Clinical Trial Result Information

Title of Study:
An open label, randomized, active controlled, multicentre study to assess efficacy and safety of carvedilol versus metoprolol in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris.

Fast Facts:
Protocol number:ML18030
Sponsor:Shanghai Roche Pharmaceutical Ltd
Company division:Pharmaceutical
Product name:Dilatrend
Generic name:carvedilol
Phase of development:III
Therapeutic area, approved indication:Angina Pectoris
Date of report:4/1/2006

Clinical study summary:
This trial was prematurely terminated, due to slow recruitment. Clinical trial results, other than safety statements, have not been posted, due to insufficient data.

Study center(s) :
10 centers in China.

Objectives:
1) To compare the efficacy of Dilatrend (carvedilol) twice daily and metoprolol twice daily in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris; 2) To study the safety of Dilatrend.

Methodology:
The study duration was 16 weeks (2 weeks screening, 4 weeks low dose treatment, 8 weeks final dose treatment and 2 weeks down titration). After randomization, patients were treated with low dose Dilatrend or metoprolol for 4 weeks. After 4 weeks low dose treatment, patients were titrated to the higher dose. After a further 8 weeks of active treatment study medications were tapered off over the subsequent 2 weeks.

Number of patients (planned/analyzed):
144 planned; 44 enrolled.

Diagnosis and main criteria for inclusion:
Patients ≥18 and ≤70 years of age with chronic stable angina pectoris, and with a positive treadmill exercise test.

Test product, dose and mode of administration or test procedure:
Dilatrend (carvedilol tablet) 25 mg bid for 4 weeks, a maximum of 50 mg bid for 8 weeks, 2 weeks down-titration.

Duration of treatment:
14 weeks.

Reference therapy, dose and mode of administration or reference procedure:
Metoprolol tablet 50 mg bid for 4 weeks, a maximum of 100 mg bid for 8 weeks, 2 weeks down-titration.

Criteria for evaluation (efficacy, safety):
Efficacy: Change of time to onset of 1-mm-ST-segment depression (in referred precordial leads).
Safety: Incidence of adverse events, change in vital signs, laboratory values.

Statistical methods:
Because of the premature termination of the study, there was no evaluation of the primary efficacy parameter. Safety data were evaluated descriptively.

Summary (efficacy, safety, other results):
One patient in the metoprolol group was hospitalized due to acute coronary syndrome; this SAE was not considered related to treatment. No SAE occurred in the Dilatrend group.

Conclusions:
No conclusions can be drawn from this study, due to its early termination.


Click here for the protocol registry listing of this trial.


Back


This site is run by CenterWatch, a publishing company that focuses on the clinical Trial Listings industry. The information provided in this service is designed to help patients find clinical Trial Results that may be of interest to them, and to help patients contact the centers conducting the research. CenterWatch is neither promoting this research nor involved in conducting any of these Trial Listings.

Trial Results updated: August 29, 2008 at 10:29:41 AM

Copyright © 1995 - 2008, CenterWatch
All Rights Reserved

This site was developed in association with Illumina Interactive, Boston, MA