Search Medical Condition
Please enter condition
Please choose location from dropdown
Clear Trial Filters

Greenville, Ohio Clinical Trials

A listing of Greenville, Ohio clinical trials actively recruiting patient volunteers.

RESULTS

Found (48) clinical trials

Osimertinib in Treating Patients With Stage IIIB-IV or Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the best objective response rate of AZD9291 (osimertinib) among patients with EGFR exon 20 insertions. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the safety profile of 160 mg once daily (QD) dose of AZD9291 (osimertinib) in patients with EGFR Exon 20 insertion mutations. II. To determine the ...

Phase

0.0 miles

Learn More »

Cisplatin/Carboplatin and Etoposide With or Without Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) treated with cisplatin/carboplatin and etoposide (CE) or CE with nivolumab (CEN) as front-line treatment. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To estimate overall survival of patients with ED-SCLC treated with cisplatin/carboplatin and etoposide (CE) ...

Phase

0.0 miles

Learn More »

Platinum Based Chemotherapy or Capecitabine in Treating Patients With Residual Triple-Negative Basal-Like Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients with residual basal-like disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy who are randomized to post-preoperative platinum based chemotherapy with those who are randomized to capecitabine. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate overall survival (OS) and response-free survival (RFS) ...

Phase

0.0 miles

Learn More »

Blinatumomab and Combination Chemotherapy or Dasatinib Prednisone and Blinatumomab in Treating Older Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the 3-year survival rate in elderly patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia (Ph)-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with blinatumomab followed by POMP (prednisone, vincristine sulfate, methotrexate, and mercaptopurine) maintenance. II. To evaluate in a preliminary manner (feasibility study) the safety of dasatinib-steroid based induction followed ...

Phase

0.0 miles

Learn More »

Cisplatin Carboplatin and Etoposide or Temozolomide and Capecitabine in Treating Patients With Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Gastrointestinal Tract or Pancreas That Is Metastatic or Cannot Be Removed by Surgery

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the progression free survival (PFS) of platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) and etoposide versus the PFS of temozolomide and capecitabine in patients with advanced G3 non-small cell gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the response rate (RR) of platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) and etoposide ...

Phase

0.0 miles

Learn More »

S1505: Combination Chemotherapy or Gemcitabine Hydrochloride and Paclitaxel Albumin-Stabilized Nanoparticle Formulation Before Surgery in Treating Patients With Pancreatic Cancer That Can Be Removed by Surgery

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess 2-year overall survival in each treatment arm (fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride, and oxaliplatin [modified (m)FOLFIRINOX] and gemcitabine [gemcitabine hydrochloride]/nab-paclitaxel [paclitaxel albumin-stabilized nanoparticle formulation]) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. II. If the stated threshold is met in one or both arms: to choose the better regimen ...

Phase

0.0 miles

Learn More »

Doxorubicin Hydrochloride and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Paclitaxel With or Without Carboplatin in Treating Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine whether the addition of carboplatin to an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen of doxorubicin (doxorubicin hydrochloride)/cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel will improve the invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) compared to doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel when administered to patients with operable node-positive or high-risk node-negative triple-negative breast cancer. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: ...

Phase

0.0 miles

Learn More »

Dabrafenib and Trametinib Followed by Ipilimumab and Nivolumab or Ipilimumab and Nivolumab Followed by Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Treating Patients With Stage III-IV BRAFV600 Melanoma

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine whether initial treatment with either combination ipilimumab + nivolumab (with subsequent dabrafenib in combination with trametinib) or dabrafenib in combination with trametinib (with subsequent ipilimumab + nivolumab) significantly improves 2 year overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable stage III or stage IV BRAFV600 mutant ...

Phase

0.0 miles

Learn More »

Targeted Therapy Directed by Genetic Testing in Treating Patients With Advanced Refractory Solid Tumors Lymphomas or Multiple Myeloma (The MATCH Screening Trial)

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the proportion of patients with objective response (OR) to targeted study agent(s) in patients with advanced refractory cancers/lymphomas/multiple myeloma. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the proportion of patients alive and progression free at 6 months of treatment with targeted study agent in patients with advanced ...

Phase

0.0 miles

Learn More »

Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Treating Patients With Rare Tumors

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version (v)1.1 overall response rate (ORR) in subsets of patients with advanced rare cancers treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab combination immunotherapy. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate toxicities in each cohort. II. To estimate overall survival (OS), progression-free ...

Phase

0.0 miles

Learn More »