Clinical Trials Resource Center


October 26, 2015

Neurocrine Biosciences has issued results of a phase III study of NBI-98854 for moderate to severe tardive dyskinesia patients with underlying schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar or major depressive disorder. The Kinect 3 study was a randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial and randomized 234 subjects to either placebo, once-daily 40mg of NBI-98854 or once-daily 80mg of NBI-98854 for six weeks. Subsequent to the completion of the six-week, placebo-controlled dosing, all subjects are placed on once-daily 40mg or once-daily 80mg of NBI-98854 through week 48. The pre-specified primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) at week six in the 80mg once-daily dosing group compared to placebo as assessed by central blinded video raters. The AIMS ratings at week six for the 80mg once-daily NBI-98854 intention-to-treat population was reduced 3.1 points (Least-Squares Mean) more than placebo (p<0.0001). NBI-98854 was generally well-tolerated. The frequency of adverse events was similar among all treatment groups and treatment emergent adverse effects were consistent with those of prior studies. In addition to Kinect 3, a separate one-year open-label safety study of NBI-98854, Kinect 4, also has been initiated to support the anticipated 2016 filing of a NDA in tardive dyskinesia anticipated to be filed in 2016.

March 26, 2012

Addex Therapeutics issued results from a phase IIa trial of dipraglurant for the treatment of Parkinsons disease levodopa-induced dyskinesia (PD-LID). This double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled 76 subjects with moderate or severe PD-LID. The subjects followed a dose-titration regimen, receiving 50mg doses from day 1 to day 14 and then 100mg from day 14 until day 28. Dipraglurant met the primary objective of the study by exhibiting a good safety and tolerability profile. Dipraglurant also demonstrated statistically significant reduction in LID severity with both 50mg and 100mg doses. Efficacy was measured using the modified Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (mAIMS). Peak mAIMS was significantly reduced on Day 1 (50mg; p≡0.042) and on Day 14 (100mg; p≡0.038).

December 13, 2010

Nueraltus issued positive results from a phase I/II trial of NP002 for the treatment of dyskinesias resulting from levodopa therapy for Parkinson's disease. This randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo controlled trial enrolled 65 subjects. NP002 was administered concurrently with levodopa in escalating doses from 1 mg to 6 mg, four times a day. Each dose was taken for two weeks, except the highest dose, which was taken for four weeks. Clinically relevant trends and, in two cases, statistical superiority of NP002 over placebo were observed in a variety of physician- and patient-rated efficacy outcome measures relating to dyskinesias. The combination was found to be generally safe and well-tolerated.

June 11, 2007

Faust reported positive results from a phase IIa trial of FP0011 for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. This randomized, blinded trial enrolled 8 subjects with L-dopa-induced motor complications. Subjects were administered FP0011 or placebo over 4 cross-over periods. Treatment was well tolerated. Parkinson’s symptoms, as measured by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), showed positive improvement. The effects were observed in three areas: "core" Parkinsonian motor symptoms, axial symptoms not sensitive to L-dopa or other dopaminergic drugs and dyskinesia. Based on these results, phase IIb trials are being planned for the near future.

October 3, 2005

Neurologix issued positive interim results of a phase I trial of their AAV-GAD viral-vector gene therapy, for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD), at the 19th Annual Symposia on the Etiology, Pathogenesis and Treatment of Parkinson's Disease and Other Movement Disorders in San Diego. Primary safety data yielded a positive overall tolerability profile. Preliminary efficacy data were also positive, with a statistically significant 27% improvement in symptom severity score on the side of the body corresponding to the treated part of the brain, as measured on the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, relative to baseline (p=0.04); the untreated side experienced no significant improvement. Significant decreases in the extent of abnormal metabolism associated with the disease were also noted in drug-treated portions of the brain vs. baseline; the corresponding structure in the untreated side of the brain experienced progressive increases in abnormal function. This open-label dose- escalation study enrolled 12 PD patients, who received one of 3 single doses of the gene therapy (3.5, 10 or 35 billion viral particles) via unilateral intracerebral catheter infusion into the subthalamic nucleus, followed by observational follow-up at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months.

August 11, 2003

Acadia Pharmaceuticals reported positive results from a phase I trial investigating ACP-103, a 5-HT2A inverse agonist for the treatment of various neuropsychiatric conditions. Results demonstrated that ACP-103 was safe and well tolerated with dose proportional pharmacokinetics and a long half-life. Data also demonstrated that ACP-103 was well tolerated with no changes in cardiovascular and neurological function and no serious adverse events. The randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study enrolled 49 subjects and used both single-dose and multiple-dose regimens. The single-dose study evaluated five doses ranging from 20 to 300 mg and the multiple dose-escalation study evaluated oral doses of 50, 100, and 150 mg given once-daily for 14-days.

This information does not represent a Lupus Research Institute endorsement of any listed study. It is merely a notice that the study is available. If you are presently under the care of a physician for lupus or other conditions, you should not disrupt your current program without discussing it with your doctor(s). Do not contact the Lupus Research Institute for information on these studies. Only contact the listed numbers. The Lupus Research Institute does not have any jurisdiction over or further involvement with these studies, other than to make people aware that they are being conducted.