site feasibility (76%), financial management (75%) and issue/task management (73%).

“The industry’s transition toward a unified clinical environment is being driven by its need to address the silos legacy systems have created,” said Jennifer Goldsmith, senior vice president of Veeva Vault. “Life sciences companies are taking steps to streamline their end-to-end processes and systems with modern applications so they can execute faster and improve visibility across their study portfolios.”

The Veeva 2017 Unified Clinical Operations Survey examines the life sciences industry’s progress toward a unified clinical environment by gathering the experiences and opinions of 300 clinical operations professionals from around the globe. Evolved from the annual Veeva Paperless TMF Survey, this research examines the drivers, barriers, and benefits of a unified clinical operating model and tracks the move to streamline clinical systems and processes.

The full results of the Veeva 2017 Unified Clinical Operations Survey were presented at the DIA 2017 Annual Meeting on June 20. The report is also available online at veeva.com/ClinicalSurvey.

Upcoming Events

  • 16Feb

    Fundamentals of FDA Inspection Management: Reduce Anxiety, Increase Inspection Success

  • 21May

    WCG MAGI Clinical Research Conference – 2023 East

Featured Products

  • Spreadsheet Validation: Tools and Techniques to Make Data in Excel Compliant

    Spreadsheet Validation: Tools and Techniques to Make Data in Excel Compliant

  • Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection

    Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection: Resources for Investigators, Sponsors, CROs and IRBs

Featured Stories

  • SurveywBlueBackground-360x240.png

    Sites Name Tech Acceptance as Essential Factor in Selection of Sponsors, Survey Finds

  • TrendsInsights2023-360x240.png

    WCG Clinical Research Trends and Insights for 2023, Part Two

  • TimeMoneyEffort-360x240.png

    Time is Money and So Is Effort, Budgeting Experts Say

  • TrendsInsights2023A-360x240.png

    WCG Clinical Research Trends and Insights for 2023, Part Three

Standard Operating Procedures for Risk-Based Monitoring of Clinical Trials

The information you need to adapt your monitoring plan to changing times.

Learn More Here
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Data

Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 617.948.5100 – Toll free 866.219.3440

Copyright © 2023. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing