Clinical Trial Result Information
Title of Study:
An Open-Label, Phase II Study of Capecitabine in Combination with Oxaliplatin as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced and/or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Fast Facts:
| Protocol number: | M66016 |
| Sponsor: | Hoffman-La Roche Ltd |
| Company division: | Pharmaceutical |
| Product name: | Xeloda |
| Generic name: | capecitabine |
| Phase of development: | II |
| Therapeutic area, approved indication: | Colorectal Cancer |
| Date of report: | 2/16/2004 |
Clinical study summary:
This open-label, multicenter, multinational, single-arm study assessed the efficacy and safety of capecitabine (Xeloda) in combination with oxaliplatin as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced and/or metastatic colorectal cancer.
Study center(s) :
Study sites in 8 countries: Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Israel, Italy, and Spain.
Objectives:
Primary: To evaluate overall response rate (complete and partial responses).
Secondary: (1) To evaluate time to progression, time to response, duration of response, and time to treatment failure; (2) to determine 1-year survival and overall survival; (3) to evaluate the safety profile of the combination of oxaliplatin and Xeloda.
Methodology:
Tumor assessments were made within 14 days prior to initiation of treatment by a suitable reproducible technique (magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography scan, or X-ray films), and the same modality was used for all assessments for an individual patient throughout the study. Tumor response was assessed after the first 9 weeks (after the first 3 cycles) and thereafter every 6 weeks (2 cycles). For those patients with no progressive disease following treatment completion, time to disease progression was evaluated on a 3-monthly basis until disease progression and post-study treatment information was collected for these patients. Survival was evaluated on a 3-monthly basis until death or lost-to-follow-up after treatment completion. Adverse events were monitored throughout the treatment period and for 28 days after the last intake/infusion of study drug. Hematology and blood chemistry were reviewed prior to treatment initiation and before starting each cycle of treatment. Urinalysis, electrocardiography, and chest X-ray were performed as clinically indicated.
Number of patients (planned/analyzed):
96
Diagnosis and main criteria for inclusion:
Patients with measurable, histologically confirmed metastatic or locally advanced colorectal carcinoma, who have not received any chemotherapy (except when given as adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment and completed >=6 months prior to initiation of study treatment).
Test product, dose and mode of administration or test procedure:
Xeloda1000 mg/sqm po, twice daily as intermittent therapy (2 weeks on, 1 week off). Oxaliplatin 130mg/sqm iv (2-hour infusion), first day of each 3 week cycle for >=6 weeks.
Duration of treatment:
33 weeks (Xeloda). 6 weeks (Oxaliplatin).
Reference therapy, dose and mode of administration or reference procedure:
N/A
Criteria for evaluation (efficacy, safety):
Primary efficacy parameter: objective response (investigator assessment will be reviewed by an independent review committee [IRC]).
Secondary efficacy parameters: time to disease progression, time to response, duration of response, time to treatment failure, survival, and tumor marker (CEA) levels over time.
Safety parameters: deaths, serious adverse events, premature withdrawals due to adverse events, grade 3/4 toxicities (adverse events and/or laboratory abnormalities), shifts in laboratory values, vital signs, and physical measurements.
Statistical methods:
A binomial test at the alpha level of 5% was used to test the activity of Xeloda and oxaliplatin on the overall response rate (primary variable). This analysis was based on the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, and the investigator assessment was based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria.
Summary (efficacy, safety, other results):
Efficacy – Overall tumor response rates, as assessed by the investigators, were 55.2% and 62.4% in the ITT population and in the standard population, respectively. An IRC confirmed these results. Median time to disease progression was 234 days (7.7 months; ‘general’ approach) and 239 days (7.8 months; ‘on treatment’ approach). Median duration of response was 261 days (8.6 months; WHO assessment) and 184 days (6.0 months; protocol-defined assessment). Time to treatment failure was 207.5 days (6.8 months). Median survival was 594 days (19.5 months).
Safety – The following table summarizes the main safety findings of this study:
| Safety Parameter |
Capectabine (2000 mg/sqm/day) Intermittent w/Oxaliplatin 130 mg/sqm/day n(%) |
| Overall Incidence of Pts. With AEs (All grades) |
96 |
(100) |
| No. of Pts. with Treatment-Related AEs
|
95 |
(95) |
|
Frequest (>=20%)
Treatment-Related AEs |
|
Peripheral sensory neuropathy |
82 |
(85) |
|
Diarrhea |
63 |
(66) |
|
Nausea |
63 |
(66) |
|
Vomiting |
48 |
(50) |
|
Hand-foot syndrome |
35 |
(36) |
|
Asthenia |
33 |
(34) |
|
Neuropathic pain |
30 |
(31) |
|
Anorexia |
29 |
(30) |
|
Fatique |
28 |
(29) |
|
Stomatitis all |
24 |
(25) |
|
Thrombocytopenia |
23 |
(24) |
|
|
20 |
(21) |
| Treatment-Related Grade 3/4 AEs (Severer and/or Life-threatening) |
59 |
(61) |
| Treatment-Related Grade 4 AEs (Life-threatening) |
5 |
(5) |
| Treatement-Related Grade 3 AEs (Severe) |
58 |
(60) |
| Frequent (>=10%) Treatment-Related Grade 3/4 AEs |
|
Peripheral sensory neuropathy |
16 |
(17) |
|
Diarrhea |
15 |
(16) |
|
|
11 |
(11) |
|
Related Deaths on Study |
1 |
(1) |
|
Related SAEs |
20 |
(21) |
|
Patients Withdrawn Due to AEs |
17 |
(18) |
|
Patients Withdrawn Due to Treatment-Related AEs |
14 |
(15) |
|
Patients with Cllinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities (Grade 3/4 Shift from Baseline): |
| Hyperglycemia |
|
Grade 3/4 |
3 |
(3) |
|
Grade 4 |
0 |
| Neutrophil + Gramulocyte Cell Count |
|
Grade 3/4 |
7 |
(7.3) |
|
Grade 4 |
- |
| Thrombocytopenia |
|
Grade 3/4 |
4 |
(4.2) |
|
Grade 4 |
0 |
|
Patients Withdrawn Due to Laboratory Abnormalities |
0 |
Conclusions:
The addition of Xeloda to oxaliplatin 130 mg/sqm is an effective regimen for first-line treatment of colorectal cancer with a less complicated, more convenient dosing schedule than regimens combining 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin with oxaliplatin. The efficacy achieved suggests that addition of oxaliplatin can enhance the efficacy of Xeloda in a similar fashion to that previously seen for 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin with oxaliplatin. Overall, the safety profile was predictable from the known characteristics of the 2 agents, and no unexpected adverse events were recorded.
Publications (references, if available):
Scheithauer W et al. Oral capecitabine as an alternative to iv 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for colon cancer: safety results of a randomized phase III trial. Annals of Oncology 2003; 14 (12): 1735-1743