Search Medical Condition
Please enter condition
Please choose location from dropdown
Clear Trial Filters
 

Tinley Park, Illinois Clinical Trials

A listing of Tinley Park, Illinois clinical trials actively recruiting patient volunteers.

RESULTS

Found (45) clinical trials

The purpose of this Study is to find out if the study drug ruxolitinib (“Study Drug” or ruxolitinib) is safe and effective compared to anagrelide hydrochloride (also known as Agrylin® or anagrelide), in people who have Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) and are resistant to or intolerant of Hydroxyurea. 

Phase

1.75 miles

Learn More »

Study of Niraparib Administered Alone and in Combination With PD-1 Inhibitor in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

A phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy of niraparib alone and in combination with PD-1 inhibitor in three cohorts: all histologies with high PD-L1 expression (greater than 50% TPS), all histologies low PD-L1 expression (1-49% TPS), and squamous cell lung cancer. [TPS=Tumor Proportion Score]

Phase

2.0 miles

Learn More »

Phase 2 Study of Ruxolitinib Versus Anagrelide in Subjects With Essential Thrombocythemia Who Are Resistant to or Intolerant of Hydroxyurea (RESET-272)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib versus anagrelide in subjects with essential thrombocythemia who are resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea.

Phase

2.0 miles

Learn More »

Episcleral Brachytherapy for the Treatment of Wet AMD

Subjects will receive a single brachytherapy treatment and 52-weeks of follow-up.

Phase

3.15 miles

Learn More »

Durvalumab and Tremelimumab in Treating Patients With Recurrent Stage IV Lung Cancer

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the objective response rate (confirmed and unconfirmed, complete and partial) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 among patients treated with durvalumab (MEDI4736) plus tremelimumab. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To estimate the duration of response (DoR) among patients who achieve a complete response (CR) ...

Phase

3.2 miles

Learn More »

Cabozantinib and Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Advanced Recurrent or Metastatic Endometrial Cancer

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the clinical anti-tumor activity of XL184 (cabozantinib) and nivolumab based on progression free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced, recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer previously treated with at least one line of platinum-based chemotherapy compared to patients receiving nivolumab alone. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate ...

Phase

3.2 miles

Learn More »

Cisplatin/Carboplatin and Etoposide With or Without Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) treated with cisplatin/carboplatin and etoposide (CE) or CE with nivolumab (CEN) as front-line treatment. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To estimate overall survival of patients with ED-SCLC treated with cisplatin/carboplatin and etoposide (CE) ...

Phase

3.2 miles

Learn More »

Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Treating Patients With Rare Tumors

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version (v)1.1 overall response rate (ORR) in subsets of patients with advanced rare cancers treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab combination immunotherapy. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate toxicities in each cohort. II. To estimate overall survival (OS), progression-free ...

Phase

3.2 miles

Learn More »

Cisplatin Carboplatin and Etoposide or Temozolomide and Capecitabine in Treating Patients With Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Gastrointestinal Tract or Pancreas That Is Metastatic or Cannot Be Removed by Surgery

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the progression free survival (PFS) of platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) and etoposide versus the PFS of temozolomide and capecitabine in patients with advanced G3 non-small cell gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the response rate (RR) of platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) and etoposide ...

Phase

3.2 miles

Learn More »

S1505: Combination Chemotherapy or Gemcitabine Hydrochloride and Paclitaxel Albumin-Stabilized Nanoparticle Formulation Before Surgery in Treating Patients With Pancreatic Cancer That Can Be Removed by Surgery

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess 2-year overall survival in each treatment arm (fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride, and oxaliplatin [modified (m)FOLFIRINOX] and gemcitabine [gemcitabine hydrochloride]/nab-paclitaxel [paclitaxel albumin-stabilized nanoparticle formulation]) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. II. If the stated threshold is met in one or both arms: to choose the better regimen ...

Phase

3.2 miles

Learn More »